Resumen ejecutivo del documento de consenso sobre el manejo de la anemia perioperatoria en España / Executive summary of the consensus document on the management of perioperative anemia in Spain

La anemia perioperatoria constituye un factor independiente de riesgo de morbimortalidad posoperatoria. Sin embargo, persisten barreras conceptuales, logísticas y administrativas que dificultan la implementación generalizada de protocolos para su manejo. El coordinador del proyecto convocó a un grupo multidisciplinar de ocho profesionales para elaborar un documento de consenso sobre el manejo de la anemia perioperatoria, con base a en serie puntos claves (PCs) relativos a su prevalencia, consecuencias, diagnóstico y tratamiento. Estos PCs fueron evaluados utilizando una escala Likert de 5 puntos, desde «totalmente en desacuerdo [1]» a «totalmente de acuerdo [5]». Cada PC se consideró consensuado si recibía una puntuación de 4 o 5 por al menos siete participantes (> 75%). A partir de los 36 PCs consensuados, se construyeron algoritmos diagnóstico-terapéuticos que pueden facilitar la implementación de programas de identificación precoz y manejo adecuado de la anemia perioperatoria, adaptados a las características de las instituciones hospitalarias de nuestro país.(AU)

Perioperative anemia is an independent risk factor for postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, conceptual, logistical and administrative barriers persist that hinder the widespread implementation of protocols for their management. The project coordinator convened a multidisciplinary group of 9 experienced professionals to develop perioperative anemia management algorithms, based on a series of key points (KPs) related to its prevalence, consequences, diagnosis and treatment. These KPs were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, from “strongly disagree [1]” to “strongly agree [5]”. For each KP, consensus was reached when receiving a score of 4 or 5 from at least 7 participants (>75%). Based on the 36 KPs agreed upon, diagnostic-therapeutic algorithms were developed that we believe can facilitate the implementation of programs for early identification and adequate management of perioperative anemia, adapted to the characteristics of the different institutions in our country.(AU)

Management of peri-surgical anemia in elective surgery. Conclusions and recommendations according to Delphi-UCLA methodology.

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative anemia affects approximately one third of surgical patients. It increases the risk of blood transfusion and influences short- and medium-term functional outcomes, increases comorbidities, complications and costs. The "Patient Blood Management" (PBM) programs, for integrated and multidisciplinary management of patients, are considered as paradigms of quality care and have as one of the fundamental objectives to correct perioperative anemia. PBM has been incorporated into the schemes for intensified recovery of surgical patients: the recent Enhanced Recovery After Surgery 2021 pathway (in Spanish RICA 2021) includes almost 30 indirect recommendations for PBM. OBJECTIVE: To make a consensus document with RAND/UCLA Delphi methodology to increase the penetration and priority of the RICA 2021 recommendations on PBM in daily clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A coordinating group composed of 6 specialists from Hematology-Hemotherapy, Anesthesiology and Internal Medicine with expertise in anemia and PBM was formed. A survey was elaborated using Delphi RAND/UCLA methodology to reach a consensus on the key areas and priority professional actions to be developed at the present time to improve the management of perioperative anemia. The survey questions were extracted from the PBM recommendations contained in the RICA 2021 pathway. The development of the electronic survey (Google Platform) and the management of the responses was the responsibility of an expert in quality of care and clinical safety. Participants were selected by invitation from speakers at AWGE-GIEMSA scientific meetings and national representatives of PBM-related working groups (Seville Document, SEDAR HTF section and RICA 2021 pathway participants). In the first round of the survey, the anonymized online questionnaire had 28 questions: 20 of them were about PBM concepts included in ERAS guidelines (2 about general PBM organization, 10 on diagnosis and treatment of preoperative anemia, 3 on management of postoperative anemia, 5 on transfusion criteria) and 8 on pending aspects of research. Responses were organized according to a 10-point Likter scale (0: strongly disagree to 10: strongly agree). Any additional contributions that the participants considered appropriate were allowed. They were considered consensual because all the questions obtained an average score of more than 9 points, except one (question 14). The second round of the survey consisted of 37 questions, resulting from the reformulation of the questions of the first round and the incorporation of the participants' comments. It consisted of 2 questions about general organization of PBM programme, 15 questions on the diagnosis and treatment of preoperative anemia; 3 on the management of postoperative anemia, 6 on transfusional criteria and finally 11 questions on aspects pending od future investigations. Statistical treatment: tabulation of mean, median and interquartiles 25-75 of the value of each survey question (Tables 1, 2 and 3). RESULTS: Except for one, all the recommendations were accepted. Except for three, all above 8, and most with an average score of 9 or higher. They are grouped into: 1.- "It is important and necessary to detect and etiologically diagnose any preoperative anemia state in ALL patients who are candidates for surgical procedures with potential bleeding risk, including pregnant patients". 2.- "The preoperative treatment of anemia should be initiated sufficiently in advance and with all the necessary hematinic contributions to correct this condition". 3.- "There is NO justification for transfusing any unit of packed red blood cells preoperatively in stable patients with moderate anemia Hb 8-10g/dL who are candidates for potentially bleeding surgery that cannot be delayed." 4.- "It is recommended to universalize restrictive criteria for red blood cell transfusion in surgical and obstetric patients." 5.- "Postoperative anemia should be treated to improve postoperative results and accelerate postoperative recovery in the short and medium term". CONCLUSIONS: There was a large consensus, with maximum acceptance,strong level of evidence and high recommendation in most of the questions asked. Our work helps to identify initiatives and performances who can be suitables for the implementation of PBM programs at each hospital and for all patients.

Executive summary of the consensus document on the management of perioperative anemia in Spain.

Perioperative anemia is an independent risk factor for postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, conceptual, logistical and administrative barriers persist that hinder the widespread implementation of protocols for their management. The project coordinator convened a multidisciplinary group of 8 experienced professionals to develop perioperative anemia management algorithms, based on a series of key points (KPs) related to its prevalence, consequences, diagnosis and treatment. These KPs were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, from "strongly disagree [1]" to "strongly agree [5]". For each KP, consensus was reached when receiving a score of 4 or 5 from at least 7 participants (>75%). Based on the 36 KPs agreed upon, diagnostic-therapeutic algorithms were developed that we believe can facilitate the implementation of programs for early identification and adequate management of perioperative anemia, adapted to the characteristics of the different institutions in our country.

SEA 2022 Standards for Global Control of Cardiovascular Risk. / Estándares SEA 2022 para el control global del riesgo cardiovascular.

One of the objectives of the Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis is to contribute to better knowledge of vascular disease, its prevention and treatment. It is well known that cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in our country and entail a high degree of disability and health care costs. Arteriosclerosis is a multifactorial disease and therefore its prevention requires a global approach that takes into account the different risk factors with which it is associated. Therefore, this document summarizes the current level of knowledge and includes recommendations and procedures to be followed in patients with established cardiovascular disease or at high vascular risk. Specifically, this document reviews the main symptoms and signs to be evaluated during the clinical visit, the laboratory and imaging procedures to be routinely requested or requested for those in special situations. It also includes vascular risk estimation, the diagnostic criteria of the different entities that are cardiovascular risk factors, and makes general and specific recommendations for the treatment of the different cardiovascular risk factors and their final objectives. Finally, the document includes aspects that are not usually referenced in the literature, such as the organization of a vascular risk consultation.

Patient Blood Management en artroplastia primaria de cadera y rodilla. Encuesta entre los investigadores del estudio POWER.2 / Patient Blood Management for primary hip and knee replacement. A survey among POWER.2 study researchers

ANTECEDENTES: La implementación de los programas Patient Blood Management (PBM) es variable en Europa, incluso en centros en los que estos programas están bien establecidos, donde existe variabilidad en cuanto a prácticas transfusionales. OBJETIVOS Y MÉTODOS: Realizamos una encuesta para valorar la práctica actual sobre PBM perioperatoria en pacientes programados para artroplastia total de cadera y rodilla, entre los investigadores involucrados en el Estudio POWER.2 en España (estudio observacional prospectivo que evaluaba las vías de recuperación intensificada en cirugía ortopédica). RESULTADOS: Se obtuvo un total de 322 respuestas (37,8%). El 50% de los respondedores revisaban los niveles de hemoglobina, al menos 4 semanas antes de la cirugía; el 35% trataba a todos los pacientes anémicos, aunque el 99,7% consideraba que la detección y tratamiento de la anemia preoperatoria podrían influir en los resultados postoperatorios. La falta de infraestructuras (76%) y la falta de tiempo (51%) fueron los principales motivos para no tratar a los pacientes anémicos. El estatus del hierro es revisado antes de la cirugía por el 19% de manera rutinaria, y el 36% lo evalúa únicamente en pacientes anémicos. Hb<9,9g/dl es el valor umbral para demorar la cirugía para el 61% de los clínicos, y el 22% consideraría transfundir preoperatoriamente a los pacientes clínicamente estables sin sangrado activo. El valor umbral para transfundir a los pacientes sin enfermedad cardiovascular es 8g/dl para el 43% y 7g/dl para el 34% de los respondedores; el 75% de los facultativos considera que utiliza «umbrales restrictivos», y el 90% sigue la política transfusional uno a uno (single unit). CONCLUSIONES: Los resultados de nuestra encuesta muestran la variabilidad en la práctica clínica en PBM en cirugía ortopédica mayor, a pesar de ser el tipo de cirugía con más tradición en estos programas

BACKGROUND: Implementation of Patient Blood Management programs remain variable in Europe, and even in centres with well-established PBM programs variability exists in transfusion practices. OBJECTIBES AND METHODS: We conducted a survey in order to assess current practice in perioperative Patient Blood Management in patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement among researchers involved in POWER.2 Study in Spain (an observational prospective study evaluating enhanced recovery pathways in orthopaedic surgery). RESULTS: A total of 322 responses were obtained (37.8%). Half of responders check Haemoglobin levels in patients at least 4 weeks before surgery; 35% treat all anaemic patients, although 99.7% consider detection and treatment of preoperative anaemia could influence the postoperative outcomes. Lack of infrastructure (76%) and lack of time (51%) are the main stated reasons not to treat anaemic patients. Iron status is routinely checked by 19% before surgery, and 36% evaluate it solely in the anaemic patient. Hb<9.9 g/dl is the threshold to delay surgery for 61% of clinicians, and 22% would consider transfusing preoperatively clinically stable patients without active bleeding. The threshold to transfuse patients without cardiovascular disease is 8 g/dl for 43%, and 7 g/dl for 34% of the responders; 75% of clinicians consider they use "restrictive thresholds", and 90% follow the single unit transfusion policy. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our survey show variability in clinical practice in Patient Blood Management in major orthopaedic surgery, despite being the surgery with the greatest tradition in these programs

Patient Blood Management for primary hip and knee replacement. A survey among POWER.2 study researchers. / Patient Blood Management en artroplastia primaria de cadera y rodilla. Encuesta entre los investigadores del estudio POWER.2.

BACKGROUND: Implementation of Patient Blood Management programs remain variable in Europe, and even in centres with well-established PBM programs variability exists in transfusion practices. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: We conducted a survey in order to assess current practice in perioperative Patient Blood Management in patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement among researchers involved in POWER.2 Study in Spain (an observational prospective study evaluating enhanced recovery pathways in orthopaedic surgery). RESULTS: A total of 322 responses were obtained (37.8%). Half of responders check Haemoglobin levels in patients at least 4 weeks before surgery; 35% treat all anaemic patients, although 99.7% consider detection and treatment of preoperative anaemia could influence the postoperative outcomes. Lack of infrastructure (76%) and lack of time (51%) are the main stated reasons not to treat anaemic patients. Iron status is routinely checked by 19% before surgery, and 36% evaluate it solely in the anaemic patient. Hb<9.9 g/dl is the threshold to delay surgery for 61% of clinicians, and 22% would consider transfusing preoperatively clinically stable patients without active bleeding. The threshold to transfuse patients without cardiovascular disease is 8 g/dl for 43%, and 7 g/dl for 34% of the responders; 75% of clinicians consider they use "restrictive thresholds", and 90% follow the single unit transfusion policy. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our survey show variability in clinical practice in Patient Blood Management in major orthopaedic surgery, despite being the surgery with the greatest tradition in these programs.

Auditoría nacional de complicaciones después de la cirugía gástrica por cáncer dentro o no de un protocolo de recuperación intensificada (POWER.4): Protocolo de un estudio prospectivo, multicéntrico, observacional de cohortes / Postoperative Outcomes Within an Enhanced Recovery after surgery protocol in gastric surgery for cancer (POWER.4): Study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study

ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVO: Los protocolos de recuperación intensificada o ERAS se han aplicado en cirugía de cáncer gástrico extrapolados desde la cirugía colorrectal. El objetivo del estudio es evaluar la incidencia de complicaciones postoperatorias a los 30 días de la cirugía de resección gástrica por cáncer, con cualquier nivel de cumplimiento del protocolo ERAS. Los objetivos secundarios son evaluar la mortalidad a 30 días, la relación entre la adherencia al protocolo ERAS y las complicaciones, el impacto de cada uno de los ítems del protocolo en las complicaciones postoperatorias y en la estancia hospitalaria, y describir el efecto de las complicaciones postoperatorias en la duración de la estancia hospitalaria. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio multicéntrico, observacional, prospectivo que incluirá todos los pacientes consecutivos que vayan a ser tratados mediante cirugía de cáncer gástrico programada, durante un periodo de 3 meses, con un seguimiento de 30 días en los centros participantes, con cualquier nivel de cumplimiento del protocolo. RESULTADOS: Se ha obtenido la aprobación del Comité Autonómico de Ética de la Investigación de Aragón (C.P.-C.I. PI19/106, del 27 de marzo del 2019). POWER.4 fue registrado en www.clinicaltrials.gov el 7 de marzo del 2019 (NCT03865810). CONCLUSIONES: Los datos en conjunto serán publicados en revistas con revisión por pares. No se harán públicos los datos identificando cada centro participante. Se espera que los resultados de este estudio permitirán identificar áreas potenciales de mejora en las que se necesite realizar una investigación más dirigida

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Enhanced recovery pathways or ERAS have been applied in gastric cancer surgery extrapolated from colorectal surgery. The objective of the study is to assess postoperative complications 30 days after gastric surgery for cancer, with any level of compliance with the ERAS protocol. The secondary objectives are to assess 30-day mortality, the relationship between adherence to the ERAS protocol and complications, the impact of each of the items of the protocol on postoperative complications and hospital stay, and to describe the impact of complications on length of hospital stay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multicenter, observational, prospective study including all consecutive patients undergoing scheduled gastric cancer surgery, over a period of 3 months, with a 30-day follow-up at participating centers, with any level of compliance with the protocol. RESULTS: The approval of the Comité Autonómico de Ética de la Investigación de Aragón has been obtained (C.P. - C.I. PI19 / 106, 27 th March 2019). POWER.4 was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov on March 7, 2019 (NCT03865810). CONCLUSIONS: The data as a whole will be published in peer-reviewed journals. The data will not be made public by identifying each participating center. It is expected that the results of this study will identify potential areas for improvement in which more targeted research is needed

Impact on clinical practice of the preoperative screening of Covid-19 infection in surgical oncological patients. Prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In the oncological patient, an COVID-19-Infection, whether symptomatic or asymptomatic, a surgical procedure may carry a higher postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to describe the impact on clinical practice of sequential preoperative screening for COVID-19-infection in deciding whether to proceed or postpone surgery. METHODS: Prospective, cohort study, based on consecutive patients' candidates for an oncological surgical intervention. Sequential preoperative screening for COVID-19-infection: two-time medical history (telematic and face-to-face), PCR and chest CT, 48 h before of surgical intervention. COVID-19-infection was considered positive if the patient had a suggestive medical history and/or PCR-positive and/or CT of pneumonia. RESULTS: Between April 15th and May 4th, 2020, 179 patients were studied, 97 were male (54%), mean (sd) age 66.7 (13,6). Sequential preoperative screening was performed within 48 h before to surgical intervention. The prevalence of preoperative COVID-19-infection was 4.5%, 95%CI:2.3-8.6% (8 patients). Of the operated patients (171), all had a negative medical history, PCR and chest CT. The complications was 14.8% (I-II) and 2.5% (III-IV). There was no mortality. The hospital stay was 3.1 (sd 2.7) days.In the 8 patients with COVID-19-infection, the medical history was suggestive in all of them, 7 presented PCR-positive and 5 had a chest CT suggestive of pneumonia. The surgical intervention was postponed between 15 and 21 days. CONCLUSION: Preoperative screening for COVID-19-infection using medical history and PCR helped the surgeon to decide whether to go ahead or postpone surgery in oncological patients. The chest CT may be useful in unclear cases.

Postoperative Outcomes Within an Enhanced Recovery after surgery protocol in gastric surgery for cancer (POWER.4): Study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study. / Auditoría nacional de complicaciones después de la cirugía gástrica por cáncer dentro o no de un protocolo de recuperación intensificada (POWER.4): Protocolo de un estudio prospectivo, multicéntrico, observacional de cohortes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Enhanced recovery pathways or ERAS have been applied in gastric cancer surgery extrapolated from colorectal surgery. The objective of the study is to assess postoperative complications 30 days after gastric surgery for cancer, with any level of compliance with the ERAS protocol. The secondary objectives are to assess 30-day mortality, the relationship between adherence to the ERAS protocol and complications, the impact of each of the items of the protocol on postoperative complications and hospital stay, and to describe the impact of complications on length of hospital stay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multicenter, observational, prospective study including all consecutive patients undergoing scheduled gastric cancer surgery, over a period of 3 months, with a 30-day follow-up at participating centers, with any level of compliance with the protocol. RESULTS: The approval of the Comité Autonómico de Ética de la Investigación de Aragón has been obtained (C.P. - C.I. PI19 / 106, 27 th March 2019). POWER.4 was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov on March 7, 2019 (NCT03865810). CONCLUSIONS: The data as a whole will be published in peer-reviewed journals. The data will not be made public by identifying each participating center. It is expected that the results of this study will identify potential areas for improvement in which more targeted research is needed.

Área de Atención Integrada de Riesgo Vascular: un nuevo modelo organizativo para el control global de los factores de riesgo / Integrated Management Area of Vascular Risk: A new organisational model for global control of risk factors

La enfermedad cardiovascular (ECV) es una causa importante de morbimortalidad que incrementa el coste asistencial. Actualmente existe un bajo grado de control de los principales factores de riesgo cardiovascular, a pesar de que disponemos de un buen arsenal terapéutico. Para lograr la mejora de esta realidad es fundamental la coordinación y participación multiprofesional. El desarrollo de nuevos modelos organizativos, como el Área de Atención Integrada de Riesgo Vascular, puede facilitar la armonización terapéutica y la unificación de los mensajes sanitarios ofrecidos por los distintos niveles asistenciales, basados en las guías de práctica clínica, con el fin de ofrecer una atención integrada y centrada en el paciente

Cardiovascular disease (CVD), is a major cause of morbidity and mortality that increases the cost of care. Currently there is a low degree of control of the main cardiovascular risk factors, although we have a good therapeutic arsenal. To achieve the improvement of this reality, a good coordination and multidisciplinary participation are essential. The development of new organizational models such as the Integrated Management Area of Vascular Risk can facilitate the therapeutic harmonization and unification of the health messages offered by different levels of care, based on clinical practice guidelines, in order to provide patient-centred integrated care

[Integrated Management Area of Vascular Risk: A new organisational model for global control of risk factors]. / Área de Atención Integrada de Riesgo Vascular: un nuevo modelo organizativo para el control global de los factores de riesgo.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD), is a major cause of morbidity and mortality that increases the cost of care. Currently there is a low degree of control of the main cardiovascular risk factors, although we have a good therapeutic arsenal. To achieve the improvement of this reality, a good coordination and multidisciplinary participation are essential. The development of new organizational models such as the Integrated Management Area of Vascular Risk can facilitate the therapeutic harmonization and unification of the health messages offered by different levels of care, based on clinical practice guidelines, in order to provide patient-centred integrated care.

[Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in HIV-infected patients]. / Prevalencia de factores de riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes con infección por el VIH.

INTRODUCTION: To determine the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A cross-sectional study was performed with HIV-infected patients aged 20 or over managed at the outpatient Infectious Disease Unit during 2003. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of HIV infection and cardiovascular risk factors were evaluated. RESULTS: The final 760 patients included in the study had a mean of 1.5 cardiovascular risk factors, with smoking being the most prevalent (66.8%; CI 95%: 63.4-70.2). The cardiovascular risk factor of age and gender was present in 26.4% (CI 95%: 23.3-29.7) of patients and family history of premature coronary heart disease in 14.3% (CI 95%: 11.8-16.9). The prevalence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus was 13.2% (CI 95%: 10.8-15.8) and 4.3% (CI 95%: 3.0-6.0), respectively. High density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentration under 40 mg/dl was found in 29.3% (CI 95%: 26.1-32.7) and above 60 mg/dl in 16.3% (CI 95%: 13.8-19.1). Twenty-five patients (3.3%; CI 95%: 2.1-4.8) had suffered overt cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSION: Smoking and HDL cholesterol were the main cardiovascular risk factors in this HIV-infected cohort.

Prevalencia de factores de riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes con infección por el VIH / Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in HIV-infected patients

Introducción. Determinar la prevalencia de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH). Pacientes y método. Estudio transversal en pacientes de 20 años o mayores con infección por el VIH durante el año 2003 en la consulta externa del Servicio de Medicina Interna y Enfermedades Infecciosas del Hospital del Mar de Barcelona. Se evaluaron las características clínico-epidemiológicas de la infección por el VIH y los factores de riesgo cardiovascular. Resultados. Los 760 pacientes incluidos en el estudio presentaban una media de 1,5 factores de riesgo cardiovascular, siendo el consumo de cigarrillos el más prevalente (66,8%; intervalo de confianza [IC] 95%: 63,4-70,2). La edad y el sexo como factor de riesgo cardiovascular estuvo presente en el 26,4% (IC 95%: 23,3-29,7) de los pacientes y los antecedentes familiares de cardiopatía isquémica precoz en el 14,3% (IC 95%: 11,8-16,9). La prevalencia de hipertensión y de diabetes mellitus fue del 13,2% (IC 95%: 10,8-15,8) y 4,3% (IC 95%: 3,0-6,0), respectivamente. En el 29,3% (IC 95%: 26,1-32,7) se detectó una concentración de colesterol de las lipoproteínas de alta densidad (c-HDL) inferior a 40 mg/dl y superior a 60 mg/dl en el 16,3% (IC 95%:13,8-19,1). Veinticinco pacientes (3,3%; IC 95%: 2,1-4,8) habían presentado enfermedad cardiovascular sintomática. Conclusión. El tabaquismo y el c-HDL destacan como los principales factores de riesgo cardiovascular en esta cohorte de pacientes con infección por el VIH

Introduction. To determine the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. Patients and method. A cross-sectional study was performed with HIV-infected patients aged 20 or over managed at the outpatient Infectious Disease Unit during 2003. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of HIV infection and cardiovascular risk factors were evaluated. Results. The final 760 patients included in the study had a mean of 1.5 cardiovascular risk factors, with smoking being the most prevalent (66.8%; CI 95%: 63.4-70.2). The cardiovascular risk factor of age and gender was present in 26.4% (CI 95%: 23.3-29.7) of patients and family history of premature coronary heart disease in 14.3% (CI 95%: 11.8-16.9). The prevalence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus was 13.2% (CI 95%: 10.8-15.8) and 4.3% (CI 95%: 3.0-6.0), respectively. High density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentration under 40 mg/dl was found in 29.3% (CI 95%: 26.1-32.7) and above 60 mg/dl in 16.3% (CI 95%: 13.8-19.1). Twenty-five patients (3.3%; CI 95%: 2.1-4.8) had suffered overt cardiovascular disease. Conclusion. Smoking and HDL cholesterol were the main cardiovascular risk factors in this HIV-infected cohort

Síndrome metabólico en pacientes con lipodistrofia infectados por el VIH / Metabolic syndrome among HIV-infected patients with lipodystrophy

Introducción. La lipodistrofia en los pacientes con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) puede contemplarse como un factor predisponente al desarrollo del síndrome metabólico. Por dicho motivo en el presente estudio se ha evaluado la prevalencia de síndrome metabólico en estos pacientes según el tipo de lipodistrofia y los posibles factores relacionados. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio transversal que incluyó a los pacientes mayores de 20 años, con infección por el VIH y anomalías en la distribución de la grasa corporal atendidos en la consulta externa del Servicio de Medicina Interna y Enfermedades Infecciosas del Hospital del Mar de Barcelona, durante el año 2003. La identificación del síndrome metabólico se estableció según los criterios del Panel III del National Cholesterol Education Program. La lipodistrofía se evaluó por exploración física y se clasificó en lipoatrofia, lipohipertrofia y formas mixtas. Resultados. El 99% de los 260 pacientes incluidos recibía tratamiento antirretroviral. La prevalencia de síndrome metabólico fue del 23,5%. Según el patrón de lipodistrofia, la prevalencia fue del 15,1% en los pacientes con lipoatrofia aislada y del 35,2% en los que presentaban lipoacúmulo. El índice de masa corporal (odds ratio [OR]: 1,22; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%, 1,1-1,36) fue el único factor que se asoció de forma independiente y significativa con la presencia de síndrome metabólico en los pacientes con lipodistrofia. Conclusiones. La presencia de lipoacúmulo duplica la prevalencia de síndrome metabólico en los pacientes infectados por el VIH con lipodistrofia. Dado que el índice de masa corporal es el principal predictor del riesgo de aparición de síndrome metabólico en estos pacientes, deben enfatizarse las medidas dirigidas a cambiar los estilos de vida (AU)

Introduction. Lipodystrophy in HIV-infected patients may be a predisposing factor for metabolic syndrome. The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among HIV-infected patients with lipodystrophy and to analyze the possible associated factors. Patients and methods. A cross-sectional study was performed in HIV-infected patients aged 20 years old and older with lipodystrophy managed at the Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases Outpatient Unit of Hospital del Mar in Barcelona (Spain), in 2003. The National Cholesterol Education Program-APT III criteria for the identification of metabolic syndrome were used. Lipodystrophy was evaluated by clinical examination and classified as lipoatrophy, lipohypertrophy and mixed forms. Results. Ninety-nine percent of the 260 patients included were on antiretroviral therapy. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 23.5%. Based on the lipodystrophy pattern, the prevalence ranged from 15.1% in patients with isolated lipoatrophy to 35.2% in those with lipoaccumulation pattern. The only independent factor associated with the presence of metabolic syndrome among patients with lipodystrophy was body mass index (OR: 1.22; 95% CI, 1.1-1.36). Conclusions. The presence of lipoaccumulation doubles the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in HIV-infected patients with lipodystrophy. Since body mass index was the main independent predictor of metabolic syndrome in the present study, interventions aimed at lifestyle changes should be prioritized in these patients (AU)

Otitis media serosa bilateral como primera manifestación de una poliangeítis microscópica / Bilateral otitis media as presentation form of microscopic polyangiitis

No disponible