Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 16(1): 10-3, 2004 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14699215

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Percutaneous stenting has become the procedure of choice for treatment of obstructive atherosclerotic renal artery (RA) disease. Restenosis, however, continues to be in the range of 15-25% of treated vessels. In this study, clinical and angiographic predictors of restenosis were assessed. Of 132 vessels included, fifty-eight were followed for restenosis using duplex Doppler (n=15), conventional angiogram (n=33) or multislice computed tomography (CT) angiogram (n=10). Fifteen vessels (26%) met the criteria for restenosis (lesion > or =50% by conventional or CT angiography or >60% by Doppler) at a follow-up range of 2-20 months (5% <2 months; 68% 3-12 months; 27% 13-20 months). Cox Regression analyses were performed for selected variables. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. History of smoking [odds ratio (OR), 6.6:1; p=0.005] and time to evaluate for restenosis were independent predictors of the occurrence of restenosis. Also, a high restenosis rate (40%) was seen in vessels < or =4 mm in diameter (n=20) in contrast to larger vessels (n=38) >4 mm (18.4%). Although statistical significance was not reached (possibly because of the small sample size), clinically this is a significant finding. A significant drop in systolic (-15.6 mmHg) and diastolic (-6.2 mmHg) blood pressures was seen following RA stenting with no significant change in the total number of antihypertensives used (2.4 versus 2.5 for pre- and post-renal stenting, respectively). CONCLUSION: Restenosis occurred in 26% of successfully stented RAs. History of smoking, time to evaluate for restenosis and small vessels (< or =4 mm) were predictors of its occurrence. Clinically, a significant drop in blood pressure was seen with RA stenting without a change in the total number of antihypertensives on follow-up.


Subject(s)
Angiography/methods , Angioplasty, Balloon/instrumentation , Renal Artery Obstruction/diagnostic imaging , Renal Artery Obstruction/therapy , Stents , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angioplasty, Balloon/adverse effects , Angioplasty, Balloon/methods , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Probability , Proportional Hazards Models , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, Doppler
2.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 55(4): 421-5, 2002 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11948884

ABSTRACT

AngioSeal (AS) and VasoSeal (VS) are collagen-based arterial closure devices utilized to achieve earlier hemostasis and ambulation in diagnostic and interventional percutaneous procedures. To our knowledge, there has been no randomized studies comparing these two devices as approved for use in the United States. One hundred fifty-seven patients were randomized to receive either the 8 Fr AS (n = 79) or VS (n = 78) closure device. Data on 95 patients who had coronary angiography (49 AS, 46 VS) and 55 patients who underwent angioplasty (28 AS, 27 VS) were completed. Heparin was not administered during the coronary angiogram procedure. The activated clotting time was kept at approximately 300 sec during angioplasty. Patients on coumadin or GP IIb/IIIa platelet inhibitors were not included in this study. The time unit interval to achieve hemostasis in this study was based on the time the AS tension spring was left over the common femoral artery following collagen deployment as per the manufacturer's instructions (20 min). Time to hemostasis, time to ambulation, and major and minor complications were prospectively recorded. Two-tailed t-test and chi-square analysis were performed on continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. For the angiogram-only subgroup, time (min) to hemostasis (20.51 +/- 4.36 vs. 18.59 +/- 11.77; P = 0.30) and ambulation (145.71 +/- 124 vs. 109.89 +/- 60.37; P = 0.075) were not statistically different for the AS and VS, respectively. Similarly, for the angioplasty subgroup, time (min) to hemostasis (24.23 +/- 12.70 vs. 19.57 +/- 2.27; P = 0.077) and ambulation (607.32 +/- 344.22 vs. 486.48 +/- 200.37; P = 0.12) were not statistically different for both AS and VS, respectively. Furthermore, there were no statistical differences in deployment failure, major, minor, or total complication rates between the two devices. In the absence of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, VS and the 8 Fr AS devices have statistically similar time to hemostasis and ambulation as well as device failures and complication rates following coronary angiography and angioplasty.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/adverse effects , Collagen/adverse effects , Collagen/therapeutic use , Coronary Angiography/adverse effects , Coronary Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Disease/therapy , Hemostasis, Surgical/adverse effects , Sutures/adverse effects , Aged , Early Ambulation , Equipment Failure , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...