ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of depowered frontal airbags on the incidence of severe upper extremity injuries. METHODS: The National Automotive Sampling System database files from 1993 to 2000 were examined in a study that included 2,413,347 occupants who were exposed to an airbag deployment in the United States. RESULTS: Occupants exposed to a depowered airbag deployment were significantly more likely to sustain a severe upper extremity injury (3.9%) than those occupants exposed to a full-powered airbag deployment (2.5%) (P=.01). Full-powered systems resulted in an injury distribution of 89.2% fractures and 7.9% dislocations compared with depowered systems with 55.3% fractures and 44.3% dislocations. CONCLUSIONS: Although depowered airbags were designed to reduce the risk of injuries, they appear to have increased the overall incidence of severe upper extremity injuries through a shift from long bone fractures to joint dislocations.
Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Air Bags/adverse effects , Air Bags/statistics & numerical data , Arm Injuries/epidemiology , Abbreviated Injury Scale , Adult , Arm Injuries/classification , Arm Injuries/etiology , Causality , Female , Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Fractures, Bone/etiology , Humans , Incidence , Joint Dislocations/epidemiology , Joint Dislocations/etiology , Male , Risk Factors , Seat Belts/statistics & numerical data , Sex Distribution , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of depowered frontal airbags on the incidence of skin injuries. The National Automotive Sampling System database files from 1993 to 2000 were examined in a study including 2,246,524 occupants exposed to airbag deployment in the United States. There was no significant difference between full-powered and depowered airbags, with 60.2 percent of those exposed to a full-powered deployment sustaining a skin injury versus 59.5 percent of occupants exposed to a depowered airbag (p = 0.19). Whether occupants were exposed to a full-powered airbag (1,936,485 occupants) or a depowered airbay (310,039 occupants), the majority of skin injuries were to the upper extremity and the face. Regardless of airbag power, the overwhelming majority of the skin injuries were minor (99.8 percent). There was not a significantly greater risk of injury from any source for occupants exposed to a depowered airbag or a full-powered airbag (p = 0.87). The data suggest that the implementation of depowered airbags did not affect the number, seriousness, location, or source of skin injuries.
Subject(s)
Air Bags/classification , Facial Injuries/epidemiology , Skin/injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/epidemiology , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Air Bags/statistics & numerical data , Arm , Contusions/epidemiology , Equipment Failure , Facial Injuries/classification , Humans , Incidence , Lacerations/epidemiology , Trauma Severity Indices , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/classificationABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to investigate burn injuries resulting from frontal automobile crashes and to determine the effects of frontal airbags on the incidence of burn injuries. The study included 25,464 individual cases from the National Automotive Sampling System database files for the years 1993 to 2000. Occupants were at a significantly higher risk to sustain a burn injury when exposed to an airbag deployment (1.54%) compared with those who received a burn injury when not exposed to an airbag deployment (0.02%; P = 0.02). In contrast to previous publications, this study found that 1.53% of front seat occupants exposed to an airbag deployment sustained an airbag-induced burn injury. The vast majority of airbag-induced burn injuries were minor (98.7%); however, in cases with no airbag deployment, the burns were often much more serious, including fatal burns (29.6%). Occupant weight, height, sex, seatbelt use, and seat position were all found not to be significant in predicting the risk of airbag induced burn injury, whereas age and crash velocity were found to be significant.
Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/classification , Air Bags/adverse effects , Automobiles , Burns/epidemiology , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Burns/classification , Burns/etiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to investigate severe upper extremity injuries resulting from frontal automobile crashes and to determine the effects of frontal airbags. The National Automotive Sampling System database files from 1993 to 2000 were examined in a study that included 25,464 individual cases that occurred in the United States. An analysis of the cases indicated that occupants exposed to an airbag deployment were statistically more likely to sustain a severe upper extremity injury (2.7%) than those occupants not exposed to an airbag deployment (1.6%) (P =.01). In particular, 0.7% of occupants exposed to an airbag deployment sustained a severe upper extremity injury specifically from the airbag. In addition, when in crashes with an airbag deployment, older occupants were at a higher risk for severe upper extremity injury, as well as occupants in crashes with higher changes in velocity.
Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Air Bags/adverse effects , Upper Extremity/injuries , Air Bags/statistics & numerical data , Arm Injuries/classification , Arm Injuries/epidemiology , Arm Injuries/etiology , Automobiles , Female , Humans , Male , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate orbital fractures that occurred in frontal automobile crashes and to determine the effects of frontal airbags on injury incidence and severity. METHODS: The National Automotive Sampling System database files from 1993 to 2000 were examined. Frontal crashes were selected that included drivers and front-seat passengers only and excluded ejected occupants and rollover crashes. Orbital fractures could be closed, open, displaced, or any combination of these and were identified by using the Abbreviated Injury Scale codes. RESULTS: The analysis included 12,429,580 front-seat occupants from 25,464 cases. Of all occupants who were exposed to an airbag deployment, 0.09% sustained an orbital fracture. In contrast, occupants who were not exposed to an airbag deployment were more than twice as likely to sustain an orbital fracture (0.22%). In addition to reduction in incidence, airbags were also shown to decrease the severity of orbital fractures that occupants sustained. Occupants exposed to airbag deployment mostly sustained closed, less severe fractures (61.9%), whereas occupants not exposed to airbag deployment sustained the majority as more severe, open, displaced, or comminuted fractures (61.3%). CONCLUSIONS: This article presents the most comprehensive study of orbital fractures in automobile crashes to date. It is shown that both the incidence and the overall severity of orbital fractures decreases considerably with exposure to airbag deployment. This is accomplished because the airbag minimizes occupant contact with the windshield and steering wheel, which are the two leading sources of orbital fractures for occupants not exposed to airbag deployment.
Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic , Air Bags/statistics & numerical data , Orbital Fractures/prevention & control , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Databases, Factual , Female , Government Agencies , Humans , Incidence , Injury Severity Score , Male , Orbital Fractures/epidemiology , Orbital Fractures/etiology , Seat Belts/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate eye injuries resulting from frontal automobile crashes and to determine the effects of frontal air bags. METHODS: The National Automotive Sampling System database files from January 1, 1993, through December 31, 1999, were examined in a 3-part study that included an investigation of 22 236 individual crashes that occurred in the United States. A new 4-level eye injury severity scale that quantifies injuries based on recovery time, need for surgery, and possible loss of sight was developed. RESULTS: Of all occupants who were exposed to an air bag deployment, 3% sustained an eye injury. In contrast, 2% of occupants not exposed to an air bag deployment sustained an eye injury. A closer examination of the type of eye injuries showed that there was a statistically significant increase in the risk of corneal abrasions for occupants who were exposed to an air bag compared with those who were not (P =.03). Of occupants exposed to an air bag deployment, 0.5% sustained a corneal abrasion compared with 0.04% of occupants who were not exposed to an air bag. CONCLUSIONS: Using the new injury levels, it was shown that although occupants exposed to an air bag deployment had a higher risk of sustaining minor eye injuries, the air bag appears to have provided a beneficial exchange by reducing the number of severe eye injuries.