ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to assess the validity of endoscopic bronchial biopsy specimens for the quantitation of nerves. To this end, endobronchial biopsy was simulated ex vivo on surgically resected lung specimens and nerve densities were compared in airway smooth muscle of biopsy and surrounding tissue. Specimens were stained immunohistochemically for the general neural marker protein gene product 9.5 (PGP 9.5) and for vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and nerve densities were quantitated using computer-assisted image analysis. Nerve density for total (PGP 9.5-immunoreactive) nerves was slightly higher in biopsies than in corresponding lung tissue, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.08). There was also no significant difference in the density of VIP-immunoreactive nerves (p=0.60). These findings support the use of endobronchial biopsy specimens to quantitate nerves in asthma and other airway diseases.
Subject(s)
Bronchi/innervation , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Biomarkers/analysis , Biopsy/methods , Bronchi/metabolism , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Muscle, Smooth/innervation , Muscle, Smooth/metabolism , Nerve Tissue Proteins/metabolism , Thiolester Hydrolases/metabolism , Ubiquitin Thiolesterase , Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced extracorporeal LDL/fibrinogen precipitation (HELP) eliminates selectively fibrinogen, LDL, cholesterol, triglycerides and LP(a) from blood plasma using extracorporeal circulation. The reduction of fibrinogen and LDL by about 50% after only one procedure immediately improves the hemorheological situation. METHOD: In a prospective, randomized, controlled study over a period of 3 months, 40 patients with nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) were randomly assigned to either HELP or hemodilution therapy to determine the efficacy of these two treatments on visual acuity and fields. RESULTS: After transformation of the Snellen acuity into logMAR units the statistical analysis did not show a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.48). An increase of the visual acuity by two or more lines was obtained in 9 patients (47.4%) of the HELP group, 10 (52.6%) remained stable and none got worse. In the hemodilution group, visual acuity increased in patients (33.4%), 9 (42.8%) remained stable and 5 (23.8%) experienced a decrease. The calculated mean sensitivity of visual fields at baseline improved statistically significantly (P < 0.01) in the HELP group from 6.83 +/- 4.52 dB to 8.27 +/- 4.89 dB, but did not change significantly in the hemodilution group (6.25 +/- 4.12 dB to 6.12 +/- 3.92 dB). CONCLUSION: The HELP system seems to be safe and more effective than hemodilution in improving the hemorheological and the functional situation in NAION and could be a promising regimen in the treatment of NAION.
