Facility-Level Variation in Hospitalization, Mortality, and Costs in the 30 Days After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights on Short-Term Healthcare Value From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking System (VA CART) Program.

BACKGROUND: Policies to reduce unnecessary hospitalizations after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are intended to improve healthcare value by reducing costs while maintaining patient outcomes. Whether facility-level hospitalization rates after PCI are associated with cost of care is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 32,080 patients who received PCI at any 1 of 62 Veterans Affairs hospitals from 2008 to 2011. We identified facility outliers for 30-day risk-standardized hospitalization, mortality, and cost. Compared with the risk-standardized average, 2 hospitals (3.2%) had a lower-than-expected hospitalization rate, and 2 hospitals (3.2%) had a higher-than-expected hospitalization rate. We observed no statistically significant variation in facility-level risk-standardized mortality. The facility-level unadjusted median per patient 30-day total cost was $23,820 (interquartile range, $19,604-$29,958). Compared with the risk-standardized average, 17 hospitals (27.4%) had lower-than-expected costs, and 14 hospitals (22.6%) had higher-than-expected costs. At the facility level, the index PCI accounted for 83.1% of the total cost (range, 60.3%-92.2%), whereas hospitalization after PCI accounted for only 5.8% (range, 2.0%-12.7%) of the 30-day total cost. Facilities with higher hospitalization rates were not more expensive (Spearman ρ=0.16; 95% confidence interval, -0.09 to 0.39; P=0.21). CONCLUSIONS: In this national study, hospitalizations in the 30 day after PCI accounted for only 5.8% of 30-day cost, and facility-level cost was not correlated with hospitalization rates. This challenges the focus on reducing hospitalizations after PCI as an effective means of improving healthcare value. Opportunities remain to improve PCI value by reducing the variation in total cost of PCI without compromising patient outcomes.

1-year risk-adjusted mortality and costs of percutaneous coronary intervention in the Veterans Health Administration: insights from the VA CART Program.

BACKGROUND: There is significant interest in measuring health care value, but this concept has not been operationalized in specific patient cohorts. The longitudinal outcomes and costs for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) provide an opportunity to measure an aspect of health care value. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated variations in 1-year outcomes (risk-adjusted mortality) and risk-standardized costs of care for all patients undergoing PCI in the Veterans Affairs (VA) system from 2007 to 2010. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated all veterans undergoing PCI at any of 60 hospitals in the VA health care system, using data from the national VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) program. Primary outcomes were 1-year mortality and costs following PCI. Risk-standardized mortality and cost ratios were calculated, adjusting for cardiac and noncardiac comorbidities. RESULTS: A median of 261 PCIs were performed in the 60 hospitals during the study period. Median 1-year unadjusted hospital mortality rate was 6.13%. Four hospitals were significantly above the 1-year risk-standardized median mortality rate, with median mortality ratios ranging from 1.23 to 1.28. No hospitals were significantly below median mortality. Median 1-year total unadjusted hospital costs were $46,302 per patient. There were 16 hospitals above and 19 hospitals below the risk-standardized median cost, with risk-standardized ratios ranging from 0.45 to 2.09, reflecting a much larger magnitude of variability in costs than in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: There is much smaller variation in 1-year risk adjusted mortality than in risk-standardized costs after PCI in the VA. These findings suggest that there are opportunities to improve PCI value by reducing costs without compromising outcomes. This approach to evaluating outcomes and costs together may be a model for other health systems and accountable care organizations interested in operationalizing value measurement.

A national clinical quality program for Veterans Affairs catheterization laboratories (from the Veterans Affairs clinical assessment, reporting, and tracking program).

A "learning health care system", as outlined in a recent Institute of Medicine report, harnesses real-time clinical data to continuously measure and improve clinical care. However, most current efforts to understand and improve the quality of care rely on retrospective chart abstractions complied long after the provision of clinical care. To align more closely with the goals of a learning health care system, we present the novel design and initial results of the Veterans Affairs (VA) Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) program-a national clinical quality program for VA cardiac catheterization laboratories that harnesses real-time clinical data to support clinical care and quality-monitoring efforts. Integrated within the VA electronic health record, the CART program uses a specialized software platform to collect real-time patient and procedural data for all VA patients undergoing coronary procedures in VA catheterization laboratories. The program began in 2005 and currently contains data on 434,967 catheterization laboratory procedures, including 272,097 coronary angiograms and 86,481 percutaneous coronary interventions, performed by 801 clinicians on 246,967 patients. We present the initial data from the CART program and describe 3 quality-monitoring programs that use its unique characteristics-procedural and complications feedback to individual labs, coronary device surveillance, and major adverse event peer review. The VA CART program is a novel approach to electronic health record design that supports clinical care, quality, and safety in VA catheterization laboratories. Its approach holds promise in achieving the goals of a learning health care system.

Improving healthcare systems' disclosures of large-scale adverse events: a Department of Veterans Affairs leadership, policymaker, research and stakeholder partnership.

BACKGROUND: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mandates disclosure of large-scale adverse events to patients, even if risk of harm is not clearly present. Concerns about past disclosures warranted further examination of the impact of this policy. OBJECTIVE: Through a collaborative partnership between VA leaders, policymakers, researchers and stakeholders, the objective was to empirically identify critical aspects of disclosure processes as a first step towards improving future disclosures. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants at nine VA facilities where recent disclosures took place. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-seven stakeholders participated in the interviews: 38 employees, 28 leaders (from facilities, regions and national offices), 27 Veteran patients and family members, and four congressional staff members. APPROACH: Facility and regional leaders were interviewed by telephone, followed by a two-day site visit where employees, patients and family members were interviewed face-to-face. National leaders and congressional staff also completed telephone interviews. Interviews were analyzed using rapid qualitative assessment processes. Themes were mapped to the stages of the Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication model: pre-crisis, initial event, maintenance, resolution and evaluation. KEY RESULTS: Many areas for improvement during disclosure were identified, such as preparing facilities better (pre-crisis), creating rapid communications, modifying disclosure language, addressing perceptions of harm, reducing complexity, and seeking assistance from others (initial event), managing communication with other stakeholders (maintenance), minimizing effects on staff and improving trust (resolution), and addressing facilities' needs (evaluation). CONCLUSIONS: Through the partnership, five recommendations to improve disclosures during each stage of communication have been widely disseminated throughout the VA using non-academic strategies. Some improvements have been made; other recommendations will be addressed through implementation of a large-scale adverse event disclosure toolkit. These toolkit strategies will enable leaders to provide timely and transparent information to patients and families, while reducing the burden on employees and the healthcare system during these events.

The current and future landscape of urinary thromboxane testing to evaluate atherothrombotic risk.

Biomarker testing for efficacy of therapy is an accepted way for clinicians to individualize dosing to genetic and/or environmental factors that may be influencing a treatment regimen. Aspirin is used by nearly 43 million Americans on a regular basis to reduce risks associated with various atherothrombotic diseases. Despite its widespread use, many clinicians are unaware of the link between suboptimal response to aspirin therapy and increased risk for inferior clinical outcomes in several disease states, and biomarker testing for efficacy of aspirin therapy is not performed as routinely as efficacy testing in other therapeutic areas. This article reviews the clinical and laboratory aspects of determining whole-body thromboxane production, particularly as it pertains to efficacy assessment of aspirin responsiveness.

Mental health needs of returning veterans.

As more service members return from war zones around the world, clinicians must be prepared to treat them. Veterans with PTSD and other mental disorders must overcome the stigma associated with seeking treatment, and clinicians must equip these patients and their family members to deal with challenging symptoms. Clinicians should learn about military culture and jargon to better understand these patients and should become familiar with veteran resources to direct veterans and their families to the appropriate services. Clinicians may also need to communicate with their patients' employers to help both parties deal with illnesses such as PTSD. A coordinated effort is needed to meet the needs of veterans and their families, and clinicians play an integral role in recognizing and meeting those needs.

Feasibility of proactive medical device surveillance: the VA Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking (CART) program.

BACKGROUND: Timely identification and reporting of medical device problems is critical to postmarket device surveillance programs to maximize patient safety. Cardiac catheterization laboratories are high-device utilization areas well suited for device surveillance. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility of the national VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) system, embedded in the electronic health record of all 76 VA cardiac catheterization laboratories, to document unexpected problems with medical devices at the point of care. METHODS: We evaluated 260,258 consecutive cardiac catheterization and/or percutaneous coronary intervention procedures on 175,098 Veterans between August 2006 and February 2012. Unexpected device problems (UDPs) encountered for any equipment used during a procedure were entered by clinicians at the point of care as part of regular care documentation. All UDPs were reviewed in collaboration with the FDA to ascertain the likelihood of a device defect (eg, in manufacture or design) and/or contributing to a procedural complication (level I, unlikely; level II, possibly; level III, likely). RESULTS: Of the 260,258 procedure reports, 974 (0.37%) UDP's were reported by 71 (92.2%) of the 76 VA hospitals. After triage, 739 (75.9%) were deemed level I, 196 (20.1%) level II, and 39 (4.0%) level III. Of the 39 level III reports, 12 (30.7%) are in the submission phase as a FDA MedWatch report. The number of monthly UDP reports increased significantly from 2006 to 2012 (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Leveraging a clinical application embedded in the electronic health record and in collaboration with FDA, a proactive national cardiac device surveillance program has been successfully implemented in the VA.

Commentary: building human capital: discovery, learning, and professional satisfaction.

Physician satisfaction is an important contributor to a well-functioning health system. Mohr and Burgess report that physicians in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) who spend time in research have greater overall job satisfaction, that satisfaction tracks with aggregate facility research funding, and that satisfaction is higher among physicians working in VA facilities located on the same campus or within walking distance of an affiliated medical school. An environment conducive to research therefore not only advances science but also seems to be a key element of physician satisfaction. In addition to advancing scientific discovery and promoting greater physician satisfaction, these findings suggest that an environment of discovery and learning may yield benefits beyond specific academic endeavors and contribute more broadly to supporting health system performance.

Strategies from a nationwide health information technology implementation: the VA CART story.

The VA Cardiovascular Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) system is a customized electronic medical record system which provides standardized report generation for cardiac catheterization procedures, serves as a national data repository, and is the centerpiece of a national quality improvement program. Like many health information technology projects, CART implementation did not proceed without some barriers and resistance. We describe the nationwide implementation of CART at the 77 VA hospitals which perform cardiac catheterizations in three phases: (1) strategic collaborations; (2) installation; and (3) adoption. Throughout implementation, success required a careful balance of technical, clinical, and organizational factors. We offer strategies developed through CART implementation which are broadly applicable to technology projects aimed at improving the quality, reliability, and efficiency of health care.

Mortality based on the presenting electrocardiogram in patients with myocardial infarction in the troponin era.

BACKGROUND: Studies reporting short-term mortality in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) based on the initial electrocardiogram (ECG) are often limited by requiring an ischemic ECG for inclusion. Because few patients with normal or nonspecific findings were included, outcomes in these patients are less clear, especially in the troponin era. METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed as having MI using troponin I (TnI) over a 6-year period were included and classified into 8 mutually exclusive groups based on the initial ECG using standard criteria. Patients were included in only 1 group. The MI size was estimated using multiples of peak creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), and 30-day mortality rate was assessed. RESULTS: Among 1641 patients with MI, patients with ST elevation represented only 22% of all MIs. Patients with ST elevation had the largest MI size, with 2 of 3 having a peak CK-MB greater than 10 times normal. In contrast, most of the patients representing all the other ECG groups had a peak CK-MB less than 5 times normal, with approximately 1 of 3 having no CK-MB elevation and were diagnosed by TnI elevation alone. Patients could be separated into a high-risk group (ST elevation, ischemia, other, or left bundle-branch block), in which mortality rate exceeded 9% (mean, 14%), and a lower-risk group (prior MI, left ventricular hypertrophy, nonspecific changes, and normal), in which the 30-day mortality rate averaged 6% (P < .001; range, 5.23%-7.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Specific ECG findings other than ischemia portend poor outcomes in patients with MI. Once MI is diagnosed, patients are no longer low risk.

Risk of adverse outcomes associated with concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors following acute coronary syndrome.

CONTEXT: Prior mechanistic studies reported that omeprazole decreases the platelet inhibitory effects of clopidogrel, yet the clinical significance of these findings is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes of patients taking clopidogrel with or without a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) after hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Retrospective cohort study of 8205 patients with ACS taking clopidogrel after discharge from 127 Veterans Affairs hospitals between October 1, 2003, and January 31, 2006. Vital status information was available for all patients through September 30, 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All-cause mortality or rehospitalization for ACS. RESULTS: Of 8205 patients taking clopidogrel after discharge, 63.9% (n = 5244) were prescribed PPI at discharge, during follow-up, or both and 36.1% (n = 2961) were not prescribed PPI. Death or rehospitalization for ACS occurred in 20.8% (n = 615) of patients taking clopidogrel without PPI and 29.8% (n = 1561) of patients taking clopidogrel plus PPI. In multivariable analyses, use of clopidogrel plus PPI was associated with an increased risk of death or rehospitalization for ACS compared with use of clopidogrel without PPI (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.41). Among patients taking clopidogrel after hospital discharge and prescribed PPI at any point during follow-up (n = 5244), periods of use of clopidogrel plus PPI (compared with periods of use of clopidogrel without PPI) were associated with a higher risk of death or rehospitalization for ACS (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.10-1.46). In analyses of secondary outcomes, patients taking clopidogrel plus PPI had a higher risk of hospitalizations for recurrent ACS compared with patients taking clopidogrel without PPI (14.6% vs 6.9%; AOR, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.57-2.20]) and revascularization procedures (15.5% vs 11.9%; AOR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.30-1.71]), but not for all-cause mortality (19.9% vs 16.6%; AOR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.80-1.05]). The association between use of clopidogrel plus PPI and increased risk of adverse outcomes also was consistent using a nested case-control study design (AOR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14-1.54). In addition, use of PPI without clopidogrel was not associated with death or rehospitalization for ACS among patients not taking clopidogrel after hospital discharge (n = 6450) (AOR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.85-1.13). CONCLUSION: Concomitant use of clopidogrel and PPI after hospital discharge for ACS was associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes than use of clopidogrel without PPI, suggesting that use of PPI may be associated with attenuation of benefits of clopidogrel after ACS.

Value of simultaneous functional assessment in association with acute rest perfusion imaging for predicting short- and long-term outcomes in emergency department patients with chest pain.

BACKGROUND: Rest tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has significant utility for clinical decision making in emergency department chest pain patients. The role of functional data, commonly acquired with perfusion, has not been systematically evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Low- to moderate-risk patients undergoing rest MPI for risk stratification were included. The patients' MPI findings were classified as normal (normal perfusion or function), abnormal (perfusion defect with abnormal regional function), or discordant (perfusion defect with normal regional function). Ejection fraction was determined from the gated MPI studies. Events based on perfusion classifications and ejection fraction were evaluated. A total of 2,826 consecutive patients (abnormal MPI results in 40%, normal in 32%, and discordant in 27%) were studied. Outcomes were similar for those with normal MPI results versus those with discordant MPI results (myocardial infarction [MI] based on troponin I [TnI], 3.5% vs 4.0%; MI based on creatine kinase-MB, 1.5% vs 1.7%; revascularization, 5.2% vs 5.5%; and MI/revascularization based on TnI, 7.9% vs 8.1%) (P = not significant for all). Both groups had significantly fewer events (P < .001 for all) when compared with patients with abnormal MPI studies (MI based on TnI, 15%; MI based on creatine kinase-MB, 10%; revascularization, 17%; MI based on TnI or revascularization, 24%). The mortality rate was not different among the 3 groups. Multivariate analysis showed that mild/moderate and severe systolic dysfunction were independent predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality rates (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The concurrent evaluation of perfusion and function (regional and global) with MPI provides significant risk/outcome predictive power.

Comparison of the modification of diet in renal disease and the Cockcroft-Gault equations for predicting mortality in patients admitted for exclusion of myocardial ischemia.

Renal dysfunction is an important predictor of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Until recently, the Cockcroft-Gault (C-G) equation has been most commonly used to estimate renal function, although the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation is now recommended. Which equation better predicts mortality is unclear. Consecutive patients without ST elevation on the initial electrocardiogram admitted for exclusion of myocardial ischemia were included. Admission creatinine was used to estimate renal function, and 30-day and 1-year mortality were compared after classifying patients as having no (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] > or =60 ml/min/m(2)), moderate (eGFR 30 to 59 ml/min/ m(2)), or severe (eGFR <30 ml/min/m(2)) renal dysfunction using the 2 equations. Of the 4,343 patients (49% women, 64% African-American) included, 16% had troponin I elevations consistent with myocardial infarction, and 1-year mortality was 10%. Agreement between the 2 equations was high (r = 0.87 p <0.001, concordance 86%). Mortality was similar in the 2 renal function classifications, with no significant differences based on race or troponin I status at 30 days or 1 year. However, the area of the receiver operator characteristic curve was significantly larger for predicting 1-year mortality with the C-G equation (0.75 [0.72 to 0.77] vs 0.71 [0.68 to 0.73]; p <0.01); both were superior to creatinine alone (0.68 [0.66 to 0.71]; p <0.01 for both C-G and MDRD). Results for 30-day mortality were similar. In conclusion, the C-G equation appears to be superior to the MDRD equation for predicting short- and long-term mortality in patients admitted for exclusion of ischemia, although differences are minor.

Predictive power of systolic function and congestive heart failure in patients with patients admitted for chest pain without ST elevation in the troponin era.

BACKGROUND: Impaired systolic function and congestive heart failure (CHF) are powerful predictors of adverse outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). However, there are little data in which both of these variables were assessed in heterogenous patients admitted from the emergency department for exclusion of ischemia. METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted for MI exclusion who had ejection fraction (EF) measured were included. Systolic dysfunction was defined as EF <40%. Congestive heart failure was diagnosed based on clinical or x-ray evidence in the first 24 hours. Multivariate analysis was used to determine predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: Of the 4,343 consecutive patients admitted, 3,682 (85%) had EF assessed (including 97% of the troponin I [TnI]-positive patients) and were included. One-year unadjusted mortality was 9.5%, but in the presence of systolic dysfunction or CHF, it increased to 22% and 26%, respectively. The most important multivariate predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality were similar and included CHF (OR for 1-year mortality 2.5, 95% CI 1.9-3.4), TnI elevations (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.5-2.6), and severe renal failure (OR 5.2, 95% CI 3.7-7.2). Systolic dysfunction was predictive of 1 year (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.4-2.5) but not 30-day mortality. Results were similar in the 3,018 patients who were troponin-negative. CONCLUSIONS: Congestive heart failure is an independent predictor of both short- and long-term mortality in patients admitted for MI exclusion. In contrast, systolic dysfunction predicts long-term but not short-term mortality. One cannot be used as a surrogate for the other.