The last days: The medical response of United States and allied military teams during the Afghanistan Exodus.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to describe the United States and allied military medical response during the withdrawal from Afghanistan. BACKGROUND: The military withdrawal from Afghanistan concluded with severe hostilities resulting in numerous civilian and military casualties. The clinical care provided by coalition forces capitalized on decades of lessons learned and enabled unprecedented accomplishments. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational analysis, casualty numbers, and operative information was collected and reported from military medical assets in Kabul, Afghanistan. The continuum of medical care and the trauma system, from the point of injury back to the United States was captured and described. RESULTS: Prior to a large suicide bombing resulting in a mass casualty event, the international medical teams managed distinct 45 trauma incidents involving nearly 200 combat and non-combat civilian and military patients over the preceding 3 months. Military medical personnel treated 63 casualties from the Kabul airport suicide attack and performed 15 trauma operations. US air transport teams evacuated 37 patients within 15 hours of the attack. CONCLUSION: Lessons learned from the last 20 years of combat casualty care were successfully implemented during the culmination of the Afghanistan conflict. Ultimately, the effort, teamwork, and system adaptability exemplify not only the attitudes and character of service members who provide modern combat casualty care but also the paramount importance of the battlefield learning health care system. A continued posture to maintain military surgical preparedness in unique environments remain crucial as the US military prepares for the future.Retrospective observational analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level V.

Primary Lung Hernia After Blunt Chest Trauma: Chest Wall Repair Strategies.

Lung herniation is a rare pathology seen after trauma. A case of acquired lung hernia is presented after blunt thoracic trauma that was repaired primarily. Surgical management and decision-making for this process are discussed.

Comparison of Outcomes Between the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and an Emergency General Surgery Registry.

BACKGROUND: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) has become a prevalent tool for quality improvement. At our tertiary military hospital, NSQIP collects 20% of eligible cases. We implemented an emergency general surgery (EGS) registry to prospectively review all EGS cases. We compared our EGS registry with NSQIP, hypothesizing that NSQIP sampling under-represents EGS outcomes. METHODS: A formal EGS Process Improvement Program was implemented in 2016. From 2016 to 2018, the four most common operations were laparoscopic appendectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, surgery for small bowel obstruction, and nonelective hernia repair. Outcomes were compared between the EGS registry and NSQIP abstracted cases. RESULTS: In 2016, the EGS registry identified 11/112 (9.8%) patients with a complication. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program abstracted 16% of EGS cases with 16.7% (3/18) of patients having a complication. In 2017, the EGS registry identified 10/87 (11.5%) cases with complications. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program abstracted 23% of EGS with zero complications. In 2018, the EGS registry identified 9.5% of 74 cases with complications. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program abstracted 15% of EGS cases with zero complications. CONCLUSIONS: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program did not capture many important EGS outcomes. In 2 of 3 years, NSQIP did not identify a single complication for EGS. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program alone may be insufficient to target EGS improvements.

Surgery at Sea: Exploring the Training Gap for Isolated Military Surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: Newly-graduated military general surgeons often find themselves isolated at sea, solely responsible for all surgical care of several thousand sailors, regardless of the surgical specialty training required for any individual procedure. This educational need assessment explored trends in afloat surgical care over the last 25 years, and assessed trainees' preparedness for their expected role as an isolated surgeon. DESIGN: A sample of deidentified US Navy Ship's Surgeon case logs were reviewed to determine afloat case load trends in 5 common afloat case categories (urologic/gynecologic, anorectal, hernia, appendectomy, and hand/orthopedic/trauma) from 1990s to 2017. Individual procedures were mapped to American College of Surgeons/Military Health System Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes line items to ensure afloat-relevant skills were identified. Recent military resident case logs were then compared with afloat cases to evaluate relevant trainee experience. SETTING: US Navy ships at sea from 1995 to 2017. PARTICIPANTS: US Navy afloat-deployed surgeons, totaling 1340 cases within the study period. RESULTS: Case log analysis of 1340 surgeries, comprising >200 months at sea, reflected 46 named procedures; 34 of 46 (74%) correlated to an intraoperative knowledge, skills, and attitudes item. The most common surgeries were vasectomy, (304 of 1340, 23%). No difference in case mix was apparent comparing pre- and post-2000 deployments (representing afloat laparoscopic integration) in 4 of 5 categories, while hernias proportionally declined. Case volume per deployment markedly declined overall (p < 0.001) and in each category. Resident case log analysis from 2012 to 2016 showed experience was limited in urologic/gynecologic, orthopedic, and open appendectomy categories. CONCLUSIONS: No formal case repository exists for afloat surgery, making detailed analysis problematic. Current training provides excellent surgical education but minimal exposure to rare-but-real cases expected on deployments, which may not translate to competency for the isolated, afloat surgeon. Military surgical leadership should embrace training for these cases and assertively invest in the development of the military's newest surgeons.

Treatment of Suspected Invasive Fungal Infection in War Wounds.

Invasive fungal wound infections (IFIs) were an unexpected complication associated with blast-related wounds during Operation Enduring Freedom. Between 2010 and 2012, IFI incidence rates were as high as 10-12% for patients injured during Operation Enduring Freedom and admitted to the intensive care unit at the Landstuhl Regional Medical Center. Independent risk factors for the development of IFIs include dismounted blast injuries, above knee amputations and massive (>20 units) packed red blood cell transfusions within 24 hours after injury. The Joint Trauma System developed a Clinical Practice Guideline on IFI prevention, identification and management. Aggressive and frequent surgical debridement remains the primary therapy accompanied by topical antifungal therapy (e.g., Dakins solution). Empiric systemic antifungal therapy with both liposomal amphotericin B and an intravenous broad-spectrum triazole (e.g., voriconazole or posaconazole) should be administered when there is strong suspicion of IFI based on the occurrence of recurrent wound necrosis following serial surgical debridements, since many cases involve multiple fungal species. Other recommendations include: (1) early tissue sampling for wound histopathology and fungal cultures, (2) early consultation with infectious disease specialists, and (3) coordination with surgical pathology and clinical microbiology.

Development of an emergency general surgery process improvement program.

BACKGROUND: The Joint Trauma System has demonstrated improved outcomes through coordinated research and process improvement programs. With fewer combat trauma patients, our military American College of Surgeons level 2 trauma center's ability to maintain a strong trauma Process Improvement (PI) program has become difficult. As emergency general surgery (EGS) patients are similar to trauma patients, our Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (TACS) service developed an EGS PI program analogous to what is done in trauma. We describe the implementation of our novel EGS PI program and its effect on institutional PI proficiency. METHODS: An EGS registry was developed in 2013. Inclusion criteria were based on AAST published literature. In 2015, EGS registrar and PI coordinator positions were developed and filled with existing trauma staff. A formal EGS PI program began January 1, 2016. Pre- and post-program data was compared to determine the effect including EGS PI events had on increasing yield into our trauma PI program. RESULTS: In 2016, TACS saw 1001 EGS consults. Four hundred forty-four met criteria for registry inclusion. Eighty-two patients had 131 PI events; re-admission within 30 days, unplanned therapeutic intervention, and unplanned ICU admission were the most common events. Capture of EGS PI events yielded a 49% increase compared with 2015. CONCLUSION: Overall patient volume and PI events post EGS PI program initiation exceeded those prior to implementation. These data suggest that extending trauma PI principles to EGS may be beneficial in maintaining inter-war military and/or lower volume trauma center readiness.

Identification of Abnormal Biliary Anatomy Utilizing Real-Time Near-Infrared Cholangiography: A Report of Two Cases.

Biliary duct anomalies are commonly encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Advancements in the field of surgery allow for enhanced intraoperative detection of these abnormalities. Fluorophore injection and near-infrared (NIR) imaging can provide real-time intraoperative anatomic feedback without intraoperative delays and ionizing radiation. This report details two cases where the PINPOINT Endoscopic Fluorescence Imaging System (NOVADAQ, Ontario, Canada) was used to identify anomalies of the biliary tree and guide operative decision-making.

Risk factors for urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common entity following surgery, particularly after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Here the intent is to investigate the incidence of POUR in all comers at a single institution following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent laparoscopic hernia repair at our institution from January 2010 through December 2013 was performed. POUR was defined as the inability to spontaneously urinate following surgery, requiring straight catheterization or placement of a Foley catheter. Perioperative data including narcotic use, operative time, type of mesh, and intraoperative fluid use were also recorded for each patient. RESULTS: A total of 346 patients underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the specified time period, 340 patients were included in this study. The incidence of POUR after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair at our institution was 8.2 % (n = 28) with the most common presentation of POUR being failure to void (n = 23). Postoperative narcotic use of 6.5 mg or greater of morphine or morphine equivalent was associated with higher risk of POUR via ROC analysis (OR 2.5, 95 % CI 1.2-5.6, p = 0.025). In univariate analysis, age greater than 50 years was also a risk factor for developing POUR (OR 2.8, 95 % CI 1.2-6.4, p = 0.02). Factors not found to be significant included intraoperative IV fluids, history of BPH, unilateral versus bilateral repair, and preoperative void time in relation to surgery start. CONCLUSIONS: Minimizing postoperative narcotic medications may reduce the risk of developing POUR after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. If possible surgeons should consider non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, or regional anesthetic blocks to minimize postoperative narcotic requirements.

Hyperacute adrenal insufficiency after hemorrhagic shock exists and is associated with poor outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Adrenal insufficiency (AI) has been extensively described in sepsis but not in acute hemorrhage. We sought to determine the incidence of hyperacute AI (HAI) immediately after hemorrhage and its association with mortality. METHODS: Patients with acute traumatic hemorrhagic shock presenting to the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center prospectively had serum cortisol levels collected on admission. Inclusion criteria were hypotension and active hemorrhage. Clinicians were blinded to results, and no patient received steroids in the acute phase. The primary outcome measure was death from hemorrhage within 24 hours of admission. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled during an 8-month period. Mean admission cortisol level was 18.3 ± 8.9 µg/dL. Acute mortality rate from hemorrhage was 27%. Overall mortality rate was 37%. Severe HAI (serum cortisol level <10 µg/dL) was present in 10 patients (17%). Relative HAI (<25 µg/dL) was present in 51 patients (86%). Those who died of acute hemorrhage had significantly lower mean cortisol levels (11.4 ± 6.2 µg/dL vs. 20.9 ± 8.4 µg/dL, p < 0.001) as did patients who ultimately died in the hospital (12.8 ± 7.6 µg/dL vs. 21.6 ± 8.1 µg/dL, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, cortisol levels were associated with mortality from acute hemorrhage, with an odds ratio of 1.17 (95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.35). Adjusted receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that serum cortisol has a 91% accuracy in differentiating survivors of acute hemorrhage from nonsurvivors. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to report that AI occurs immediately after acute injury during hemorrhagic shock and is strongly associated with mortality. HAI may be a marker of depth of shock but is potentially rapidly modifiable as opposed to other markers, such as lactate or base deficit. Further work is needed to determine whether steroid administration can change outcome in selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III.