ABSTRACT
Transient visual phenomena in later life due to a visual aura in migraine are not uncommon and can also occur without headache. This migraine with aura is not always recognized as such. Since visual phenomena can also have a variety of other causes, they can present a diagnostic dilemma in both primary and secondary care. Visual aura phenomena have various and often complex manifestations and are usually observed binocularly. In case of transient visual phenomena, the patient's history is of utmost importance to determine whether there is a mono- or binocular cause of the complaints. Timely recognition of visual phenomena in the context of migraine can prevent unnecessary diagnostics and treatments.
Subject(s)
Migraine with Aura/diagnosis , Symptom Assessment/methods , Aged , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Medical History Taking , Migraine with Aura/etiology , Primary Health Care , Secondary Care , Vision DisparityABSTRACT
A 38-year-old man with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) developed a tumefactive demyelinating lesion (TDL) after being clinically and radiologically stable on fingolimod for the last five years. TDLs in MS tend to occur early on in the disease and are uncommon in longstanding MS. Compared to other immune modifying drugs used in MS, there is a relatively high and still increasing number of reports describing the development of TDL under treatment with fingolimod, suggesting a causal relation.
Subject(s)
Brain/pathology , Fingolimod Hydrochloride/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/drug therapy , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/pathology , Adult , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , MaleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Intestinal malrotation is a congenital intestinal abnormality caused by abnormal intestinal rotation during foetal development. CASE DESCRIPTION: We describe a 20-year-old woman with many years' history of abdominal symptoms and eating disorders that were labelled as psychosomatic following repeated and extensive investigations. The diagnosis of malrotation was only made after an emergency laparotomy, with right hemicolectomy for intestinal necrosis. CONCLUSION: The reason that diagnosis was missed in this patient was probably not only because malrotation is accompanied by non-specific symptoms. The cognitive strategies used by doctors to make a diagnosis on the basis of symptoms may also have led to ignoring details that did not fit, and to clinging to earlier diagnoses. Furthermore, eating disorders and gastrointestinal disorders are sometimes difficult to distinguish and are often linked. Even with extra vigilance a misdiagnosis cannot always be avoided.
