Significant increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with fibrates is associated with low pretreatment high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: findings from an outpatient clinic setting.

BACKGROUND: Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) observed in large randomized controlled trials using fibrates has varied. Inconsistent cardiovascular outcomes have also been the common theme of these trials. Subgroup analysis of even the negative trials, however, reveals significant reduction in cardiovascular disease in patients with low HDL-C and high triglycerides. We wished to study HDL-C change following fibrate therapy in our lipid clinic and determine the factors associated with HDL-C change. METHODS: Data were collected from case notes of patients started on fibrates (n=248) between 2002 and 2008 in the lipid clinics at Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust. Regression analyses were carried out to determine factors associated with changes in HDL-C. RESULTS: Linear regression analysis revealed that HDL-C change was associated with pretreatment HDL-C (P<0.001), diabetes (P=0.004) and treatment duration (P=0.036). Multiple regression analysis with all of the factors in the model suggested that they were independent. Patients with a baseline HDL-C <1.0 mmol/L showed a greater HDL-C increase when compared to patients with a baseline HDL-C ≥1.0 mmol/L; HDL-C <1.0 mmol/L (increase of 0.15 mmol/L, linear regression: c=0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.30, P<0.001) and HDL-C ≥1.0 (increase of 0.002 mmol/L, linear regression: reference category). A similar relationship between change in HDL-C and baseline HDL-C was observed within groups stratified by patient characteristics (apart from those on concurrent statin therapy and females). CONCLUSIONS: Our results may explain the discrepancies observed in some randomized controlled trials whereby subgroup analysis of patients with the metabolic syndrome appeared to show benefit whereas this was absent in the total cohort. Thus, future interventional studies using fibrates should perhaps focus on patients with low HDL-C levels.

Daily and intermittent rosuvastatin 5 mg therapy in statin intolerant patients: an observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and tolerability of rosuvastatin 5 mg at daily and non-daily dosing regimens. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective survey was conducted at nine primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare centres in the United Kingdom. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in lipid fractions from baseline values after more than 3 months' treatment. RESULTS: A total of 325 patients were identified. These patients were aged 63 ± 10 years, 50% male and prescription was mostly for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) (59%). Co-morbidities included: established CVD present in 41%, type 2 diabetes mellitus (15%), hypertension (74%) and smoking (9%). Adverse effects had been documented to simvastatin (75%) or atorvastatin (63%). A total of 289 patients (89%) tolerated rosuvastatin well and were still adherent after a median follow-up of 14.9 (3-79) months. The remainder (n = 36; 11%) discontinued the medication after median 5 months' treatment due to adverse effects. Efficacy was assessed in 224 patients who had adequate data. Baseline lipids were total cholesterol (TC) 7.41 ± 1.50 mmol/L, triglycerides (TG) 2.26 (range 0.36-18.4) mmol/L; high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) 1.43 ± 0.47 mmol/L and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) 4.76 ± 1.38 mmol/L. Daily rosuvastatin (n = 134) reduced mean TC by 31%, TG 15% and LDL-C 43% (p < 0.001). Rosuvastatin 5 mg 2-3 times weekly (n = 79) reduced TC 26%, TG 16% and LDL-C 32% (p < 0.001). Weekly rosuvastatin (n = 11) reduced TC 17%, LDL-C by 23% (p < 0.001) but had no effect on TGs. Targets were attained in 17% of CHD-risk equivalent patients and 41% of primary prevention patients by National Cholesterol Education Program criteria and 27% and 68% using UK targets. No myositis or rhabdomyolysis was observed and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and creatine kinase (CK) were similar to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective observational multicentre study, rosuvastatin 5 mg was found to be safe and biochemically effective either as daily or intermittent therapy in patients intolerant to other conventional statin regimens.