Antibiotics for inflammatory bowel disease: Current status.

There is abundant literature reporting about the use of antibiotics in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but their role in the management of IBD is not entirely clear. Diverse infectious organisms have been implicated in the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease. Also, infections are believed to be a trigger for flares of ulcerative colitis. The benefit of the routine use of antibiotics in IBD is equivocal. However, there are certain situations, where antibiotics have a clear role and evidence of benefit: perianal fistula, intra-abdominal abscesses in Crohn's disease, acute pouchitis and infection-related flares. However, there is a lack of supportive evidence for the routine use of antibiotics in all disease-related flares. Evidence indicates a lack of benefit of intravenous antibiotics in acute severe ulcerative colitis and only limited benefit in active ulcerative colitis. Limited evidence suggests the role of a combination of oral antibiotics in pediatric ulcerative colitis. Certain targeted antibiotic regimens have been used in IBD. In ulcerative colitis, limited evidence suggests the benefit of the use of an antibiotic cocktail directed against Fusobacterium varium. Therapy directed against Escherichia coli does not seem to have a benefit in inflammatory Crohn's disease. In Crohn's disease, antimycobacterial therapy may result in symptomatic improvement but no durable benefit. Antitubercular therapy (ATT), on the contrary, may result in fibrotic transformation, suggesting a need to avoid misdiagnosis and limit the duration of ATT in Crohn's disease. This review assesses the published literature with respect to antibiotic use and provides guidance to clinicians in appropriate antibiotic use in various situations in the setting of IBD.

Clinical and Radiological Parameters to Discriminate Tuberculous Peritonitis and Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.

It is challenging to differentiate between tuberculous peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis due to their insidious nature and intersecting symptoms. Computed tomography (CT) is the modality of choice in evaluating diffuse peritoneal disease. We conducted an ambispective analysis of patients suspected as having tuberculous peritonitis or peritoneal tuberculosis between Jan 2020 to Dec 2021. The study aimed to identify the clinical and radiological features differentiating the two entities. We included 44 cases of tuberculous peritonitis and 45 cases of peritoneal carcinomatosis, with a median age of 31.5 (23.5-40) and 52 (46-61) years, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). Fever, past history of tuberculosis, and loss of weight were significantly associated with tuberculous peritonitis (p ≤ 0.001, p = 0.038 and p = 0.001). Pain in the abdomen and history of malignancy were significantly associated with peritoneal carcinomatosis (p = 0.038 and p ≤ 0.001). Ascites was the most common radiological finding. Loculated ascites, splenomegaly and conglomeration of lymph nodes predicted tuberculous peritonitis significantly (p ≤ 0.001, p = 0.010, p = 0.038). Focal liver lesion(s) and nodular omental involvement were significantly associated with peritoneal carcinomatosis (p = 0.011, p = 0.029). The use of clinical features in conjunction with radiological findings provide better diagnostic yields because of overlapping imaging findings.