A Case of Idiopathic Sequential Profound Bilateral Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Occurring 37 Days After Unilateral Presentation.

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is a common disorder; however, sequential, bilateral presentation of the disease is rarer than unilateral presentation. Clinical otologists usually focus on treating the side with impaired hearing when patients first present with unilateral SSNHL, and therefore, may not warn patients of the possibility of subsequent hearing impairment in the contralateral ear. Furthermore, it is professionally discouraging when a patient presents with profound, sequential SSNHL after initial treatment. This may adversely impact the doctor-patient relationship, even if the patient is offered the best possible care from their first visit. Herein, we report the case of a patient with profound, idiopathic, bilateral SSNHL with a time interval of 37 days between involvement of both ears. Even though high-dose steroids were administered intraorally and intratympanically, the patient's hearing was not restored, and the patient eventually required bilateral cochlear implant surgery. Our report demonstrates that sequential, profound, bilateral SSNHL may manifest without any specific signs.

Acoustic analyses of snoring sounds using a smartphone in patients undergoing septoplasty and turbinoplasty.

PURPOSE: Several studies have been performed using recently developed smartphone-based acoustic analysis techniques. We investigated the effects of septoplasty and turbinoplasty in patients with nasal septal deviation and turbinate hypertrophy accompanied by snoring by recording the sounds of snoring using a smartphone and performing acoustic analysis. METHODS: A total of 15 male patients who underwent septoplasty with turbinoplasty for snoring and nasal obstruction were included in this prospective study. Preoperatively and 2 months after surgery, their bed partners or caregivers were instructed to record the snoring sounds. The intensity (dB), formant frequencies (F1, F2, F3, and F4), spectrogram pattern, and visual analog scale (VAS) score were analyzed for each subject. RESULTS: Overall snoring sounds improved after surgery in 12/15 (80%) patients, and there was significant improvement in the intensity of snoring sounds after surgery (from 64.17 ± 12.18 dB to 55.62 ± 9.11 dB, p = 0.018). There was a significant difference in the F1 formant frequency before and after surgery (p = 0.031), but there were no significant differences in F2, F3, or F4. The change in F1 indicated that patients changed from mouth breathing to normal breathing. The degree of subjective snoring sounds improved significantly after surgery (VAS: from 5.40 ± 1.55 to 3.80 ± 1.26, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that snoring is reduced when nasal congestion is improved, and they demonstrate that smartphone-based acoustic analysis of snoring sounds can be useful for diagnosis.

Effect of mouth closure on upper airway obstruction in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea exhibiting mouth breathing: a drug-induced sleep endoscopy study.

PURPOSE: Snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) exhibit multifactorial aetiologies; mouth breathing increases airway obstruction and upper respiratory tract resistance. Of the many published studies, few have evaluated sleeping subjects. We explored how mouth breathing affected the upper respiratory tract anatomy and OSA during sleep. METHODS: Eighteen patients with OSA, confirmed via full-night polysomnography, were enrolled in this study. We performed drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) and defined obstruction sites before and after mouth closure using commercial mouth strips. We evaluated obstruction sites in two ways, i.e. by grading obstructions using our DISE grading system and measuring the affected areas. Patients who improved by at least one DISE grade were defined as responders. Areas were measured based on DISE videos analysed using ImageJ software. The apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) and body mass index (BMI) were recorded. RESULTS: Based on the DISE grade, 40% (7/18) of patients showed obstruction site improvement. When assessed areally, the mean number of pixels improved significantly at both the retropalatal (p = 0.045) and retrolingual (p = 0.019) levels. However, DISE non-responders exhibited no areal improvements. Responders and non-responders did not differ significantly in terms of AHI or BMI (both p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Mouth closure improves or at least does not lead to further deterioration of the upper airway. Improvements were evident at the retropalatal and especially retrolingual levels. Neither the BMI nor the AHI differed between the two groups. However, responders tended to have a higher AHI than non-responders (39.4 vs. 32.8 events/h).