Magnetic resonance imaging of posterolateral plica of the elbow joint: Asymptomatic vs. symptomatic subjects.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be useful to diagnose a posterolateral plica syndrome of the elbow joint because this syndrome has less clear clinical features. The purposes of this study were to document mediolateral and sagittal dimensions of a posterolateral synovial fold and to determine the proportion of subjects with the posterolateral plica in asymptomatic elbows. We also aimed to determine whether the dimensions of the posterolateral synovial fold and the prevalence of the plica differ between symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective review of prospectively collected data included 50 asymptomatic elbows (asymptomatic group) and 14 elbows with arthroscopically confirmed posterolateral plicae (plica group). The mediolateral and sagittal dimensions of the posterolateral synovial fold were measured. In addition, the criteria for the prevalence of posterolateral plica was determined with conventional MRI as synovial fold dimension ≥ 3 mm and coverage of radial head by synovial fold ≥ 30%. RESULTS: The plica group showed larger posterolateral synovial fold dimensions compared to the asymptomatic group. The median mediolateral and sagittal dimensions of the synovial fold in the asymptomatic group were 3.8 mm and 4.7 mm, respectively. Dimensions in the plica group were 7.0 mm and 7.4 mm, respectively. When the presence of posterolateral plica was determined using the dimension criteria, there was no difference in the prevalence of the plica between the asymptomatic and the plica group. However, using the coverage criteria, the prevalence of posterolateral elbow plica was significantly greater in the plica group than the asymptomatic group (64% vs. 18%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery for posterolateral plica syndrome had larger dimensions of the posterolateral synovial fold and higher prevalence of the posterolateral plica on conventional MRI compared to the asymptomatic subjects.

Do the radiographic findings of symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus in children differ from normal control subjects?

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to quantitatively compare radiographic findings of symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus in children with those of matched controls. METHODS: Seventy-eight consecutive children (91 knees) who underwent arthroscopic surgery for a symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus (discoid group) were included. Another 91 age- and sex-matched controls with normal medial and lateral menisci on the basis of magnetic resonance imaging findings were included in this study (control group). Each plain radiograph was evaluated from the anteroposterior view for the following variables: height of the lateral tibial spine, lateral joint space distance, height of the fibular head, squaring of the lateral femoral condyle, obliquity of the lateral tibial plateau and cupping of the lateral tibial plateau. Lateral femoral condylar notch was evaluated in lateral view. Statistical analyses were used to determine the differences between the two groups. RESULTS: A significant difference in the mean height of the lateral tibial spine, lateral joint space distance, height of the fibular head, and obliquity of the lateral tibial plateau distinguished the two groups (p < 0.0001). However, there was no statistical difference in the condylar off sign, squaring of the lateral femoral condyle, cupping of the lateral tibial plateau and lateral femoral condylar notch between groups (n.s.). The cut-off values for the height of the lateral tibial spine (6 mm), lateral joint space distance (8 mm), height of the fibular head (14.9 mm) and obliquity of the lateral tibial plateau (17.6°) were determined. With these cut-off values in diagnosing discoid lateral meniscus, the sensitivity and accuracy of height of the fibular head were 78 and 70 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Several plain radiographic findings in symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus in children were significantly different from those in normal control. These findings would be helpful in screening tool of discoid lateral meniscus for children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

The MRI findings of meniscal root tear of the medial meniscus: emphasis on coronal, sagittal and axial images.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the characteristic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of medial meniscal root tear in the coronal, sagittal and axial planes. METHODS: Thirty arthroscopically diagnosed patients who had undergone preoperative knee MRI were included in this study. They were compared to 30 age-matched patients with medial meniscus tears without root tears. The findings used for imaging analysis were as follows: the radial tear on the meniscal root of the medial meniscus in the axial plane, the presence of the truncation sign in the coronal plane and the ghost meniscus sign in the sagittal plane. Meniscal extrusion in the coronal plane was also evaluated. All the MRI findings of both groups were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: All the findings were more frequently found in the root tear group than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of finding a radial tear in the axial plane were 93.3, 100, 100 and 93.8%, respectively. In the coronal plane, rates for the presence of the truncation sign were 90, 100, 100 and 90.9%, respectively. In the sagittal plane, rates for the presence of the ghost meniscus sign were 96.7, 96.7, 96.7 and 96.7%, respectively. The rates for the meniscus extrusion in the coronal plane were 63.3, 90, 86.4 and 71.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of medial meniscal root tear were characteristic as compared with the control group. Radial tear in the axial plane also showed similar diagnostic accuracy as that seen in the other planes. The characteristic findings provide high diagnostic accuracy, and axial plane is helpful to detect medial meniscal root tear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level III.

Multivariate analysis of the predictors of survival for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization: focusing on superselective chemoembolization.

OBJECTIVE: While the prognostic factors of survival for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) are well known, the clinical significance of performing selective TACE for HCC patients has not been clearly documented. We tried to analyze the potential factors of disease-free survival for these patients, including the performance of selective TACE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 151 patients with HCC who underwent TACE were retrospectively analyzed for their disease-free survival (a median follow-up of 23 months, range: 1-88 months). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for 20 potential factors by using the Cox proportional hazard model, including 19 baseline factors and one procedure-related factor (conventional versus selective TACE). The parameters that proved to be significant on the univariate analysis were subsequently tested with the multivariate model. RESULTS: Conventional or selective TACE was performed for 40 and 111 patients, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that tumor multiplicity, venous tumor thrombosis and selective TACE were the only three independent significant prognostic factors of disease-free survival (p = 0.002, 0.015 and 0.019, respectively). CONCLUSION: In our study, selective TACE was a favorable prognostic factor for the disease-free survival of patients with HCC who underwent TACE.