The burden of knee osteoarthritis worldwide, regionally, and nationally from 1990 to 2019, along with an analysis of cross-national inequalities.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the disease burden of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) globally, regionally, and in 204 countries by age, sex, and sociodemographic index (SDI) from 1990 to 2019, and to explore cross-national inequalities across SDI. METHODS: The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 database collected data on KOA worldwide from 1990 to 2019, including prevalence, incidence, years lived with disability (YLDs). The average annual percentage change (AAPC) was used to measure temporal trends. In addition, the inequality slope index and the health concentration index were calculated to quantify the unequal distribution of the burden of KOA across 204 countries worldwide. RESULTS: In 2019, the global age-standardized prevalence rate increased by 7.5% compared with 1990, and the age-standardized incidence rate increased by about 6.2%; The age-standardized YLDs rate increased by about 7.8%. In addition to the Republic of Korea and the United States of America, the disease burden of KOA has increased year by year in other countries around the world. The incidence of KOA was highest at ages 50-59, while the prevalence and rates of YLDs were highest at ages 75-84. The burden of KOA was higher in women than in men. Cross-country inequality suggests that the inequality in the burden of KOA between high SDI and low SDI countries becomes greater, and that countries with high SDI bear a disproportionately high burden. CONCLUSION: The global KOA burden has risen steadily between 1990 and 2019, and cross-national inequality gaps remain large. Targeted measures must therefore be taken to address this inequality and the increasing global KOA disease burden.

Hinged External Fixation Combined with Open Debridement for Post-traumatic Elbow Stiffness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Open debridement remains the gold standard for the clinical treatment of post-traumatic elbow stiffness. However, postoperative complications, such as re-contraction and heterotopic ossification of the elbow joint, are highly prevalent. Hinged external fixation appears to offer the potential for greater improvement of joint function and reduction of complications. The purpose of this article is to provide the latest evidence on the effectiveness and safety of hinged external fixation combined with open debridement for the treatment of post-traumatic elbow stiffness. Methods: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases until December 31, 2022. STATA 15.1 software was used to analyze all the data for this article. The quality of the included articles was evaluated using the Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook 5.3. Results: Finally, we selected 8 high-quality RCTs for our meta-analysis, which included 555 patients. The meta-analysis demonstrated that hinged external fixation combined with open debridement for post-traumatic elbow stiffness (treatment group) showed a significant increase in elbow flexion and extension mobility (WMD = 5.16, 95% CI 4.39-5.49, Z = 13.02, P = 0.000), Mayo elbow function scores (WMD = 5.25, 95% CI 4.33-6.17, Z = 11.15, P = 0.000), and Mayo excellent rate (RR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.14-1.37, Z = 4.87, P = 0.000). Additionally, there was a significant decrease in the complication rate (RR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.20, Z = 2.54, P = 0.011) compared to open debridement alone (control group). Furthermore, the results of the publication bias test showed no significant bias. Conclusions: With the assistance of hinged external fixation, open debridement for post-traumatic elbow stiffness can lead to increased elbow mobility and a reduced complication rate. However, due to the small sample size, a multicenter randomized controlled trial with a larger sample size is still necessary to further confirm the effectiveness and safety of hinged external fixation combined with open debridement for post-traumatic elbow stiffness. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-023-01087-y.

[Application of TightRope system combined with Locking-Loop biplane anatomical reconstruction technique for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation].

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of TightRope system combined with Locking-Loop biplane anatomical reconstruction technique in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Methods: A clinical data of 28 patients with acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation who met the selection criteria and admitted between June 2018 and December 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 18 males and 10 females, with an average age of 47.7 years (range, 22-72 years). The causes of injury included falling (13 cases) and traffic accidents (15 cases). The acromioclavicular joint dislocation was rated as Rockwood type Ⅲ in 7 cases, type Ⅳ in 16 cases, and type Ⅴ in 5 cases. The time from injury to operation was 4-13 days, with an average of 9.5 days. The acromioclavicular joint dislocation was reconstructed with TightRope system and high-strength wire by Locking-Loop methods during operation. The operation time and complications were recorded. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Constant-Murley score, and active range of motion of shoulder (forward flexion and upward lift, abduction and upward lift, and external rotation) were recorded before operation and at 12 months after operation to evaluate the functional recovery of shoulder. The loss of acromioclavicular joint reduction was assessed by comparing the coracoclavicular distance (CCD) based on the anteroposterior X-ray films at 3 days and 12 months after operation. Results: The operation time was 58-100 minutes (median, 85 minutes). All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12 months. During follow-up, 2 patients developed shoulder adhesion, which recovered after rehabilitation exercise. At 12 months after operation, the VAS score was significantly lower, the Constant-Murley score was significantly higher, and the range of motion of the shoulder joint (forward flexion and upward lift, abduction and upward lift, and external rotation) significantly increased when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05). X-ray films showed that the CCD was 8.4 (7.3, 9.4) and 9.2 (8.1, 10.1) mm at 3 days and 12 months after operation, respectively, with a significant difference ( Z=-4.665, P<0.001). During follow-up, there was no complication such as infection, titanium plate entrapment, fracture, internal fixation failure, or redislocation. Conclusion: The treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with TightRope system combined with Locking-Loop biplane anatomical reconstruction has the advantages of small incision, joint reduction under direct vision, high fixation strength, and low incidence of postoperative complications, which can effectively relieve the pain of patients' shoulder joint and facilitate the recovery of shoulder joint function.