ABSTRACT
Purpose: This study aimed to explore the neurological effects of dexmedetomidine-induced sedation on memory using functional stability, a whole-brain voxel-wise dynamic functional connectivity approach. Methods: A total of 16 participants (10 men) underwent auditory memory task-related fMRI in the awake state and under dexmedetomidine sedation. Explicit and implicit memory tests were conducted 4 h after ceasing dexmedetomidine administration. One-sample Wilcoxon signed rank test was applied to determine the formation of explicit and implicit memory in the two states. Functional stability was calculated and compared voxel-wise between the awake and sedated states. The association between functional stability and memory performance was also assessed. Results: In the awake baseline tests, explicit and implicit memory scores were significantly different from zero (p < 0.05). In the tests under sedation, explicit and implicit memory scores were not significantly different from zero. Compared to that at wakeful baseline, functional stability during light sedation was reduced in the medial prefrontal cortex, left angular gyrus, and right hippocampus (all clusters, p < 0.05, GRF-corrected), whereas the left superior temporal gyrus exhibited higher functional stability (cluster p < 0.05, GRF-corrected). No significant associations were observed between functional stability and memory test scores. Conclusions: The distribution and patterns of alterations in functional stability during sedation illustrate the modulation of functional architecture by dexmedetomidine from a dynamic perspective. Our findings provide novel insight into the dynamic brain functional networks underlying consciousness and memory in humans.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Acute hemodynamic responses to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) may increase the risk of cardiovascular complications in vulnerable patients. The aim of the current study was to assess the effect of small-dose dexmedetomidine on hyperdynamic responses to ECT. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients were enrolled and randomly allocated to receive either 0.2 µg/kg dexmedetomidine (Dex group, n = 39) or saline (Control group, n = 39) prior to ECT. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded immediately after the administration of dexmedetomidine (T1), and 0, 1, 3, 5 and 10 min after the electrical stimuli ended (T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6). In addition, the peak HR after ECT, seizure duration, recovery time, and incidence rates of post-ECT adverse effects (agitation, headache and nausea) were also recorded. RESULTS: HR and MAP in the Dex group were significantly lower than those in the Control group from T2 to T5. In addition, peak HR was significantly lower in the Dex group compared with that in the Control group. Seizure length and time to spontaneous breathing, eye opening, and obeying commands in the Dex group were similar to those in the Control group. The incidence rates of post-ECT agitation and headache in the Dex group were significantly lower than that in the Control group. CONCLUSION: The administration of 0.2 µg/kg dexmedetomidine to patients receiving ECT leads to a significant reduction in HR, MAP, and peak HR responses to ECT without altering seizure duration or delaying recovery. Furthermore, dexmedetomidine effectively reduced the incidence rates of post-ECT adverse effects such as agitation and headache.
