Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Dig Dis ; 20(11): 578-588, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31429214

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether EndoCuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) could improve adenoma detection rate (ADR) compared with standard colonoscopy (SC). METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched for articles published up to March 2019. All pure randomized controlled trials comparing ADR between EAC and SC groups were included. Dichotomous data were pooled to obtain the odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval (CI), whereas continuous data were pooled using a mean difference with 95% CI. Review Manager Version 5.3 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Thirteen randomized controlled trials consisting of 9038 patients (EAC: 4574; SC: 4464) were included. The EAC group showed significant superiority over the SC group in ADR (odds ratio 1.37, 95% CI 1.15-1.62). However, there were no differences between the EAC and SC groups in adverse events, cecal intubation rate, and cecal intubation time. CONCLUSIONS: EAC could significantly improve ADR without increasing adverse events, especially for operators with low ADRs. In addition, no significant difference was observed in cecal intubation time and cecal intubation rate between EAC and SC.


Subject(s)
Adenoma/diagnosis , Colonoscopy/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colonoscopy/adverse effects , Humans , Intubation, Gastrointestinal , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...