Safety and Immunogenicity of Homologous Recombinant Adenovirus Type 5-Vectored COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Dose in Healthy Adults Aged 18-60 Years: a Single-Center, Open-Label Trial.

INTRODUCTION: The waning antibody levels several months after prime vaccination and the persistent epidemics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) around the world have generated great interest in the evaluation of a booster dose. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of a homologous booster dose of the recombinant adenovirus type 5-vectored coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine (Ad5-nCoV). METHODS: In this trial, we recruited healthy adults aged 18-60 years who had received one dose of Ad5-nCoV vaccine (low, middle, or high dose) in the previous phase 1 trial approximately 6 months earlier, and then all participants received a booster dose of 5 × 1010 viral particles (low dose) intramuscularly. The primary outcome was the incidence of adverse reactions within 14 days after booster vaccination. The specific binding antibodies were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the neutralizing antibody responses were assessed with live SARS-CoV-2 and pseudovirus neutralization assay. The cellular immune responses were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunospot assay and intracellular cytokine staining. RESULTS: From September 26 to 28, 2020, 108 volunteers were recruited and 89 eligible participants (52% male) were enrolled and received a booster dose of Ad5-nCoV vaccine: 28 (31%) had received a low prime dose, 30 (34%) a middle prime dose, and 31 (35%) a high prime dose in the previous phase 1 trial. All participants were included in the safety analysis and immunogenicity was assessed in 88 (99%) participants. Twenty-three (82%) participants in the low prime dose group, 23 (77%) participants in the middle prime dose group, and 26 (84%) participants in the high prime dose group reported at least one adverse reaction within the first 14 days post booster. Pain at the injection site and fatigue were the most common adverse reactions. Most adverse reactions were mild or moderate in all groups and no vaccine-related severe adverse event was noted within 12 months after booster vaccination. Neutralizing antibodies increased moderately at day 14 and peaked at 28 days post booster. T cell responses were also boosted at 14 days after vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: A homologous booster of Ad5-nCoV vaccine is well tolerated and immunogenic in healthy adults aged 18-60 years who had received a priming dose of Ad5-nCoV 6 months previously. The neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 peaked at day 28 and specific T cell responses were noted at day 14 after booster. Ad5-nCoV vaccine can be considered as a homologous booster 6 months after a priming dose. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04568811.

The 6-Month Antibody Durability of Heterologous Convidecia Plus CoronaVac and Homologous CoronaVac Immunizations in People Aged 18-59 Years and over 60 Years Based on Two Randomized Controlled Trials in China.

Previous reports have shown that heterologous boosting with the AD5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine Convidecia based on a primary series of two doses of inactivated vaccine induces increasing immune responses. However, the immune persistence until 6 months after the heterologous prime-boost immunization was limited. Participants were from two single-center, randomized, controlled, observer-blinded trials, which involved individuals of 18-59 years of age and over 60 years of age. Eligible participants who previously primed with one dose or two doses of CoronaVac were stratified and randomly assigned to inoculate a booster dose of Convidecia or CoronaVac. Neutralizing antibodies against a live SARS-CoV-2 prototype virus and Delta and Omicron (B.1.1.529) variants, pseudovirus neutralizing antibodies against Omicron BA.4/5 variants, and anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies at month 6 were detected, and the fold decreases and rate difference were calculated by comparing the levels of antibodies at month 6 with the peak levels at month 1. The neutralizing antibody titers against prototype SARS-CoV-2, RBD-specific IgG antibodies, and the Delta variant in the heterologous regimen of the CoronaVac plus Convidecia groups were significantly higher than those of the homologous prime-boost groups. In three-dose regimen groups, the geometric mean titers (GMTs) of neutralizing antibodies against prototype SARS-CoV-2 were 30.6 (95% CI: 25.1; 37.2) in the heterologous boosting group versus 6.9 (95% CI: 5.6; 8.6) in the homologous boosting group (p < 0.001) at month 6 in participants aged 18-59 years, and in the two-dose regimen, the neutralizing antibody GMTs were 8.5 (95% CI: 6.2; 11.7) and 2.7 (2.3 to 3.1) (heterologous regimen group versus CoronaVac regimen group, p < 0.001). Participants aged over 60 years had similar levels of neutralizing antibodies against the prototype, with GMTs of 49.1 (38.0 to 63.6) in the group receiving two doses of CoronaVac plus one dose of Convidecia versus 9.4 (7.7 to 11.4) in the group receiving three doses of CoronaVac (p < 0.001) and 11.6 (8.4 to 16.0) in the group receiving one dose of CoronaVac and one dose of Convidecia versus 3.3 (2.7 to 4.0) in the group receiving two doses of CoronaVac (p < 0.001). Compared with day 14, over sixfold decreases in neutralizing antibody GMTs were observed in the heterologous groups of the three- or two-dose regimen groups of younger and elderly participants, while in the homologous regimen groups, the GMTs of neutralizing antibodies decreased about fivefold in the two age groups. The heterologous prime-boost regimen with two doses of CoronaVac and one dose of Convidecia was persistently more immunogenic than the regimen of the homologous prime-boost with three doses of CoronaVac.

A comparison of the test-negative and the matched case-control study designs for estimation of EV71 vaccine immunological surrogate endpoints from a randomized controlled trial.

Since TND could be an appropriate method to assess vaccine effectiveness, we want to know whether it may be used for the estimation of vaccine immunological surrogate endpoints, like case-control study. We conducted two study designs (test-negative design (TND) VS matched case-control design (MCC)) to evaluate immunological surrogate endpoint against EV71-associated diseases. We calculated sensitivity (proportion of participants with EV71-associated disease who have a titer less than the cutoff at day 56), specificity (proportion of matched controls who have a titer equal or greater than the cutoff at day 56), and corresponding Youden index ([sensitivity + specificity] - 1). Then, we compared them between TND and MCC. In test-negative design, we totally enrolled 7029 subjects, 49 tested positive as cases and 6980 tested negative as controls in per-protocol population. In matched case-control design, we totally enrolled 305 subjects, 51 as cases, and 254 as controls in whole cohort. In sensitivity and specificity comparison, TND and MCC's results were similar to each other, except for a titer of 1:4. Nonetheless, in Youden index comparison, MCC's results were slightly higher than the TND's, except for a titer of 1:4. EV71 vaccine immunological surrogate endpoints derived from TND was similar to MCC's. Our results supported that TND could become an alternative research design with the progress of surveillance.

Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines: landscape of global studies and potential risks.

ABSTRACT: With the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the importance of vaccines in epidemic prevention and public health has become even more obvious than ever. However, the emergence of multiple severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants worldwide has raised concerns about the effectiveness of current COVID-19 vaccines. Here, we review the characteristics of COVID-19 vaccine candidates in five platforms and the latest clinical trial results of them. In addition, we further discuss future directions for the research and development of the next generation of COVID-19 vaccines. We also summarize the serious adverse events reported recently after the large-scale vaccination with the current COVID-19 vaccines, including the thromboembolism caused by the AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson vaccines.

The COVID-19 Vaccine in Clinical Trials: Where Are We Now?

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to scale up around the world, costing severe health and economic losses. The development of an effective COVID-19 vaccine is of utmost importance. Most vaccine designs can be classified into three camps: protein based (inactivated vaccines, protein subunit, VLP and T-cell based vaccines), gene based (DNA or RNA vaccines, replicating or non-replicating viral/bacterial vectored vaccines), and a combination of both protein-based and gene-based (live-attenuated virus vaccines). Up to now, 237 candidate vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are in development worldwide, of which 63 have been approved for clinical trials and 27 are evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials. Six candidate vaccines have been authorized for emergency use or conditional licensed, based on their efficacy data in phase 3 trials. This review summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of the candidate COVID-19 vaccines from various platforms, compares, and discusses their protective efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity according to the published clinical trials results.

Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18 years or older: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: This is the first randomised controlled trial for assessment of the immunogenicity and safety of a candidate non-replicating adenovirus type-5 (Ad5)-vectored COVID-19 vaccine, aiming to determine an appropriate dose of the candidate vaccine for an efficacy study. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial of the Ad5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine was done in a single centre in Wuhan, China. Healthy adults aged 18 years or older, who were HIV-negative and previous severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection-free, were eligible to participate and were randomly assigned to receive the vaccine at a dose of 1 × 1011 viral particles per mL or 5 × 1010 viral particles per mL, or placebo. Investigators allocated participants at a ratio of 2:1:1 to receive a single injection intramuscularly in the arm. The randomisation list (block size 4) was generated by an independent statistician. Participants, investigators, and staff undertaking laboratory analyses were masked to group allocation. The primary endpoints for immunogenicity were the geometric mean titres (GMTs) of specific ELISA antibody responses to the receptor binding domain (RBD) and neutralising antibody responses at day 28. The primary endpoint for safety evaluation was the incidence of adverse reactions within 14 days. All recruited participants who received at least one dose were included in the primary and safety analyses. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04341389. FINDINGS: 603 volunteers were recruited and screened for eligibility between April 11 and 16, 2020. 508 eligible participants (50% male; mean age 39·7 years, SD 12·5) consented to participate in the trial and were randomly assigned to receive the vaccine (1 × 1011 viral particles n=253; 5 × 1010 viral particles n=129) or placebo (n=126). In the 1 × 1011 and 5 × 1010 viral particles dose groups, the RBD-specific ELISA antibodies peaked at 656·5 (95% CI 575·2-749·2) and 571·0 (467·6-697·3), with seroconversion rates at 96% (95% CI 93-98) and 97% (92-99), respectively, at day 28. Both doses of the vaccine induced significant neutralising antibody responses to live SARS-CoV-2, with GMTs of 19·5 (95% CI 16·8-22·7) and 18·3 (14·4-23·3) in participants receiving 1 × 1011 and 5 × 1010 viral particles, respectively. Specific interferon γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay responses post vaccination were observed in 227 (90%, 95% CI 85-93) of 253 and 113 (88%, 81-92) of 129 participants in the 1 × 1011 and 5 × 1010 viral particles dose groups, respectively. Solicited adverse reactions were reported by 183 (72%) of 253 and 96 (74%) of 129 participants in the 1 × 1011 and 5 × 1010 viral particles dose groups, respectively. Severe adverse reactions were reported by 24 (9%) participants in the 1 × 1011 viral particles dose group and one (1%) participant in the 5 × 1010 viral particles dose group. No serious adverse reactions were documented. INTERPRETATION: The Ad5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine at 5 × 1010 viral particles is safe, and induced significant immune responses in the majority of recipients after a single immunisation. FUNDING: National Key R&D Programme of China, National Science and Technology Major Project, and CanSino Biologics.

Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine: a dose-escalation, open-label, non-randomised, first-in-human trial.

BACKGROUND: A vaccine to protect against COVID-19 is urgently needed. We aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 (Ad5) vectored COVID-19 vaccine expressing the spike glycoprotein of a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) strain. METHODS: We did a dose-escalation, single-centre, open-label, non-randomised, phase 1 trial of an Ad5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine in Wuhan, China. Healthy adults aged between 18 and 60 years were sequentially enrolled and allocated to one of three dose groups (5 × 1010, 1 × 1011, and 1·5 × 1011 viral particles) to receive an intramuscular injection of vaccine. The primary outcome was adverse events in the 7 days post-vaccination. Safety was assessed over 28 days post-vaccination. Specific antibodies were measured with ELISA, and the neutralising antibody responses induced by vaccination were detected with SARS-CoV-2 virus neutralisation and pseudovirus neutralisation tests. T-cell responses were assessed by enzyme-linked immunospot and flow-cytometry assays. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04313127. FINDINGS: Between March 16 and March 27, 2020, we screened 195 individuals for eligibility. Of them, 108 participants (51% male, 49% female; mean age 36·3 years) were recruited and received the low dose (n=36), middle dose (n=36), or high dose (n=36) of the vaccine. All enrolled participants were included in the analysis. At least one adverse reaction within the first 7 days after the vaccination was reported in 30 (83%) participants in the low dose group, 30 (83%) participants in the middle dose group, and 27 (75%) participants in the high dose group. The most common injection site adverse reaction was pain, which was reported in 58 (54%) vaccine recipients, and the most commonly reported systematic adverse reactions were fever (50 [46%]), fatigue (47 [44%]), headache (42 [39%]), and muscle pain (18 [17%]. Most adverse reactions that were reported in all dose groups were mild or moderate in severity. No serious adverse event was noted within 28 days post-vaccination. ELISA antibodies and neutralising antibodies increased significantly at day 14, and peaked 28 days post-vaccination. Specific T-cell response peaked at day 14 post-vaccination. INTERPRETATION: The Ad5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine is tolerable and immunogenic at 28 days post-vaccination. Humoral responses against SARS-CoV-2 peaked at day 28 post-vaccination in healthy adults, and rapid specific T-cell responses were noted from day 14 post-vaccination. Our findings suggest that the Ad5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine warrants further investigation. FUNDING: National Key R&D Program of China, National Science and Technology Major Project, and CanSino Biologics.