ABSTRACT
Introduction: Given the importance of parent involvement to students' academic achievement, researchers have used a variety of methods to investigate the relationship between the two, but few focus on the relationship between parental homework involvement and students' achievement in a specific subject by using meta-analysis. This meta-analysis investigated the relationship between parent homework involvement and students' mathematics achievement from two dimensions: supportive (SPI) and intrusive parent homework involvement (IPI), along with their moderators. Methods: Accessed through Web of Science, Taylor and Francis Online, EBSCO, Springer Link, Elsevier, and ProQuest databases, a total of 20 empirical studies between 2005 to 2022, 41 independent effect sizes were included (N = 16,338). Effect size estimations were obtained by transforming Fisher's correlation coefficient. This study has conducted the heterogeneity tests of the magnitudes grouped according to different moderators, and investigated the publication bias that affects meta-analysis studies. Results and discussion: The results showed an overall positive link between SPI and students' mathematics achievement (r = 0.076, 95% CI = [0.037, 0.114]) and a negative link between IPI and students' mathematics achievement (r = -0.153, 95% CI = [-0.226, -0.079]). For the link of SPI and students' mathematics achievement, the effect sizes were (a) strongest when SPI was measured by autonomy support, followed by content support and provision of structure respectively; (b) stronger when students' mathematics achievement indicated by non-standardized measurement than standardized measurement. For the link of IPI and students' mathematics achievement, the effect sizes varied across grade level, strongest in high school, followed by middle school and lowest in primary school. These findings provide important implications for how to improve parental homework involvement practice to increase students' mathematics achievement.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the nursing of postoperative lung cancer patients treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). METHODS: A total of 64 lung cancer patients in our hospital were recruited as the study cohort and randomly divided into a CPAP group and a control group. The patients in the CPAP group (n=30) were administered CPAP, while those in the control group (n=34) were given routine low flow oxygen inhalation, a respiratory stimulant, a bronchodilator, antibiotics, antitussives, anti-inflammatories (glucocorticoids), an apophlegmatisant (ambroxol), basic nutritional support, correcting acidosis, etc. Results: The patients in the CPAP group showed a more significant improvement in their blood gas analysis, and they also had better airway patency and secretion cleaning effects compared with those in the control group. One month after the treatment, the patients in the CPAP group had significantly less inappetence, weight loss, electrolyte disturbance, dyspnea, and pulmonary encephalopathy than the patients in the control group. One week after the treatment, the patients in the CPAP group had higher maximum ventilatory volumes (MVV), higher maximum mid-expiratory flows (MMF), higher forced expiratory volumes in 1s/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), higher peak expiratory flows (PEF), and higher total lung capacity (TLC) than the patients in the control group. CONCLUSION: CPAP can significantly improve postoperative dyspnea in lung cancer patients.
