Development and Interrater Agreement of a Novel Classification System Combining Medical and Surgical Adverse Event Reporting.

Importance: Categorization systems for adverse events are not standardized across care settings and specialties and do not always include near miss events (events where there was potential for patient harm, but where no actual harm occurred), making it difficult to effectively assess patient safety for quality improvement. Objective: To develop and assess interrater agreement on a classification system for adverse events reporting that incorporates events in both inpatient and outpatient settings across medical and surgical subspecialties including near miss events. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study in a tertiary care center including 174 patient cases occurring from 2018 to 2020 was carried out. Data were abstracted from a Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Quality Assurance database. The cases were comprised of near miss and adverse events occurring in adult and pediatric patients in inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department settings. The ratings took place in March and April of 2022. Exposures: Four raters (2 attending physicians and 2 senior resident physicians) were recruited to classify these cases according to 3 classification systems: the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC-MERP), Clavien-Dindo, and our novel Quality Improvement Classification System (QICS). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was overall interrater agreements using Fleiss κ. Results: Across all 4 raters grading 174 cases, the NCC-MERP, Clavien-Dindo, and QICS received a κ score. Fair-to-moderate interrater reliability was observed between the resident and attending physician groups across the 3 classification systems: NCC-MERP (κ = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.30-0.35), Clavien-Dindo (κ = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.43-0.50), and QICS (κ = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.39-0.44). Strong interrater concordance was observed for complications across all scenarios. Conclusion and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that the new QICS classification scheme was applicable to wide-ranging clinical scenarios with a focus on patient-centered outcomes including near miss events. In addition, QICS allowed for the comparison of patient outcome data in a multitude of settings.

The Face of COVID-19: Facial Pressure Wounds Related to Prone Positioning in Patients Undergoing Ventilation in the Intensive Care Unit.

In the setting of COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019)-associated moderate and severe acute respiratory distress, persistently hypoxemic patients often require prone positioning for >16 hours. We report facial pressure wounds and ear necrosis as a consequence of prone positioning in patients undergoing ventilation in the intensive care unit in a tertiary medical center in New York City.