ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the colonic motility of slow transit constipation (STC) patients using high-resolution colonic manometry (HRCM) and classify the patients' subtypes to instruct treatment based on HRCM characteristics. METHODS: This study enrolled one hundred and twenty-six STC patients and 35 volunteers (healthy controls, HCs). Ambulatory HRCM was performed in all participants by placing a 36-sensor water-perfused probe up to the cecum. Quantitative and qualitative manometric analysis was conducted in the state of rest, postprandial, during sleep, and wakefulness. RESULTS: The occurrence rate and times of high amplitude propagated contraction (HAPC) in STC patients were lower than HCs. As for the HAPC contraction characteristics, the mean velocity was similar, contraction length, amplitude, area under the curve (AUC) of pressure wave, and duration were reduced in STC patients compared with HCs. In addition, the occurrence rate and times of low amplitude propagated contraction (LAPC) in STC patients were similar compared to HCs. There was no difference in HAPC occurrence, LAPC occurrence, and most detailed HAPC characteristics between STC patients ≤60 years and STC patients >60 years or between male STC patients and female STC patients. Based on the HRCM characteristics (including HAPC, neostigmine induced HAPC, LAPC, and waking/gastrocolic response), STC patients were classified into four types, respectively, with recommended treatment by clinical experience. CONCLUSION: HRCM serves as a valuable tool in characterizing, classifying the pathophysiology, and guiding clinical management for STC.
Subject(s)
Colon , Constipation , Humans , Male , Female , Manometry , NeostigmineABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study was to observe the diagnostic efficacy of high resolution total colonic intracavitary manometry (HRCM) vs colonic transit test (CTT) in the assessment of functional constipation (FC) in Chinese patients. METHODS: Seventy-nine cases of patients with severe FC who were admitted and received colon resection between July 2016 and July 2019 at the Tianjin Union Medical Center were retrospectively reviewed. Before operation, all patients received CTT at outpatient service, followed by HRCM at ward. The resected tissues were subject to histological observation, which was used to determine the diagnostic efficacy of HRCM vs CTT. RESULTS: The accuracy of CTT for the FC diagnosis was 69.6% (55/79), and the false negative ratio was 30.4%. The accuracy of HRCM for the FC diagnosis was 81.0% (64/79), and the false negative ratio was 19.0% (15/79). Twelve patients showed normal characteristics after CTT but abnormal after HRCM. In contrast, only 4 showed normal after HRCM but abnormal after CTT. In addition, among the 79 patients 12 were detected normal by both CTT and HRCM. CONCLUSION: HRCM can be more suitable to assess FC compared with CTT, while CTT is still indispensable for HRCM to diagnose FC.
