ABSTRACT
It remains controversial whether radical radiotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) still requires elective nodal irradiation (ENI), or only involved-field irradiation (IFI). In this study, a meta-analysis was conducted to compare ENI and IFI in the treatment of ESCC, in order to provide guidance for clinical practice. Literature on the use of ENI and IFI in the treatment of ESCC was retrieved, and the last access date was 31 December 2017. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the relative advantages and disadvantages of using ENI and IFI. Ten studies, involving a total of 1348 patients, were included in this analysis; of these, 605 patients underwent radiotherapy only, and 743 underwent radiochemotherapy. There was no significant difference in the 1-, 2- or 3-year local control rates between ENI and IFI, or in the 1-, 2- or 3-year overall survival rates. However, the incidences of ≥Grade 3 acute esophagitis and pneumonia were significantly lower in the IFI group. There were no differences in the rates of ≥Grade 3 myelosuppression or of out-field recurrence or metastasis between these two groups. Thus, neither local control rates nor overall survival rates differed significantly between the ENI and IFI groups, but in the latter group, incidences of severe radiation esophagitis and pneumonia were significantly lower. IFI was not associated with an increase in out-field recurrence or metastasis.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Esophagus/radiation effects , Cell Line, Tumor , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Radiation Injuries , Radiotherapy/methods , Radiotherapy, Conformal , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Over-expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been identified as a common feature associated with clinical outcome in many types of cancer, including squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus (SCCO). However, the clinical importance of EGFR over-expression in SCCO remains unsettled as conflicting results exist. Therefore we carried out the present meta-analysis of published studies for clarification. A total of 13 studies including 1,150 patients were enrolled. EGFR over-expression was positive in 722 of these cases. With EGFR over-expression, patients had higher depth of invasion, vascular invasion, and poor prognosis. However, expression had no relation with degree of differentiation, histological grade, lymph node metastasis, clinical stage or lymphatic invasion. EGFR over-expression is probably a valuable predictor for the T stage, vascular invasion and OS, and it could be used as a poor prognosis indicator for the esophageal SCC patients. Targeting therapy to EFGR should be considered to the combined treatment in SCCO.
