Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Euro Surveill ; 24(11)2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30892178

ABSTRACT

BackgroundGiven that measles is eliminated in Canada and measles immunisation coverage in Ontario is high, it has been questioned whether Ontario's measles outbreak response is worthwhile.AimOur objective was to determine cost-effectiveness of measles containment protocols in Ontario from the healthcare payer perspective.MethodsWe developed a decision-analysis model comparing Ontario's measles containment strategy (based on actual 2015 outbreak data) with a hypothetical 'modified response'. The modified scenario assumed 10% response costs with reduced case and contact tracing and no outbreak-associated vaccinations; it was based on local and provincial administrative and laboratory data and parameters from peer-reviewed literature. Short- and long-term health outcomes, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs discounted at 1.5%, were estimated. We conducted one- and two-way sensitivity analyses.ResultsThe 2015 outbreak in Ontario comprised 16 measles cases and an estimated 3,369 contacts. Predictive modelling suggested that the outbreak response prevented 16 outbreak-associated cases at a cost of CAD 1,213,491 (EUR 861,579). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was CAD 739,063 (EUR 524,735) per QALY gained for the outbreak response vs modified response. To meet the commonly accepted cost-effectiveness threshold of CAD 50,000 (EUR 35,500) per QALY gained, the outbreak response would have to prevent 94 measles cases. In sensitivity analyses, the findings were robust.ConclusionsOntario's measles outbreak response exceeds generally accepted cost-effectiveness thresholds and may not be the most efficient use of public health resources from a healthcare payer perspective. These findings should be balanced against benefits of increased vaccine coverage and maintaining elimination status.


Subject(s)
Contact Tracing/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Disease Outbreaks/economics , Health Care Costs , Measles/economics , Adolescent , Canada/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Contact Tracing/economics , Health Expenditures , Humans , Measles/epidemiology , Measles/prevention & control , Ontario/epidemiology , Public Health , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Vaccination/economics , Young Adult
2.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 23(7): 1063-1069, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28628461

ABSTRACT

The province of Ontario continues to experience measles virus transmissions despite the elimination of measles in Canada. We describe an unusual outbreak of measles in Ontario, Canada, in early 2015 that involved cases with a unique strain of virus and no known association among primary case-patients. A total of 18 cases of measles were reported from 4 public health units during the outbreak period (January 25-March 23, 2015); none of these cases occurred in persons who had recently traveled. Despite enhancements to case-patient interview methods and epidemiologic analyses, a source patient was not identified. However, the molecular epidemiologic analysis, which included extended sequencing, strongly suggested that all cases derived from a single importation of measles virus genotype D4. The use of timely genotype sequencing, rigorous epidemiologic investigation, and a better understanding of the gaps in surveillance are needed to maintain Ontario's measles elimination status.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Genotype , Measles virus/genetics , Measles/epidemiology , Measles/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , History, 21st Century , Humans , Male , Measles/diagnosis , Measles/history , Measles virus/classification , Ontario/epidemiology , Public Health Surveillance , RNA, Viral/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Serogroup , Vaccination , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...