Risk indicators of pre-eclampsia in north Jordan: is dental caries involved?

BACKGROUND: Despite a huge body of published research, understanding the basic pathology that leads to pre-eclampsia is still incomplete. This study was conducted among women in north Jordan to determine factors associated with pre-eclampsia and to determine if dental caries was involved. METHODS: A case-control study was carried out among women who delivered at Princess Badea Teaching Hospital, Irbid, North Jordan, between September 1, 2004 and January 1, 2005. 115 women with pre-eclampsia and 230 normotensive controls were included in the study. Information regarding participants' demographics, antenatal history and family history were collected through personal interviews. Several oral parameters were measured for each participant. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, factors found to be associated with increased odds of pre-eclampsia were age > or =35 years (adjusted OR 2.20; 95% CI 1.08, 4.48), nulliparity (adjusted OR 2.73; 95% CI 1.38, 5.39), emotional stress during pregnancy (adjusted OR 4.22; 95% CI 1.79, 9.90), maternal history of pre-eclampsia (adjusted OR 16.04; 95% CI 5.82, 44.22), family history of cardiovascular diseases (adjusted OR 2.82; 95% CI 1.22, 6.51), family history of pre-eclampsia (adjusted OR 23.26; 95% CI 5.07, 106.78), twin births (adjusted OR 37.79; 95% CI 4.22, 338.51), and Body Mass Index (BMI). In comparison with women with pre-pregnancy BMI <25, adjusted OR were 1.97, 95% CI 1.02, 3.81 for women with BMI from 25 to 29.9, and 3.31, 95% CI 1.36, 8.03 for women with BMI > or =30. Mean decayed teeth surface was found to be associated with increased odds of pre-eclampsia (adjusted OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03, 1.27). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated no difference to reported risk indicators of pre-eclampsia in other populations, but adds that dental caries may have an association with increased odds of pre-eclampsia.

Lack of association between periodontal parameters and preeclampsia.

BACKGROUND: It was hypothesized that periodontal diseases may increase the risk of preeclampsia. To test this hypothesis, this study was conducted to determine the association between periodontal parameters and preeclampsia among women in the north of Jordan. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted among women who gave birth at Princes Badea Teaching Hospital between September 2004 and May 2005. A total of 115 preeclamptic women and 230 randomly selected controls were analyzed. The number of teeth, restorations, decayed tooth surfaces, and clinical periodontal parameters were determined within 24 hours after delivery. Information regarding participants' demographics, antenatal history, and family history were collected through personal interviews. RESULTS: After adjustment for potential confounding factors, there were no statistical differences between preeclamptic cases and normotensive controls with regard to mean periodontal probing depth, mean clinical attachment loss, mean gingival recession, mean plaque index, and mean gingival index. In addition, there were no significant differences in the percentages of sites with periodontal probing depth >/=3 or >/=4 mm, percentages of sites with clinical attachment loss >/=3 mm, number of filled surfaces, and number of missing teeth. Only the number of decayed surfaces was found to be associated with increased odds of preeclampsia (adjusted odds ratio of 1.13; 95% confidence interval of 1.02 and 1.25). CONCLUSION: This study did not support the hypothesis of an association between periodontal parameters and preeclampsia.