Elimination of Doripenem during Dialysis and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Posthemodialysis Dosing for Patients Undergoing Intermittent Renal Replacement Therapy.

Doripenem is a broad-spectrum parenteral carbapenem with enhanced activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae Current dosing regimens recommend the administration of 0.25 to 0.5 g once daily in patients undergoing intermittent renal replacement therapy. As patients are usually dialyzed thrice weekly, we aimed to investigate a 1-g posthemodialysis regimen, thus reducing treatment costs and enhancing patient compliance. A second objective of this trial was to describe the pharmacokinetics of intradialytic doripenem. Ten oliguric or anuric patients in need of intermittent renal replacement therapy were included in this trial. All patients suffered from a septic episode. The mean hemofilter clearance was 123.46 ± 42.03 ml/min, and the total body clearance between hemodialysis sessions was 16.79 ± 6.02 ml/min. The average prehemodialysis trough concentration was 2.4 ± 1.3 mg/liter, while the EUCAST resistance breakpoint for Enterobacteriaceae is set at 2 mg/liter. The interpatient variability was considerably higher than the intrapatient variability. Apart from one patient who suffered an allergic reaction, doripenem was tolerated well by all patients. Our data indicate that posthemodialysis administration of 1 g of doripenem results in sufficient plasma levels in anuric but not oliguric patients during the entire dosing interval. (This trial was registered with EudraCT under registration no. 2009-018010-18 and at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02018939.).

Doripenem Treatment during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

Doripenem is a broad-spectrum parenteral carbapenem with enhanced activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. While the initial dosing recommendation for renally competent patients and patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (cRRT) was 500 mg every 8 h (q8h), the dose for renally competent patients was updated to 1 g q8h in June 2012. There are no updated data for the dosing of patients on continuous renal replacement therapy. The original dosing regimen for cRRT patients was based on nonseptic patients, while newer publications chose comparatively low target concentrations for a carbapenem. Thus, there is an urgent need for updated recommendations for dosing during cRRT. In the trial presented here, we included 13 oliguric septic patients undergoing cRRT in an intensive care setting. Five patients each were treated with hemodiafiltration or hemodialysis, while three patients received hemofiltration treatment. All patients received 1 g doripenem every 8 h. Doripenem concentrations in the plasma and ultrafiltrate were measured over 48 h. The mean hemofilter clearance was 36.53 ml/min, and the mean volume of distribution was 59.26 liters. The steady-state trough levels were found at 8.5 mg/liter, with no considerable accumulation. Based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations, we propose a regimen of 1 g q8h, which may be combined with a loading dose of 1.5 to 2 g for critically ill patients. (This study has been registered with EudraCT under registration no. 2009-018010-18 and at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02018939.).

Monitoring of unfractionated heparin with rotational thrombelastometry using the prothrombinase-induced clotting time reagent (PiCT®).

PURPOSE: To achieve sufficient and safe anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) a close and reliable drug monitoring is necessary. In general, the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) is used for this purpose. In acute phase response, however, the APTT test procedure might be unreliable e.g. with false low results in the presence of elevated factor VIII. In this so called heparin resistance, measurement of anti-Xa activity is recommended over APTT to avoid potentially harmful dose escalation. A combination of anti-Xa measurement and global hemostatic testing with ROTEM® employing the anti-Xa sensitive PiCT® reagent showed high correlation with enoxaparin levels. This test modification could also be suitable for monitoring UFH. Aim of the study was to evaluate the correlation between PiCT®-ROTEM® and levels of UFH. METHODS: In this in-vitro study blood samples from healthy volunteers were spiked with UFH and subjected to different ROTEM® tests. RESULTS: There was a linear correlation between UFH level and clotting time (CT) in the PiCT®-ROTEM® test with an excellent correlation coefficient of 0.92. Additional endpoints showed similar results (PiCT®-ROTEM® MaxVel r = -0.85 and PiCT®-ROTEM® t_MaxVel r = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: As a point-of-care applicable tool ROTEM® is immediately at hand. If further clinical studies confirm sensitivity in heparin resistance, PiCT®-ROTEM® could permit rapid UFH dose adjustments especially required in critical illness with acute phase response.