Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 86
Filter
1.
Rev Esp Quimioter ; 36(1): 1-25, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36322133

ABSTRACT

We do not know the precise figure for solid organ tumors diagnosed each year in Spain and it is therefore difficult to calculate whether there has been a decrease in cancer diagnoses as a consequence of the pandemic. Some indirect data suggest that the pandemic has worsened the stage at which some non-hematological neoplasms are diagnosed. Despite the lack of robust evidence, oncology patients seem more likely to have a poor outcome when they contract COVID-19. The antibody response to infection in cancer patients will be fundamentally conditioned by the type of neoplasia present, the treatment received and the time of its administration. In patients with hematological malignancies, the incidence of infection is probably similar or lower than in the general population, due to the better protective measures adopted by the patients and their environment. The severity and mortality of COVID-19 in patients with hematologic malignancies is clearly higher than the general population. Since the immune response to vaccination in hematologic patients is generally worse than in comparable populations, alternative methods of prevention must be established in these patients, as well as actions for earlier diagnosis and treatment. Campaigns for the early diagnosis of malignant neoplasms must be urgently resumed, post-COVID manifestations should be monitored, collaboration with patient associations is indisputable and it is urgent to draw the right conclusions to improve our preparedness to fight against possible future catastrophes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , COVID-19/diagnosis , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Spain/epidemiology , Vaccination , COVID-19 Testing
4.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 59(6): 102921, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32928663

ABSTRACT

The Hematology Department and its Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) program implemented several measures during COVID-19 outbreak in order to keep clinical activities with the maximum security for both donors and recipients. Nevertheless, there was a lack of evidence whether blood products and specifically bone marrow can cause transfusion-transmitted infection. Initially, there were many uncertainties and did not exist formal recommendations. Before official statements were available, we performed an allogeneic HCT in a 57-year-old male from a related matched donor in the incubation period of COVID-19 where the patient did not develop the disease. Actual epidemiology data suggest that transmission may occur early in the course of infection, even from asymptomatic patients in the incubation period. In our knowledge this is the first case report of an adult hematopoietic cell donor with COVID-19 in the incubation period where the transplant is successfully completed with no transmission of SARS-CoV-2. The low concentration of viral RNA in plasma of patients with COVID-19 could support the safety of blood products, including peripheral blood hematopoietic cells. In conclusion, blood products including hematopoietic stem cells are safe in the context of COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/blood , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell , SARS-CoV-2 , Tissue Donors , Allografts , Female , Humans , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell/blood , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell/therapy , Male , Middle Aged
5.
Hematology ; 24(1): 39-48, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30073913

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify ways that provision of hemophilia care can be maximized at the local level, irrespective of available resources or cultural or geographic challenges. METHODS: The SHIELD group used its multinational experience to share examples of local initiatives that have been employed to deliver optimal hemophilia care. RESULTS: The examples were reviewed and categorized into four key themes: guidelines and algorithms for delivery of care; collaboration with patients and allied groups for care and education; registries for the monitoring of treatment and outcomes and health care planning and delivery; and opportunities for personalization of care. These themes were then incorporated into a road map for collaborative care in hemophilia that reflected the contribution of best practice. DISCUSSION: Differing healthcare reimbursement systems, budgetary constraints, and geographical and cultural factors make it difficult for any country to fully deliver ideal care for people with hemophilia. The SHIELD approach for collaborative care provides illustrative examples of how four key themes can be used to optimize hemophilia care in any setting. ABBREVIATIONS: AHCDC: Association of Hemophilia Clinic Directors of Canada; AICE: Italian Association of Hemophilia Centres; ATHN: American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network; EAHAD: European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders; EHC: European Hemophilia Consortium; FIX: Coagulation Factor IX; FVIII: Coagulation Factor VIII; HAL: Haemophilia Activity List; HJHS: Haemophilia Joint Health Score; HTC: Hemophilia Treatment Centre; HTCCNC: Hemophilia Treatment Centre Collaborative Network of China; MASAC: Medical and Scientific Advisory Council; MDT: Multidisciplinary team; NHD: National Haemophilia Database; NHF: National Hemophilia Foundation; PK: Pharmacokinetics; POCUS: Point of care ultrasound; PWH: People with haemophilia; SHIELD: Supporting Hemophilia through International Education, Learning and Development; WFH: World Federation of Hemophilia.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , Hemophilia A/therapy , Precision Medicine , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Precision Medicine/methods , Precision Medicine/standards
6.
Eur J Pharm Sci ; 128: 215-221, 2019 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30529268

ABSTRACT

Trough factor (F) VIII level is a not reliable bleeding risk indicator to predict prophylaxis efficacy in severe haemophilia A (SHA), therefore, accurate biomarkers are much needed. Thrombelastography (TEG) monitors both thrombin and clot formation addressing the global haemostatic status but its usefulness to tailor prophylaxis in haemophilia has been poorly evaluated. In this study, correspondence between individual pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic profile of FVIII and joint condition, physical activity and bleeding phenotype of SHA patients under prophylactic treatment was assessed. Nineteen SHA patients < 18 years old on long-term prophylaxis treatment with FVIII were studied in an observational cross-sectional study. Whole blood was withdrawn before FVIII administration and at five time-points after infusion for a TEG-based pharmacodynamic- and pharmacokinetic-study. Type of prophylaxis and joint condition at inclusion and physical activity as well as onset of treated spontaneous bleeding events in the previous two years were retrospectively assessed. Six patients had suffered at least one treated spontaneous bleeding event and were named as "bleeders". The rest were named as "non-bleeders". Only the half maximal effective concentration of FVIII (FVIII-EC50) for TEG parameters R-time, K-time and α-angle correlated with the bleeding phenotype being significantly higher in bleeders suggestive of a poorer response to FVIII. Poorer joint condition, trough FVIII levels or type of prophylaxis were not definitive predicting variables of bleeding phenotype. In conclusion, this study reveals FVIII-EC50 for the first time as a valuable biomarker to anticipate individual efficacy of prophylaxis in SHA.


Subject(s)
Factor VIII/administration & dosage , Factor VIII/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Hemostatics/administration & dosage , Hemostatics/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Child , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Pilots
7.
J Thromb Haemost ; 16(11): 2184-2195, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30137664

ABSTRACT

Essentials explorer™3 was a double-blinded, multiple-dose escalation trial of subcutaneous concizumab. A pharmacodynamic relationship for unbound TFPI and thrombin generation was confirmed. No serious adverse events and no anti-drug antibodies were observed. explorer™3 data support further clinical development of concizumab in people with hemophilia. SUMMARY: Background Concizumab is a humanized mAb targeting tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), leading to enhanced thrombin generation (TG) potential. explorer™3 (NCT02490787) was a phase 1b, double-blind, multiple-dose escalation trial of subcutaneous concizumab in people with severe hemophilia A without inhibitors. Objectives The primary objective was to evaluate safety. Assessments of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and subcutaneous concizumab immunogenicity were secondary objectives. Patients/Methods Adverse events (AEs), clinical assessments and bleeding episodes were recorded. Plasma concizumab levels and unbound TFPI levels were measured with ELISAs; residual TFPI activity was measured with a chromogenic assay. Standardized assays were used to assess TG, D-dimer and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2 ) levels. explorer™3 was completed after investigation of three dose cohorts (0.25, 0.5 and 0.8 mg kg-1 , once every 4 days) had been completed. Twenty-four patients received 12 doses of concizumab or placebo in a 3 : 1 randomization over a 42-day period. Results No serious AEs and no anti-drug antibodies were observed. Fifty-four mild and two moderate AEs were observed in 19 patients. Concizumab exposure increased with dose in a non-linear manner, confirming target-mediated drug disposition. D-dimer and F1 + 2 levels were increased mostly in the highest dose cohort, in line with previous observations. The level of unbound TFPI decreased in a dose-dependent manner, and was accompanied by a residual TFPI activity decrease and an increase in peak TG. Although the trial was not powered to evaluate efficacy, a trend towards lower bleeding rates was observed in patients in the highest dose cohort. Conclusion explorer™3 data support further clinical development of concizumab for use in people with hemophilia, with or without inhibitors.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacokinetics , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Hemorrhage , Humans , International Cooperation , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Safety , Thrombin/metabolism , Young Adult
8.
Haemophilia ; 24(5): 693-702, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29944195

ABSTRACT

Planning and undertaking elective surgery in people with haemophilia (PWH) is most effective with the involvement of a specialist and experienced multidisciplinary team (MDT) at a haemophilia treatment centre. However, despite extensive best practice guidelines for surgery in PWH, there may exist a gap between guidelines and practical application. For this consensus review, an expert multidisciplinary panel comprising surgeons, haematologists, nurses, physiotherapists and a dental expert was assembled to develop practical approaches to implement the principles of multidisciplinary management of elective surgery for PWH. Careful preoperative planning is paramount for successful elective surgery, including dental examinations, physical assessment and prehabilitation, laboratory testing and the development of haemostasis and pain management plans. A coordinator may be appointed from the MDT to ensure that critical tasks are performed and milestones met to enable surgery to proceed. At all stages, the patient and their parent/caregiver, where appropriate, should be consulted to ensure that their expectations and functional goals are realistic and can be achieved. The planning phase should ensure that surgery proceeds without incident, but the surgical team should be ready to handle unanticipated events. Similarly, the broader MDT must be made aware of events in surgery that may require postoperative plans to be changed. Postoperative rehabilitation should begin soon after surgery, with attention paid to management of haemostasis and pain. Surgery in patients with inhibitors requires even more careful preparation and should only be undertaken by an MDT experienced in this area, at a specialized haemophilia treatment centre with a comprehensive care model.


Subject(s)
Elective Surgical Procedures/methods , Hemophilia A/surgery , Hemophilia A/pathology , Humans
9.
Haemophilia ; 24(4): e187-e193, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29873151

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Haemophilia is one of the most common inherited bleeding disorders in the Emergency Department (ED). The most dangerous site of bleeding is the central nervous system. AIMS: To describe the characteristics of haemophiliacs arrived to our ED following a head trauma and to analyse the incidence of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, analytical, observational study, conducted in a Paediatric ED. We included haemophilic patients aged from birth to 16 years who consulted after a head trauma over a 6-year period. Data collected included age, type of haemophilia and head trauma, symptoms, prophylaxis status, CT imaging, treatment and number of visits to the ED. RESULTS: About 46 males and 85 episodes were analysed. The median age was 2.38 years. Severe haemophilia A was the most frequent type of disease (50%). All head injuries were mild, and the most frequent mechanism was a collision with an object (38.8%). In 62 episodes (72.9%) the patients were asymptomatic. The rest 23 events had symptomatology, being the most common headache (26%), emesis (21.7%) and drowsiness (17.4%). Head CT was obtained in 31 episodes, founding altered results in 10 (6 of them corresponding to ICH). All the patients with ICH had symptomatology. About 37 episodes required admission. CONCLUSION: Intracranial haemorrhage is one of the most dangerous events in haemophiliacs and it may occur after a head trauma. Our study suggests that, in case of head trauma, CT must be obtained in symptomatic patients and in those with additional risk factors. Asymptomatic patients must have prolonged observation.


Subject(s)
Craniocerebral Trauma/complications , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hemophilia A/complications , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Craniocerebral Trauma/diagnosis , Craniocerebral Trauma/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Risk Factors , Tertiary Healthcare
10.
Haemophilia ; 23(6): 868-876, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28851065

ABSTRACT

Monitoring recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) treatment outcomes remains challenging. Thromboelastography (TEG) and the thrombin generation assay (TGA), measure coagulation dynamics over time and are being assessed as potential methods for evaluating and monitoring haemophilia treatment. Lack of standardized TEG/TGA methods makes it difficult to compare results and to establish a correlation with clinical outcomes. AIMS: To compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of rFVIIa after 3×90 µg kg-1 doses vs a single dose (270 µg kg-1 ) in haemophilia patients and to evaluate TEG/TGA results postdosing to determine how these assays relate to PK findings. METHODS: Patients in this open-label, single-centre, randomized, crossover trial received one injection of 270 µg kg-1 rFVIIa crossed over with three injections of 90 µg kg-1 rFVIIa in a non-bleeding state. For TEG, kaolin and tissue factor were used as activators; TGA was performed on frozen platelet-rich and platelet-poor plasma, with and without corn trypsin inhibitor. FVIIa activity was evaluated using in vivo samples. RESULTS: TGA showed a dose-dependent effect of rFVIIa on thrombin generation; TEG revealed lower dose-dependent effects. Both showed some differences between single-/multiple-dose rFVIIa; both supported the PK findings. CONCLUSION: While TEG and TGA are not yet clinically predictive, both supported the PK results. Data suggest that, while a single dose of 270 µg kg-1 rFVIIa provides slightly higher haemostatic potential than the multiple-dose regimen of 3×90 µg kg-1 , the latter results in prolonged activity levels compared with a higher single dose.


Subject(s)
Factor VIIa/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Hemophilia B/drug therapy , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Adult , Area Under Curve , Cross-Over Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Factor VIIa/pharmacokinetics , Hemophilia A/blood , Hemophilia A/metabolism , Hemophilia B/blood , Hemophilia B/metabolism , Humans , Male , Metabolic Clearance Rate , Middle Aged , Recombinant Proteins/pharmacokinetics , Thrombelastography , Thrombin/metabolism , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
12.
Haemophilia ; 23 Suppl 1: 4-13, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27990784

ABSTRACT

The high incidence of inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates in patients with haemophilia A has encouraged debate as to whether product-type plays a role. There is debate in the literature as to whether rFVIII concentrates are associated with a higher incidence of inhibitors compared to pdFVIII products. The management of haemophilia in patients with inhibitors includes on-demand/prophylaxis treatment with bypassing agents, and/or immune tolerance induction (ITI). However, these options create an economic and emotional burden on patients, their families and healthcare practitioners. Although ITI eliminates inhibitors successfully in 60-80% of cases, it is costly. Despite high costs, preliminary data from a decision analytical model have indicated that ITI is economically advantageous compared with on-demand/prophylactic treatment with bypassing agents. In patients with persistent inhibitors and those who are not candidates for ITI or have failed ITI, bleeding-related mortality and morbidity increase and quality of life decreases, compared with non-inhibitor patients. This article provides an update on the risk of inhibitor development and discusses best management approaches for patients with high-risk factors for inhibitor development.


Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Factor Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Factor VIII/antagonists & inhibitors , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Blood Coagulation Factor Inhibitors/pharmacology , Humans , Observational Studies as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
13.
Thromb Res ; 148: 38-44, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27770665

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Inhibitor development in people with haemophilia is a serious complication that may require intensive and costly interventions. The goal of inhibitor management should be permanent inhibitor eradication through immune tolerance induction (ITI), but well-designed studies are lacking and the management of patients is therefore defined by the experience and views of the clinician. OBJECTIVES: To explore the current clinical practice and outcome of ITI therapy in Europe and how this may have changed over the last decade, as well as to provide consensus recommendations to guide clinicians in their clinical practice. METHODS: A survey was conducted among 16 European haemophilia comprehensive care centres to evaluate current ITI treatment regimens and success rates in severe and mild/moderate haemophilia A and haemophilia B. In addition, an updated literature review was performed as guidance for providing recommendations. RESULTS: We demonstrated successful inhibitor treatment in 86% of severe haemophilia A patients with low responding (LR) and 59% of patients with high responding (HR) inhibitors. Some new trends in the management of patients with inhibitors were identified, including a tendency to use low-dose regimens (<50IU/kg/d) in both children and adults with HR inhibitors possibly based on similar success rates demonstrated in the I-ITI study compared to a high-dose protocol. Data on ITI therapy in mild and moderate haemophilia as well as haemophilia B were limited. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of ITI therapy seems to be stable over time, and treatment regimens remain heterogeneous. The use of low dose regimens however is considered more frequently.


Subject(s)
Hemophilia A/therapy , Hemophilia B/therapy , Immune Tolerance , Immunosuppression Therapy/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Europe , Female , Hemophilia A/immunology , Hemophilia B/immunology , Humans , Immunosuppression Therapy/adverse effects , Male , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
14.
Haemophilia ; 22(6): 859-865, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27329267

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is a standard intervention to eradicate inhibitors in haemophilic patients. However, information on the long-term condition of patients who eradicated the inhibitor totally or partially after ITI is scarce. AIM: To perform a long-term follow-up to describe the status of patients reported as ITI success in the G-ITI study. METHODS: This was an international, multicentre, observational, retrospective study of the 57 haemophilic patients who were reported as ITI success in the G-ITI study. Demographics and post-ITI clinical data recorded until January 2015 were extracted from the medical records. A descriptive analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were evaluable. Post-ITI follow-up was 9.1 years in average. Thirty-seven target joints were affected in 21 patients; 38 patients presented bleeding with a mean of 1.0 ± 1.2 episodes year-1 , most of them (271/330) treated with Fanhdi® (Grifols). Around half of the patients underwent at least one surgical procedure. Most venous access complications were of expected nature, requiring hospital stay in practically all cases. Fanhdi was used in 42 patients as the regular haemophilia treatment after ITI, mainly prophylactically. Three patients (6.8%) who were being treated with Fanhdi (prophylaxis), Kogenate (prophylaxis) and Emoclot (on demand), respectively, showed inhibitor relapse (at 29, 53 and 13 months after ITI, with 0.9, 3.65 and 12.5 BU respectively). All of them were successfully tolerized after rescue ITI. CONCLUSION: After ITI success, all patients continued with regular successful FVIII treatment for haemophilia for more than 9 years. The few inhibitor relapses were successfully overcome after rescue ITI.


Subject(s)
Factor VIII/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Immune Tolerance/genetics , von Willebrand Factor/therapeutic use , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
16.
Haemophilia ; 22(1): 87-95, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26202305

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Development of neutralizing inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII) is a major complication of haemophilia A treatment. AIM: The ongoing, international, open-label, uncontrolled, observational immune tolerance induction (ObsITI) study evaluates ITI, the standard of care in patients with inhibitors. PATIENTS/METHODS: Forty-eight prospective patients in this interim analysis received a single plasma-derived, von Willebrand factor-stabilized, FVIII concentrate (pdFVIII/VWF) for ITI. According to recommended Bonn protocol, 'low responders' at ITI start (<5 BU) received 50-100 IU FVIII kg(-1) daily, or every other day; 'high responders' (≥5 BU) received 100 IU FVIII kg(-1) every 12 h. RESULTS: Forty of 48 patients (83.3%), had at least one risk factor for poor ITI-prognosis at ITI start (i.e. age ≥7 years, >2 years since inhibitor diagnosis, inhibitor titre ≥10 BU at the start of ITI, or prior ITI failure). Nonetheless, 34 patients (70.8%) achieved complete success, 3 (6.3%) partial success, 1 (2.1%) partial response; ITI failed in 10 patients (20.8%), all with poor prognosis factors. All six low responders achieved complete success. ITI outcome was significantly associated with inhibitor titre level at ITI start (P = 0.0068), number of poor prognosis factors for ITI success (P = 0.0187), monthly bleeding rate during ITI (P = 0.0005) and peak inhibitor titre during ITI (P = 0.0007). Twenty-two of 35 high responder patients (62.9%) with ≥1 poor prognosis factor achieved complete success. CONCLUSION: Treatment with a single pdFVIII/VWF concentrate, mainly according to the Bonn protocol, resulted in a high ITI success rate in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors and poor prognosis for ITI success.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Factor VIII/immunology , Factor VIII/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Hemophilia A/immunology , Immune Tolerance/drug effects , von Willebrand Factor/immunology , von Willebrand Factor/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Drug Combinations , Factor VIII/adverse effects , Female , Hemophilia A/complications , Hemorrhage/complications , Humans , Infant , Male , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Safety , Young Adult , von Willebrand Factor/adverse effects
17.
Haemophilia ; 21(4): 458-64, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25649244

ABSTRACT

Treatment adherence in adolescents with chronic diseases is around 50%, and failure is more common in preventive therapy. In haemophilia, contradictory results are reported by the published studies. The objective of this study was to evaluate adherence with factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis in Spanish patients with severe haemophilia A between age 6 and 20 years. Data were collected retrosp-ectively in the previous 2 years. The primary endpoint was the absolute adherence index (AAI), and the endpoints were related to clinical status, age, prophylaxis regimen, responsibility for factor administration and quality of life (QoL), assessed by the Haemo-QoL questionnaires. A total of 78 patients from 14 Spanish hospitals were recruited. Adherence ranged between -64.4 and 66.7 (mean -3.08). No differences were observed between children and adolescents (7.11 vs. 6.39; P = 0.809). A statistically significant association (P < 0.010) between infra adherent group and target joint was found, as was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.010) between the number of bleeding episodes experienced by the adherent group (mean 1.4) and by infra adherents (mean 4.5). There was no significant difference between AAI and prophylactic regimen (6.35 vs. 6.96, P = 0.848), neither between AAI and the person responsible for factor administration (5.57 vs. 8.79, P = 0.326). The Haemo-QoL scores (8-12 years) were related to adherence level (P < 0.05). Adherence was approximately ideal and patients perceived a high QoL. Because of the repercussions for compliance, it is essential to work during puberty on emotional and self-acceptance aspects of the disease, as well as coping, and the patient's family, school and health team relationships.


Subject(s)
Hemophilia A/psychology , Patient Compliance , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Factor VIII/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Hemophilia A/pathology , Humans , Male , Parents/psychology , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
19.
J Thromb Haemost ; 13(3): 370-9, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25495795

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Turoctocog alfa (NovoEight(®)) is a human recombinant coagulation factor VIII (rFVIII) for the treatment of patients with hemophilia A. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of turoctocog alfa in all age groups across clinical trials. PATIENTS/METHODS: Data from previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A (FVIII activity level of ≤ 1%) with no history of FVIII inhibitors, in a non-bleeding state, were included. The pharmacokinetics were assessed following a wash-out period and a subsequent single intravenous 50 IU kg(-1) dose of turoctocog alfa. Blood was sampled during a 48-h period postdose. Standard pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were estimated on the basis of plasma FVIII activity vs. time (PK profiles) with non-compartmental methods. Furthermore, a population PK analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Data from 76 patients (aged 1-60 years) enrolled globally across six clinical trials were included, totaling 105 turoctocog alfa PK profiles. Single-dose PK results 3-6 months after the first dose of turoctocog alfa were comparable with the results obtained after the first dose. Similar PK characteristics were shown for different lots and strengths of the drug product. Overall, area under the plasma concentration (activity) curve from administration to infinity (AUC) and t1(/2) tended to increase with increasing age, with lower AUC and shorter t(1/2) being seen in children than in adolescents and adults. The PK profiles of turoctocog alfa and other commercially available plasma-derived FVIII and rFVIII products were similar in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: The PK characteristics of turoctocog alfa have been thoroughly studied, and shown to be consistent over time, reproducible between different lots and strengths of drug product, and similar to those observed for other FVIII products.


Subject(s)
Coagulants/pharmacokinetics , Factor VIII/pharmacokinetics , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Area Under Curve , Child , Child, Preschool , Clinical Trials as Topic , Coagulants/administration & dosage , Coagulants/adverse effects , Coagulants/blood , Factor VIII/administration & dosage , Factor VIII/adverse effects , Half-Life , Hemophilia A/blood , Hemophilia A/diagnosis , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Biological , Severity of Illness Index , Therapeutic Equivalency , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...