Systematic documentation of the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Objective: To document the process of introducing COVID-19 vaccines in a selection of Latin American and Caribbean countries, including the lessons learned and the strengths and weaknesses, and similarities and differences among programs. Methods: This descriptive study is based on a systematic evaluation of the process of introducing COVID-19 vaccines in Argentina, Belize, Brazil, Costa Rica, Panama and Peru. Data were collected through a questionnaire distributed to key stakeholders. Six informants from each of the included countries participated in this study. The period of the study was from December 2021 through September 2022. Results: The main strengths reported by countries were health workers' commitment to delivering vaccinations, evidence-based decision-making, the development of plans for vaccine introduction, the participation of national immunization technical advisory groups, the availability of economic resources and positive actions from the respective Ministry of Health. The main challenges were the actions of antivaccination groups, problems with electronic immunization registries, a lack of vaccines, delays in the delivery of vaccines and the scarcity of health personnel at the local level. Conclusions: Commitment, the participation of multiple sectors, the availability of resources and preparedness planning were some of the many strengths shown by countries introducing COVID-19 vaccines. Weaknesses included third parties' interests, the lack of information systems and difficulty in accessing vaccines and vaccine services. There is a window of opportunity for countries to maintain the good practices that allowed for the processes' strengths and to assess the identified weaknesses to invigorate immunization programs and prepare for future health crises.

Systematic documentation of the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines in Latin America and the Caribbean / Documentación sistemática de la introducción de vacunas contra la COVID- 19 en América Latina y el Caribe / Documentação sistemática da introdução das vacinas contra a COVID-19 na América Latina e no Caribe

[ABSTRACT]. Objective. To document the process of introducing COVID-19 vaccines in a selection of Latin American and Caribbean countries, including the lessons learned and the strengths and weaknesses, and similarities and differences among programs. Methods. This descriptive study is based on a systematic evaluation of the process of introducing COVID-19 vaccines in Argentina, Belize, Brazil, Costa Rica, Panama and Peru. Data were collected through a questionnaire distributed to key stakeholders. Six informants from each of the included countries participated in this study. The period of the study was from December 2021 through September 2022. Results. The main strengths reported by countries were health workers’ commitment to delivering vaccinations, evidence-based decision-making, the development of plans for vaccine introduction, the participation of national immunization technical advisory groups, the availability of economic resources and positive actions from the respective Ministry of Health. The main challenges were the actions of antivaccination groups, problems with electronic immunization registries, a lack of vaccines, delays in the delivery of vaccines and the scarcity of health personnel at the local level. Conclusions. Commitment, the participation of multiple sectors, the availability of resources and preparedness planning were some of the many strengths shown by countries introducing COVID-19 vaccines. Weaknesses included third parties’ interests, the lack of information systems and difficulty in accessing vaccines and vac- cine services. There is a window of opportunity for countries to maintain the good practices that allowed for the processes’ strengths and to assess the identified weaknesses to invigorate immunization programs and prepare for future health crises.

[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Documentar el proceso de introducción de las vacunas contra la COVID-19 en un algunos países de América Latina y el Caribe, incluidas las enseñanzas extraídas y sus puntos fuertes y débiles, así como las similitudes y diferencias entre los distintos programas. Métodos. Este estudio descriptivo se basa en una evaluación sistemática del proceso de introducción de las vacunas contra la COVID-19 en Argentina, Belice, Brasil, Costa Rica, Panamá y Perú. Los datos se recopilaron mediante un cuestionario distribuido a las principales partes interesadas. El estudio contó con la participación de un informante de cada uno de los seis países incluidos. El período de estudio fue de diciembre del 2021 a septiembre del 2022. Resultados. Los países indicaron como puntos fuertes principales el compromiso del personal de atención de salud con la vacunación, la toma de decisiones basada en la evidencia, la formulación de planes para la introducción de las vacunas, la participación de grupos técnicos asesores nacionales sobre inmunización, la disponibilidad de recursos económicos y las medidas favorables adoptadas por respectivos los Ministerios de Salud. Los retos más importantes fueron las acciones de los grupos contrarios a las vacunas, los problemas con los registros electrónicos de vacunación, la falta de vacunas, los retrasos en la entrega de vacunas y la escasez de personal de atención de salud a nivel local. Conclusiones. Se observó que el compromiso, la participación de múltiples sectores, la disponibilidad de recursos y la planificación de la preparación eran algunos de los puntos fuertes de los países que introdujeron las vacunas contra la COVID-19. Los puntos débiles fueron los intereses de terceros, la falta de sistemas de información y las dificultades para acceder a las vacunas y a los servicios de vacunación. Los países disponen ahora de una oportunidad para mantener las buenas prácticas que propiciaron los puntos fuertes de los procesos y evaluar los puntos débiles identificados a fin de fortalecer los programas de inmunización y prepararse para futuras crisis de salud.

[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Documentar o processo de introdução da vacina contra a COVID-19 em alguns países da América Latina e do Caribe, incluindo as lições aprendidas e os pontos fortes e fracos, bem como semelhanças e diferenças entre os programas. Métodos. Este estudo descritivo baseia-se em uma avaliação sistemática do processo de introdução das vacinas contra a COVID-19 na Argentina, em Belize, no Brasil, na Costa Rica, no Panamá e no Peru. Os dados foram coletados por meio de um questionário distribuído às principais partes interessadas. Seis informantes de cada um dos países incluídos participaram do estudo, que foi realizado entre dezembro de 2021 e setembro de 2022. Resultados. Os principais pontos fortes relatados pelos países foram o comprometimento dos profissionais de saúde com a vacinação, a tomada de decisões baseadas em evidências, o desenvolvimento de planos para a introdução de vacinas, a participação de grupos técnicos assessores nacionais sobre imunização, a disponibilidade de recursos econômicos e ações positivas dos respectivos ministérios da Saúde. Os principais desafios foram as ações de grupos antivacina, problemas com os registros eletrônicos de imunização, a falta de vacinas, atrasos na entrega das vacinas e a escassez de pessoal de saúde em nível local. Conclusões. O comprometimento, a participação de vários setores, a disponibilidade de recursos e o planejamento de preparação foram alguns dos muitos pontos fortes demonstrados pelos países ao introduzirem as vacinas contra a COVID-19. Entre os pontos fracos estavam os interesses de terceiros, a falta de sistemas de informação e a dificuldade de acesso às vacinas e aos serviços de vacinação. Há uma janela de oportunidade para que os países mantenham as boas práticas que viabilizaram os pontos fortes dos processos e avaliem os pontos fracos identificados a fim de revigorar os programas de imunização e preparar-se para futuras crises sanitárias.

Antibiotic prescription patterns in patients with suspected urinary tract infections in Ecuador.

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are among the most common cause to prescribe antibiotics in primary care. Diagnosis is based on the presence of clinical symptoms in combination with the results of laboratory tests. Antibiotic therapy is the primary approach to the treatment of UTIs; however, some studies indicate that therapeutics in UTIs may be suboptimal, potentially leading to therapeutic failure and increased bacterial resistance. METHODS: This study aimed to analyze the antibiotic prescription patterns in adult patients with suspected UTIs and to evaluate the appropriateness of the antibiotic prescription. This is a cross-sectional study of patients treated in outpatient centers and in a second-level hospital of the Ministry of Public Health (MOPH) in a city in Ecuador during 2019. The International Classification of Disease Tenth Revision (ICD-10) was used for the selection of the acute UTI cases. The patients included in this study were those treated by family, emergency, and internal medicine physicians. RESULTS: We included a total of 507 patients in the analysis and 502 were prescribed antibiotics at first contact, constituting an immediate antibiotic prescription rate of 99.01%. Appropriate criteria for antibiotic prescription were met in 284 patients, representing an appropriate prescription rate of 56.02%. Less than 10% of patients with UTI had a urine culture. The most frequently prescribed antibiotics were alternative antibiotics (also known as second-line antibiotics), such as ciprofloxacin (50.39%) and cephalexin (23.55%). Factors associated with inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for UTIs were physician age over forty years, OR: 2.87 (95% CI, 1.65-5.12) p<0.0001, medical care by a general practitioner, OR: 1.89 (95% CI, 1.20-2.99) p = 0.006, not using point-of-care testing, OR: 1.96 (95% CI, 1.23-3.15) p = 0.005, and care at the first level of health, OR: 15.72 (95% CI, 8.57-30.88) p<0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study indicate an appropriate prescription rate of 56.02%. Recommended antibiotics such as nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin for UTIs are underutilized. The odds for inappropriate antibiotic prescription were 15.72 times higher at the first level of care compared to the second. Effective strategies are needed to improve the diagnosis and treatment of UTIs.

Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in Ecuador: A test-negative design.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic poses a significant global health threat, characterized by high morbidity, severity, and the emergence of concerning variants. Latin America has been greatly affected, with high infection and mortality rates. Vaccination plays a crucial role in mitigating severe disease and controlling the pandemic. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 severe acute respiratory infections (SARI) in hospitalized vaccination target groups in Ecuador. Methods: This is a test-negative design study. We used data reported through sentinel surveillance of SARI between May 2021 and March 2022 in Ecuador. Patients with case criteria of SARI and hospitalized for a minimum of 24 hours were included in the study. Cases were defined as patients with SARI with a positive RT-qPCR test for SARS-CoV-2 and controls were those with a negative result. Information on vaccination status was obtained from the national vaccination registry, a valid dose of vaccination was considered when it was administered at least 14 days prior to symptom onset. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) (1-OR/OR) was calculated using a logistic regression. Results: A total of 1,277 patients were included in the analysis of VE. The adjusted vaccine effectiveness (aVE) in preventing hospitalization, adjusted for sex, age group, presence of one or more comorbidities, and period of the predominance of the omicron variant, was 44.5% for the partial primary schedule, 74.7% for the complete primary schedule, and 79.9% for the complete primary schedule plus booster doses. The aVE in avoiding ICU admissions was close to 80% with both the complete primary schedule and the booster doses, and in avoiding deaths, the aVE was 89% and 98%, respectively. Conclusions: In Ecuador, COVID-19 vaccination prevents hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and deaths. The effectiveness of the vaccines improves with more doses, offering increased protection across all age groups.

Antibiotic Prescription Patterns in Children Under 5 Years of Age With Acute Diarrhea in Quito-Ecuador.

BACKGROUND: Diarrheal disease remains a significant cause of child mortality, particularly in regions with limited access to healthcare and sanitation. Inappropriate practices, including unjustified medication prescriptions, pose challenges in the management of acute diarrhea (AD), especially in low- and middle-income countries. OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed antibiotic prescription patterns and assessed compliance with Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) guidelines in children under 5 with AD in the Ministry of Public Health (MOPH) Ambulatory Care Centers of Quito city, Ecuador. METHODS: A cross-sectional design was used, collecting electronic health records (EHR) of patients diagnosed with AD from 21 health facilities in District 17D03. A probabilistic and stratified sampling approach was applied. Patient characteristics, prescriber characteristics, treatments, and compliance of IMCI guideline recommendations were evaluated. A stepwise logistic regression analysis examined the association between antibiotic prescription and patient and physician characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 359 children under 5 years of age were included, with 58.77% being girls. 85.24% of the cases of AD were attributed to gastroenteritis and colitis of infectious and unspecified origin. Amebiasis and other protozoal intestinal diseases accounted for 13.37% and 1.11% of the cases, respectively. The completion rates of recording various IMCI parameters varied; parameters such as duration of diarrhea, presence of blood in stool, and evidence of sunken eyes had high completion rates (100%, 100%, and 87.47%, respectively), while parameters like state of consciousness, presence of thirst, and type of diarrhea had low completion rates (0.28%, 0.28%, and 0.84%, respectively). None of the cases had all parameters fully recorded. Antimicrobials were prescribed in 38.72% of the cases. Children aged 3 to 5 years had higher odds of receiving antimicrobial prescription for AD (aOR: 4.42, 95% CI 2.13-9.18, P < .0001) compared to those under 1 year, after adjusting for the number of loose stools per day, gender, and age of the health professional. CONCLUSION: Variations in IMCI guideline compliance were observed, with no cases fully adhering to the guidelines. Antimicrobial prescription rates were notably high, especially among older children. Further research and specialized interventions are necessary to gain comprehensive insight into the factors underlying non-compliance with the IMCI guidelines.

A Pilot Study on the Use of Low Doses of CBD to Control Seizures in Rare and Severe Forms of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.

Due to its anticonvulsant properties, cannabidiol can be supportive as an adjuvant therapy in the management of drug resistant epilepsy. This retrospective observational study evaluates the intensity and frequency of the seizures of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy that have been treated with antiepileptic medication associated with CBD in low doses for at least 12 months. Thirty-four patients were included in the study. The most frequent diagnosis of epilepsy was focal symptomatic epilepsy and Lennox−Gastaut syndrome (35.2%). During the follow-up, there was a statistically significant decrease in the seizure frequency (t student p < 0.001). A high proportion of patients, 16, concluded the study with a total control of the seizures reaching a 100% improvement, 12 reported ≥ 75% improvement, 3 ≥ 50%, and 2 ≥ 25%; only 1 patient had an improvement of less than 25%. This is the first Latin American study that demonstrates that long-term CBD added to the usual drugs significantly reduces the frequency, duration, and type of seizures in the different etiologies of epilepsy, being especially effective on the seizures that are the most incapacitating, improving the quality of life of the individual and their family.

A Comparative Analysis of a Self-Reported Adverse Events Analysis after Receiving One of the Available SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Schemes in Ecuador.

The COVID-19 pandemic has put a lot of pressure on health systems worldwide. Mass vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 has reduced morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite their safety profiles, vaccines, as with any other medical product, can cause adverse events. Yet, in countries with poor epidemiological surveillance and monitoring systems, reporting vaccine-related adverse events is a challenge. The objective of this study was to describe self-reported vaccine adverse events after receiving one of the available COVID-19 vaccine schemes in Ecuador. A cross-sectional analysis based on an online, self-reported, 32-item questionnaire was conducted in Ecuador from 1 April to 15 July 2021. Participants were invited by social media, radio, and TV to voluntarily participate in our study. A total of 6654 participants were included in this study. Furthermore, 38.2% of the participants reported having at least one comorbidity. Patients received AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sinovac vaccines, and these were distributed 38.4%, 31.1%, and 30.5%, respectively. Overall, pain or swelling at the injection site 17.2% (n = 4500) and headache 13.3% (n = 3502) were the most reported adverse events. Women addressed events supposedly attributable to vaccination or immunization [ESAVIs] (66.7%), more often than men (33.2%). After receiving the first dose of any available COVID-19 vaccine, a total of 19,501 self-reported ESAVIs were informed (87.0% were mild, 11.5% moderate, and 1.5% severe). In terms of the vaccine type and brand, the most reactogenic vaccine was AstraZeneca with 57.8%, followed by Pfizer (24.9%) and Sinovac (17.3%). After the second dose, 6776 self-reported ESAVIs were reported (87.1% mild, 10.9% moderate, and 2.1% severe). AstraZeneca vaccine users reported a higher proportion of ESAVIs (72.2%) in comparison to Pfizer/BioNTech (15.9%) and Sinovac Vaccine (11.9%). Swelling at the injection site, headache, muscle pain, and fatigue were the most common ESAVIs for the first as well as second doses. In conclusion, most ESAVIs were mild. AstraZeneca users were more likely to report adverse events. Participants without a history of COVID-19 infection, as well as those who received the first dose, were more prone to report ESAVIs.

Return on Investment of 10-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in Ecuador From 2010 to 2030.

OBJECTIVES: Ecuador introduced the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in 2010. A recent time series analysis has demonstrated the impact of 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV10) on hospitalized pneumococcal disease in children. We leveraged these estimates to calculate the return on investment (ROI) of PCV10 in Ecuador from 2010 to 2030 at the national and regional levels. METHODS: We used 2 approaches to estimate the economic benefits: (1) cost of illness, which includes treatment, transportation, and productivity loss averted, (2) and the value of statistical life, which reflects society's average willingness to pay to save one life. Costs of the immunization program include vaccine costs (doses, syringes, injection supplies) and immunization delivery costs (personnel, cold chain equipment and maintenance, transportation, distribution services, and other recurrent costs). We estimated the ROI by dividing the net benefits by costs. RESULTS: The ROI using the cost-of-illness approach was slightly negative in the introduction year. From 2011 to 2020, we estimated the ROI to be 0.45 (0.15-0.73). For the future decade, the ROI is estimated at 0.37 (-0.03 to 1.03). Using the value-of-statistical-life approach, the ROI was 1.46 (0.82-2.17) in the introduction year. In the first decade, the ROI was 1.01 (0.49-1.60); in the second decade, the ROI fell to 0.83 (0.23-1.78). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate the total economic benefits of PCV10 in Ecuador exceed immunization program costs after the introduction year. Estimates from this study will inform country policy makers and will contribute to efforts to mobilize resources for immunization.

Soft-Tissue Sarcomas in Adults in Ecuador in the Period 2010-2020.

Background: Soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare tumors; they represent 1% of all tumors in adults. There are new diagnostic techniques to differentiate tumor types, and surgery continues to be the most important treatment for STS. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed the morbidity and mortality caused by STS in adults between 2010 and 2020 using national databases. Results: A total of 8,393 patients hospitalized due to STS were reported. The total number of deaths in Ecuador due to STS was 7,088 over the last decade, the provinces of Pichincha and Guayas registered the highest number of cases, and the mortality rate was 1.2 to 2.0 per 100,000 people. It is noteworthy that the lowest point of registered cases was in 2012. Conclusion: Soft-tissue sarcomas are rare tumors in Ecuador. The morbidity and mortality caused by these tumors have not changed in the last decade. National studies are needed to determine the prevalence of this illness and study intervention to lower mortality.

Medical Cost of Upper Respiratory Tract Infections in Children in Ambulatory Care.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate the direct cost per episode and the annual cost for upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) in children in Ambulatory Health Centers of the Ministry of Public Health (MSP) of Ecuador. METHODS: A cost of illness study with a provider perspective was carried out through a micro-costing of health resources and valuated in international dollars. Medical visits, laboratory tests, imaging examinations, and other procedures were valued using the tariff framework of services for the National Health System, and for prescribed medication a reported cost registry of pharmacy purchases made in the year of study was used. RESULTS: We included 380 electronic health records of children. We found a re-consultation rate of 22.89%, a medicine prescription rate of 95.52%, and an antibiotic prescription rate of 45.26%. The first medical consultation accounted for 71.9% of the total cost of URTI, the following visits accounted for 11.82%, and medication accounted for 14.68%. Antibiotics accounted for 58.92% of the total cost of medication. CONCLUSION: The direct medical cost to the MSP of Ecuador of 1 episode of URTI in children in primary care was around I$37.28 (2017 dollars) (95% CI: I$35.81-I$38.75). The total cost of URTI cases in children to the MSP in 2017 was at least I$50.478 million (2017 dollars) (95% CI I$48.527m-I$52.523m). Re-consultation and the prescription of medication represent an important component of the direct cost of medical care of URTI.

Morbidity and Mortality Due to Pneumococcal Disease in Children in Ecuador from 2005 to 2015.

INTRODUCTION: Studies have shown that pneumococcal disease significantly increases morbidity and mortality rates in children 5 years old and under. These infections constitute the main cause of preventable deaths in the world, considering the availability of vaccination. Considering that Ecuador is in a high incidence region, despite the introduction of the vaccine, this study aims to describe the burden of hospitalized pneumococcal disease and related mortality in our country between 2005 and 2015, to help decision-making processes for the health authorities. METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzes morbidity, mortality, and the situation in Ecuador caused by pneumococcal disease in children 5 years old and under between 2005 and 2015 using national databases. RESULTS: A total of 163,852 cases of children 5 years old and under were reported to have been hospitalized due to pneumococcal-related diseases. Males comprised 54.7% of the cases and females 45.3%. In 36% of the cases, the patients were 1 year old or under. The mortality rate due to pneumococcal disease in Ecuador in children aged 5 and under decreased in 48% during 2005-2015. CONCLUSION: The decrease in mortality can be related to the introduction of the vaccine and an increase in access to health care by the general population in the country. It is important to study the specific impact of the vaccine in the reduction of morbidity and mortality of children in Ecuador.

Impact of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on pneumonia hospitalization and mortality in children and elderly in Ecuador: Time series analyses.

BACKGROUND: Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) reduce the burden of invasive pneumococcal disease and pneumonia hospitalizations. However, there is limited evidence of the effect of PCVs on pneumonia mortality in children. It is anticipated that indirect effects resulting from PCV use among children might further reduce the remaining burden of adult pneumococcal disease caused by pneumococcal serotypes contained in PCV. Whether this will result in reduced pneumonia mortality in children and adults is still not known. METHODS: We investigated the impact of PCV on pneumonia hospitalization and mortality in in Ecuador, where PCV was introduced in 2010, considering national data from secondary data sources from 2005 to 2015. Time series analysis using regression models were used to evaluate the decline in the number of all-cause pneumonia hospitalizations and deaths in the period post-PCV introduction. The target populations were children under 5 years and adults aged 50 years and over. Outcomes of interest were hospitalizations and mortality in which the main cause of hospital admission and death, respectively, were coded as ICD10 codes J12-18 (pneumonia). Three different models were fitted. RESULTS: We demonstrate a sizeable impact of PCV in pneumonia hospitalization in children < 1 year (27% reduction, 95%CI 12-42%), and < 5 years of age (33% reduction, 95%CI 11-43%). The estimated impact of PCV in pneumonia mortality was a reduction of 14% in < 1 year (95%CI 0-33%), 10% in < 5 years (95%CI 0-25%), and 22% (95%CI 7-34%) in adults aged 50-64 years. Little evidence of a change was detected in elderly ≥ 65 years. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to report on the impact of PCV in pneumonia morbidity and mortality in children and older adults, being relevant to policy makers and global donors. Findings were consistent when using different models. Additional studies on the indirect effect of PCV in older adults are needed.

Mental disorders in systemic lupus erythematosus: a cohort study.

Currently, the evaluation of mental disorders in patients with Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is essential in the management of the illness because of their impact in morbimortality. The main purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of mental disorders in a group of patients with SLE in a tertiary referral hospital in Quito-Ecuador. The main diffuse central nervous system psychiatric syndromes in SLE (psychosis, anxiety and mood disorders) and cognitive dysfunction were evaluated with the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview and the Montreal scale, respectively. This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study which included patients 15 years and older diagnosed with SLE in a tertiary referral hospital in Quito, Ecuador. 85 patients diagnosed with SLE attending the internal medicine outpatient clinic during October 2017-May 2018 were included. A bivariate analysis of possible associations between these mental disorders with corticosteroid use, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), and quality of life was also studied. Eighty-five patients, with an average age of 34.12 ± 11.5 years were included, of which 94% were females. 71% of participants (60 patients) had at least one mental disorder evaluated in this study. The most frequent was cognitive impairment (n = 43, 51%) followed by anxiety disorders (n = 35, 41%), mood disorders (n = 34, 40%) and psychosis (n = 1; 1%). 38% presented mild cognitive impairment and 13% had moderate cognitive impairment. Memory and visuospatial/executive function were the most affected domains in the cognitive assessment. 38% of participants were previously diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome, of which 78% had a mental disorder (OR = 1.83, p = 0.2). Most patients (n = 84; 99%) were treated with corticosteroids, of these, 59 patients presented a mental disorder (OR = 0.9, p = 0.8). Associations with APS or corticosteroid use were not statistically significant. However, the multivariate regression suggests an association between presence of mental disease and quality of life. There were statistically significant alterations in anxiety/depression and pain. There is a high prevalence of neuropsychiatric syndromes in this cohort of patients. Almost ¾ of our cohort had at least one mental disorder, the most common was cognitive impairment.

"Appropriateness and adequacy of antibiotic prescription for upper respiratory tract infections in ambulatory health care centers in Ecuador".

BACKGROUND: Upper respiratory tract infections are the leading cause of misuse of antibiotics, a problem that leads to unnecessary adverse events and antibiotic resistance. Antibiotic prescription in Ecuador was analyzed in order to evaluate the state of antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections. Both the appropriateness and adequacy of prescribing was evaluated. Appropriateness represents the percentage of prescriptions that are indicated; adequacy refers to the percentage of patients requiring antibiotics who are treated. METHODS: The aim of the study is to analyze the appropriateness and adequacy of antibiotic prescription for upper respiratory tract infections in the Ambulatory Health Centers of the Ministry of Public Health of Ecuador. This is a cross-sectional study of patients from one Health Center of the Ministry of Public Health in the District 17D03 in Ecuador during 2015 with upper respiratory tract infection as a primary diagnosis. RESULTS: We included a total of 1393 patients in the analysis. Out of the 1393 patients identified, 523 were prescribed antibiotics, constituting an antibiotic prescription rate of 37.5%, and 51 required antibiotics, reflecting a real need of antibiotics of 3.7%. Appropriateness: Of these 523 patients who were treated, 51 required an antibiotic, resulting in an appropriate antibiotic prescription rate of 9.75%. Adequacy: When analyzing each individual case, 33 of these 51 patients received an antibiotic, constituting an adequate prescription rate of 64.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study report a 90.25% of inappropriate prescription. The antibiotic prescription, appropriate prescription, and adequate prescription rates show the need for implementation of strategies in order to reduce them. Related aspects regarding prescriber's behavior and the patient's expectations should be analyzed.

Cannabidiol: uso en epilepsias refractarias / Cannabidiol: its use in refractory epilepsies

Introducción. Algunos síndromes epilépticos se caracterizan por crisis de difícil control y asocian un retraso en el desarrollo neuropsicomotor, lo que conlleva un deterioro en la calidad de vida del paciente y su familia. Objetivo. Evaluar el uso del cannabidiol como tratamiento adyuvante en pacientes con epilepsias refractarias. Pacientes y métodos. Se realizó un estudio observacional por medio de una encuesta dirigida a la persona cuidadora del paciente. Se valoró la información sobre el paciente y el cuidador, cambios observados sobre las crisis, efectos neuropsicológicos, efectos adversos y percepción global de la familia tras el uso del cannabidiol. Resultados. Se evaluó a 15 pacientes con epilepsias refractarias, quienes recibieron cannabidiol durante un período de un mes a un año. En el 40% de los pacientes hubo una disminución en la frecuencia de las crisis, en el 60% de los pacientes se observó un control de más del 50% de las crisis y en el 27% las crisis desaparecieron totalmente. También se comunicaron cambios neurocognitivos: en el 73% hubo una mejoría del comportamiento; el 60% notificó una mejoría en el lenguaje; el 50%, en el sueño; el 43%, en la alimentación; y el 100%, en el estado de ánimo. La percepción global sobre la enfermedad notificó una mejoría en el 73%. Los efectos adversos más frecuentes fueron somnolencia y fatiga. Conclusiones. Estos resultados sugieren un posible efecto beneficioso del cannabidiol sobre el control de las crisis y en la mejoría de ciertos aspectos neurocognitivos en pacientes con epilepsias refractarias (AU)

Introduction. Some epileptic syndromes are characterised by seizures that are difficult to control and are associated to delayed neuropsychomotor development, which results in a deterioration in the patient’s quality of life as well as in that of his or her family. Aim. To evaluate the use of cannabidiol as adjuvant therapy in patients with refractory epilepsies. Patients and methods. An observational study was conducted by means of a survey addressed to the patient’s caregiver. Data collected included information about the patient and the caregiver, changes observed in the seizures, neuropsychological effects, side effects and the family’s overall perception following the use of cannabidiol. Results. The evaluation examined 15 patients with refractory epilepsies, who received cannabidiol over a period ranging from one month to one year. The frequency of seizures decreased in 40% of the patients, 60% of the patients were seen to have control over 50% of their seizures and in 27% of them the seizures disappeared completely. Neurocognitive changes were also reported: behaviour improved in 73%; 60% reported an improvement in language; in 50% sleep improved; 43% reported improvements in eating habits; and 100% said their mood had improved. The overall perception of the illness was that there had been improvements in 73% of respondents. The most common side effects were drowsiness and fatigue. Conclusions. These results suggest a possible beneficial effect of cannabidiol on the control of seizures and on the improvement of certain neurocognitive aspects in patients with refractory epilepsies (AU)

Conducto biliar aberrante del segmento VI con terminación a nivel del conducto cístico: reporte de caso / Aberrant bile duct of the segment VI with termination at the level of the conduit cystic: case report

La colecistectomía laparoscópica es uno de los procedimientos quirúrgicos más comunes en la actualidad. En los Estados Unidos, aproximadamente 700 mil colecistectomías se realizan anualmente, el 70% de las cuales se llevan a cabo por vía laparoscópica. La morbilidad postoperatoria, mortalidad y estancia hospitalaria se reducen con la colecistectomía laparoscópica, por lo cual ha tomado el lugar de la colecistectomía abierta como el procedimiento operativo estándar para colecistitis [1]; sin embargo, conlleva una mayor incidencia de lesión de la vía biliar, debido a que el procedimiento laparoscópico ofrece una limitada visibilidad en tres dimensiones y en el sentido táctil. Por otra parte, las anomalías y variaciones anatómicas de los conductos biliares y del sistema vascular representan retos operatorios y un riesgo para complicaciones posoperatorias. Las anomalías de los segmentos hepáticos derechos representan un 20% de las variantes anatómicas biliares. Sin embargo, la total independencia de un segmento hepático o de un sector supone sólo un 2% de las malformaciones congénitas del árbol biliar. Aunque un conducto hepático aberrante que desemboca en el conducto cístico no es especialmente raro, el conducto hepático derecho que desemboca en el conducto cístico es extremadamente infrecuente, con sólo seis casos reportados hasta el momento.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the surgical procedures most common today. In the United States, approximately 700 thousand cholecystectomies are performed annually, 70% of which they are carried out laparoscopically. Postoperative morbidity, mortality and hospital stay are reduced with cholecystectomy laparoscopic, which has taken the place of cholecystectomy open as the standard operating procedure for cholecystitis [1]; without However, it entails a higher incidence of bile duct injury, due to that the laparoscopic procedure offers limited visibility in three dimensions and in the tactile sense. On the other hand, anomalies and anatomical variations of the ducts Biliary and vascular system represent operational challenges and a risk to postoperative complications. Abnormalities of hepatic segments rights represent 20% of biliary anatomical variants. Without However, the total independence of a liver segment or a sector it accounts for only 2% of the congenital malformations of the biliary tree. Even though an aberrant hepatic duct that empties into the cystic duct it is not especially rare, the right hepatic duct that empties in the cystic duct is extremely infrequent, with only six cases reported so far.