Prevalence of Comorbidities and Polypharmacy in a Historically Minoritized Community and Their Impact on Virologic Suppression in Persons with HIV.

Improved life expectancy from advances in antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been followed by a rise in comorbidities and polypharmacy in this aging population. Historically, polypharmacy has been associated with suboptimal virologic outcomes in persons with HIV, although data in the current ART era and among historically marginalized populations in the United States are limited. We measured the prevalence of comorbidities and polypharmacy, evaluating their impact on virologic suppression. This retrospective IRB-approved cross-sectional study reviewed health records of adults with HIV on ART and receiving care (≥2 visits) in 2019 at a single center in a historically minoritized community. Virologic suppression (HIV RNA <200 copies/mL) based on polypharmacy (≥5 non-HIV medications) or multimorbidity (≥2 chronic conditions) was evaluated. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with virologic suppression, with age, race/ethnicity, and CD4 < 200 cells/mm3 as covariates. Of the 963 individuals that met the criteria, 67%, 47%, and 34% had ≥1 comorbidity, multimorbidity, and polypharmacy, respectively. The cohort demographics were: mean of 49 years (range, 18-81), 40% cisgender women, 46% Latinx individuals, 45% Black individuals, 8% White individuals. Virologic suppression rates were 95% among patients with polypharmacy compared with 86% in those with a lower pill burden (p = 0.0001). The odds of virologic success were higher for individuals with polypharmacy [adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 2.3 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.2-4.4)] and Latinx identity [aOR = 2.4 (95% CI: 1.5-3.8)], but lower if a CD4 count <200 cells/mm3 [aOR = 0.07 (95% CI: 0.04-0.1)]. The comorbidity burden was higher than previously described, which are driving polypharmacy rates. In the current ART era, polypharmacy is not inherently associated with worse virologic outcomes.

Evaluation of Statin Prescribing Practices and Predictors of Statin Underutilization in Persons With HIV.

BACKGROUND: Persons with HIV (PWH) have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared with those without HIV. Despite the increased risk, PWH are less likely to be prescribed statin therapy compared with the general population. The purpose of this study is to describe the statin prescribing practices of an outpatient HIV clinic and identify potential predictors of statin underutilization. METHODS: This study was a retrospective, single-center chart review of PWH ages 40-79 years receiving care at an HIV clinic. Statin eligibility, statin prescribing practices, and appropriateness of statin therapy were evaluated. Logistical regression analyses were conducted to assess for predictors of underutilization of statin therapy. RESULTS: Of the 606 patients, statin therapy was indicated in 362 patients (60%). Among those with a statin indication, 60.2% were prescribed appropriate statin therapy, 11.6% were prescribed statin therapy but not at the indicated intensity, and 28.2% were not prescribed statin therapy. Tobacco use ( P = 0.0023) was identified as a predictor of statin underutilization. The odds of statin prescribing were higher for those with clinical atherosclerotic CVD ( P = 0.004) and hypertension ( P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Statin underutilization was significantly higher in PWH smoking tobacco and PWH without atherosclerotic CVD or low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol 190 mg/dL or higher. In addition, this study highlights the need for more robust CVD prevention efforts in PWH. Identifying predictors of statin underutilization may aid in elucidating where gaps in cardiovascular prevention care may exist.

Readmission Rates of Patients Discharged on Antipsychotic Polypharmacy Compared to Antipsychotic Monotherapy.

Antipsychotic medications are used to treat many psychiatric conditions and are paramount for relapse prevention in patients with mental illnesses. Antipsychotic monotherapy (APM) is a commonly recommended approach, however there is no clear consensus on the use of antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP). A single-center retrospective review was conducted comparing readmission rates of behavioral health patients discharged on APP or APM between August 1st 2019 and July 31st 2021. The primary outcome was the one-year psychiatric readmission rate. Secondary outcomes included further readmission time frame stratification, olanzapine equivalent doses, and use of anticholinergic medications. The total readmission rate was 24.5% (24/98) in the APP group compared to 19.1% (107/560) in the APM group (p = 0.22). Patients discharged on APM were not found to have a statistically significant increase in readmission rate compared to patients discharged on APP. Further research is needed to assess the risks and benefits of APP.

Hepatitis C virus micro-elimination within a clinic for people with HIV: challenges in the home stretch.

OBJECTIVES: To describe a pharmacist-led campaign aimed at reducing the proportion of people with HIV with ongoing chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and delineating barriers to HCV care in this patient population. METHODS: An electronic report and retrospective chart review were used to identify patients who remained with HCV infections after a previous treatment initiative. A clinical pharmacist and pharmacy resident approached the remaining HCV patients during their routine visits for HIV care to offer and coordinate direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment. The primary end-point was to compare the prevalence of chronic HCV before and after the intervention period. Barriers to care were also evaluated, with logistic regression performed to identify predictors of sustained virologic response (SVR) attainment. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were included in the analysis (4.2% of clinic population), with HCV prevalence falling to 0.6% (six patients) by the end of the study (p < 0.0001). The HCV care cascade in the cohort was as follows: 70% agreed to and received DAA therapy, 63% initiated therapy, and 50% achieved SVR. The top barriers to care at baseline included recreational drug use (67%), poor engagement in care (61%), and mental health disorders (28%). Poor engagement in care and active recreational drug use were associated with decreased odds of achieving SVR in bivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: A coordinated effort can make strides towards reducing the overall burden of HCV in this challenging population. The HCV care cascade remains tied to the HIV continuum of care, with poor engagement in care remaining an important rate-limiting step impeding micro-elimination.

When Coadministration Cannot Be Avoided: Real World Experience of Direct Acting Antivirals for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Patients on First Generation Anticonvulsants.

BACKGROUND: Coadministration of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and first generation anticonvulsants is currently not recommended due to a drug-drug interaction that could potentially lead to subtherapeutic DAA levels and subsequent treatment failure. Currently, there is limited data evaluating this interaction and timely treatment of HCV infection with DAAs is imperative to prevent liver-related morbidity and mortality. METHODS: A retrospective case series evaluating clinical cure of chronic HCV infection, defined as sustained virologic response (SVR) 12 weeks after completion of DAA therapy, in patients from three inner-city clinics who remained on first generation anticonvulsants during the treatment course. RESULTS: A total of five patients received standard dose DAAs for treatment of chronic HCV infection while being maintained on first generation anticonvulsants. The most common HCV genotype was 1a (80%), followed by 1b (20%). The majority of patients were treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (80%) for eight weeks and one patient was treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for 12 weeks. Anticonvulsant regimens consisted of carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenytoin plus phenobarbital, phenytoin plus levetiracetam, and phenobarbital plus lacosamide. All five patients achieved sustained virologic response (SVR) despite this drug-drug interaction. CONCLUSION: Although every effort to prevent concomitant use of DAAs and potent inducers should be made, clinical cure may still be achieved in patients whom cannot avoid this coadministration.

Pharmacists' Perceptions and Drivers of Immunization Practices for COVID-19 Vaccines: Results of a Nationwide Survey Prior to COVID-19 Vaccine Emergency Use Authorization.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists play a vital role in recommending and providing vaccines to improve public health and are on the front line of mass immunization efforts. AIM: The objective of this study is to evaluate pharmacists' perceptions on COVID-19 vaccines prior to emergency use authorization (EUA) amid a global pandemic. METHODS: A voluntary, anonymous, cross-sectional survey was conducted between September and November 2020. Survey respondents included a convenience sample of licensed pharmacists in the United States. The primary outcomes were pharmacists' willingness to receive and recommend hypothetical COVID-19 vaccines. Covariates assessed in the survey included COVID-19 exposure or personal experience, primary pharmacy practice setting, background in training, geographic region, and prioritization of clinical data. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS: This study surveyed 763 pharmacists and results from 632 participants were included in final analysis. Overall, 67.1% of the pharmacists were willing to receive a COVID-19 vaccine and 63.4% of the pharmacists were willing to recommend a COVID-19 vaccine at ≤1 year from the time of vaccine approval. At >1 year after vaccine approval, 78% of the pharmacists were willing to receive a COVID-19 vaccine and 81.2% of the pharmacists were willing to recommend a COVID-19 vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Survey findings suggest that, while a majority of pharmacists surveyed indicate acceptance of hypothetical COVID-19 vaccines, there remains to be hesitancy among pharmacists to receive or recommend vaccination.

Drug interaction after ritonavir discontinuation: considerations for antiretroviral therapy changes in renal transplant recipients.

Organ transplantation among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV) is increasing. Guidelines recommend any changes in antiretroviral therapy (ART) prior to transplantation, but there are limited data regarding ART changes post transplantation. We report a case where an ART switch from a protease inhibitor-based regimen to dolutegravir plus emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in a renal transplant recipient led to subtherapeutic tacrolimus concentrations and an increased serum creatinine (SCr). A workup for graft rejection was performed (including kidney biopsy and cytomegalovirus and BK virus polymerase chain reaction) following the rise in SCr, which was higher than expected from dolutegravir initiation (via organ cation transporter 2 inhibition). This case highlights the potential challenges of switching ART regimens in PLHIV post transplantation.

Hepatitis A vaccine response in HIV-infected patients: are TWINRIX and HAVRIX interchangeable?

INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection remains a health risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected persons. Seroconversion rates among HAV vaccinated HIV-infected patients have been shown to be reduced compared to the general population. Current guidelines regard HAV vaccines as interchangeable, however there no published data comparing their efficacy in HIV patients. Our study evaluated the impact of different factors, including type of vaccination, on the immunologic response to hepatitis A vaccination in HIV-infected patients in the HAART era. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 226 HIV-infected patients at our clinic in Newark, NJ. Patients were eligible if at least one dose HAVRIX (1440 ELISA units) or TWINRIX (720 ELISA units) was administered and had anti-HAV antibody data pre- and post-vaccination. Numerous variables were evaluated for their effect on seroconversion. RESULTS: Seroconversion developed in 53.5% of the population. Responders had higher baseline median CD4 counts (446 versus 362 cells/mm(3); P=0.004) and lower median HIV RNA levels (475 copies/mL versus 5615 copies/mL; P=0.018) than non-responders. Patients with CD4 counts>350 cell/mm(3) were more likely to respond than those with CD4 counts<200 cell/mm(3), 60% and 35%, respectively (P=0.0498). Responders were also more likely to be virologically suppressed (48% versus 32%; P=0.0024). TWINRIX recipients had a 7-fold increased probability of seroconversion when virologically suppressed and less likely to respond if the vaccination series was not completed (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.18-0.96). DISCUSSION: Seroconversion rates to HAV vaccination are significantly impaired among HIV-infected patients. CD4 cell count and virologic suppression at vaccination impact response. Seroconversion among TWINRIX recipients appeared to be more sensitive to these factors and vaccine series completion in comparison to those administered HAVRIX. Among HIV-patients requiring hepatitis a and b vaccination, the advantage of TWINRIX over HAVRIX as a combination product should be reevaluated.