Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Nanomedicine ; 16: 4873-4889, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34295160

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We aimed to develop a nanocarrier formulation incorporating fenbendazole (FEN) and rapamycin (RAPA) with strong efficacy against A549 cancer cells. As FEN and RAPA are poorly soluble in water, it is difficult to apply them clinically in vivo. Therefore, we attempted to resolve this problem by encapsulating these drugs in polymeric micelles. METHODS: We evaluated drug synergy using the combination index (CI) values of various molar ratios of FEN and RAPA. We formed and tested micelles composed of different polymers. Moreover, we conducted cytotoxicity, stability, release, pharmacokinetic, and biodistribution studies to investigate the antitumor effects of FEN/RAPA-loaded mPEG-b-PCL micelles. RESULTS: We selected mPEG-b-PCL-containing FEN and RAPA at a molar ratio of 1:2 because these particles were consistent in size and had high encapsulation efficiency (EE, %) and drug loading (DL, %) capacity. The in vitro cytotoxicity was assessed for various FEN, RAPA, and combined FEN/RAPA formulations. After long-term exposures, both the solutions and the micelles had similar efficacy against A549 cancer cells. The in vivo pharmacokinetic study revealed that FEN/RAPA-loaded mPEG-b-PCL micelles had a relatively higher area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 2 h (AUC0-2 h) and 0 to 8 h (AUC0-8 h) and plasma concentration at time zero (Co) than that of the FEN/RAPA solution. The in vivo biodistribution assay revealed that the IV injection of FEN/RAPA-loaded mPEG-b-PCL micelles resulted in lower pulmonary FEN concentration than the IV injection of the FEN/RAPA solution. CONCLUSION: When FEN and RAPA had a 1:2 molar ratio, they showed synergism. Additionally, using data from in vitro cytotoxicity, synergism between a 1:2 molar ratio of FEN and RAPA was observed in the micelle formulation. The FEN/RAPA-loaded mPEG-b-PCL micelle had enhanced bioavailability than the FEN/RAPA solution.


Subject(s)
Micelles , Capsules , Drug Carriers , Fenbendazole , Humans , Polyesters , Polyethylene Glycols , Polymers , Sirolimus , Tissue Distribution
2.
Pharmaceutics ; 12(10)2020 Oct 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33096915

ABSTRACT

Fenbendazole (FEN), a broad-spectrum benzimidazole anthelmintic, suppresses cancer cell growth through various mechanisms but has low solubility and achieves low blood concentrations, which leads to low bioavailability. Solubilizing agents are required to prepare poorly soluble drugs for injections; however, these are toxic. To overcome this problem, we designed and fabricated low-toxicity Soluplus® polymeric micelles encapsulating FEN and conducted toxicity assays in vitro and in vivo. FEN-loaded Soluplus® micelles had an average particle size of 68.3 ± 0.6 nm, a zeta potential of -2.3 ± 0.2 mV, a drug loading of 0.8 ± 0.03%, and an encapsulation efficiency of 85.3 ± 2.9%. MTT and clonogenic assays were performed on A549 cells treated with free FEN and FEN-loaded Soluplus® micelles. The in vitro drug release profile showed that the micelles released FEN more gradually than the solution. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed lower total clearance and volume of distribution and higher area under the curve and plasma concentration at time zero of FEN-loaded Soluplus® micelles than of the FEN solution. The in vivo toxicity assay revealed that FEN-loaded Soluplus® micelle induced no severe toxicity. Therefore, we propose that preclinical and clinical safety and efficacy trials on FEN-loaded Soluplus® micelles would be worthwhile.

3.
Arch Pharm Res ; 43(1): 100-109, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31989478

ABSTRACT

Insufficient efficacy of current single drug therapy of cancers have led to the advancement of combination drug-loaded formulations. Specifically, polymeric micelles have been focused on as efficient injectable vehicles for the delivery of several anticancer drugs simultaneously to cancer cells. These nano delivery systems have evolved with advancements in the area of nanotechnology. The current review presents a summary of the past events that have led to the procession of nanomicelles and novel nanotechnologies for combinatorial drug delivery. It also focuses on the advantages, disadvantages, and considerations for the design of nanotechnologies for combinatorial drug delivery systems. The opportunities and challenges of nanotechnologies in drug delivery to overcome current disadvantages are also discussed. Furthermore, we have added findings regarding the trends and perspectives regarding nanotechnologies for combinatorial anticancer drug delivery.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Drug Delivery Systems , Nanoparticles/chemistry , Nanotechnology , Animals , Humans , Micelles
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...