Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
World J Urol ; 34(4): 533-7, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25841361

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of three-dimensional (3D) printing on the surgical planning, potential of training and patients' comprehension of minimally invasive surgery for renal tumors. METHODS: Patients of a T1N0M0 single renal tumor and indicated for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy were selected. CT data were sent for post-processing and output to the 3D printer to create kidney models with tumor. By presenting to experienced laparoscopic urologists and patients, respectively, the models' realism, effectiveness for surgical planning and training, and patients' comprehension of disease and procedure were evaluated with plotted questionnaires (10-point rating scales, 1-not at all useful/not at all realistic/poor, 10-very useful/very realistic/excellent). The size of resected tumors was compared with that on the models. RESULTS: Ten kidney models of such patients were fabricated successfully. The overall effectiveness in surgical planning and training (7.8 ± 0.7-8.0 ± 1.1), and realism (6.0 ± 0.6-7.8 ± 1.0) were reached by four invited urologists. Intraoperative correlation was advocated by the two performing urologists. Patients were fascinated with the demonstration of a tactile "diseased organ" (average ≥ 9.0). The size deviation was 3.4 ± 1.3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Generating kidney models of T1N0M0 tumors with 3D printing are feasible with refinements to be performed. Face and content validity was obtained when those models were presented to experienced urologists for making practical planning and training. Understandings of the disease and procedure from patients were well appreciated with this novel technology.


Subject(s)
Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnosis , Kidney/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Nephrectomy/methods , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Female , Humans , Kidney/surgery , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
2.
Int Braz J Urol ; 40(1): 87-92, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24642154

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The percutaneous renal access (PRA) is the most critical step of percutaneous renal surgery (PRS). For the training of PRA in the lab, a novel non-biological bench model was developed and set for validation test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experts in PRS (> 60 cases) and novices were included to perform fluoroscopy guided PRA on the model. Overall time, X-ray exposure time and puncture attempts were recorded to establish construct validity. After accomplishment, the experts rated the model using a standardized questionnaire for face and content validity based on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 denoting very bad and 5 as excellent. Baseline and post-training data of novices were analyzed for skill acquisition. RESULTS: 9 experts and 30 novices were finally included. The overall appraisal was 4 by the experts, and consensus of all experts was reached for the model as an excellent training tool. Significant difference between experts and novices was detected with the experts using less total time 183.11 ± 29.40 vs. 278.00 ± 50.30 seconds (P < 0.001), shorter X-ray exposure time 109.22 ± 19.93 vs. 183.13 ± 38.83 seconds (P < 0.001), and fewer attempts 1.28 ± 0.44 vs. 2.35 ± 0.65 (P < 0.001). After training, the novices demonstrated significant skill improvement in total and fluoroscopy time, and number of attempts (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our non-biological model provides a new method for PRA training. The face, content and construct validity were demonstrated. This model allows contact with PRA skills and could be applied to the first step in the learning curve.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Education, Medical/methods , Models, Anatomic , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/methods , Humans , Learning Curve , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
3.
Urology ; 83(5): 999-1002, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24507896

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the difference and relative advantages between minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) in supine position and flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) in the management of surgically indicated single large stone in the proximal ureter. METHODS: Patients with single large stone in the proximal ureter with slight to moderate hydronephrosis were prospectively selected and assigned into groups of MPCNL and FURS on the basis of the patient's choice. Demographic data, operative duration, postoperative hospital stay, complication rate, and stone-free rate were recorded and compared. RESULTS: From October 2010 to May 2012, 76 such patients were consecutively included into the study. No significant difference was found in preoperative demographics, including age, sex, and severity of hydronephrosis. Stone size was 15.6 ± 2.5 and 14.9 ± 2.3 mm (P = .349), operative duration 49.3 ± 11.7 and 67.2 ± 17.3 minutes (P <.001), postoperative hospital stay 4.2 ± 1.1 and 1.8 ± 0.8 days (P <.001), stone-free rate (residual ≤ 3 mm) 93.7% and 84.1% (P = .198), and complication rate over grade II (modified Clavien system) 12.5% and 6.8% (P = .398) in MPCNL and FURS groups respectively. CONCLUSION: Both MPCNL in supine position and FURS are effective and safe surgical options for patients with single large stone in the proximal ureter, when indicated. FURS is associated with faster recovery and less invasiveness than MPCNL in supine position.


Subject(s)
Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/methods , Patient Positioning/methods , Supine Position , Ureteral Calculi/surgery , Ureteroscopy , Adult , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Ureteroscopes
4.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 40(1): 87-92, Jan-Feb/2014. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-704183

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The percutaneous renal access (PRA) is the most critical step of percutaneous renal surgery (PRS). For the training of PRA in the lab, a novel non-biological bench model was developed and set for validation test. Materials and Methods: Experts in PRS (> 60 cases) and novices were included to perform fluoroscopy guided PRA on the model. Overall time, X-ray exposure time and puncture attempts were recorded to establish construct validity. After accomplishment, the experts rated the model using a standardized questionnaire for face and content validity based on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 denoting very bad and 5 as excellent. Baseline and post-training data of novices were analyzed for skill acquisition. Results: 9 experts and 30 novices were finally included. The overall appraisal was 4 by the experts, and consensus of all experts was reached for the model as an excellent training tool. Significant difference between experts and novices was detected with the experts using less total time 183.11 ± 29.40 vs. 278.00 ± 50.30 seconds (P < 0.001), shorter X-ray exposure time 109.22 ± 19.93 vs. 183.13 ± 38.83 seconds (P < 0.001), and fewer attempts 1.28 ± 0.44 vs. 2.35 ± 0.65 (P < 0.001). After training, the novices demonstrated significant skill improvement in total and fluoroscopy time, and number of attempts (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Our non-biological model provides a new method for PRA training. The face, content and construct validity were demonstrated. This model allows contact with PRA skills and could be applied to the first step in the learning curve. .


Subject(s)
Humans , Clinical Competence , Education, Medical/methods , Models, Anatomic , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/methods , Learning Curve , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
5.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 92(44): 3151-4, 2012 Nov 27.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23328431

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of modification of transferrin on cytotoxicity and intracellular delivery of paclitaxel loaded Poly (lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticle (NPs). METHODS: PLGA NPs were formulated with microemulsion method, Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) was used as surfactant (PVA NPs). Transferrin (Tf) was used to modify the NPs (Tf NPs). The cytotoxicity of paclitaxel solution and paclitaxel loaded PVA NPs and Tf NPs were measured in bladder cancer cell line J-82. The intracellular delivery of two kinds of NPs was measured. RESULTS: The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of paclitaxel loaded PVA NPs and Tf NPs was (44 ± 7) and (49 ± 11) ng/ml respectively and significantly lower than that of paclitaxel solution, which was (81 ± 18) ng/ml (both P < 0.05). The uptake of PVA NPs and Tf NPs by J-82 cells after 2 hours was (89 ± 19) µg/mg cellular protein and (76 ± 16) µg/mg cellular protein. The uptake of two kinds of NPs had no significantly difference. The intracellular level of NPs decreased significantly upon the withdrawal of NPs in medium. However, it became stable 2 hours later and 11.3% PVA NPs and 18.0% Tf NPs remained. The intracellular level of PVA NPs and Tf NPs had no significantly difference at any time point. NPs were distributed in cytoplasm after endocytosis. CONCLUSIONS: PLGA NPs can significantly improve the anti-neoplastic effect of paclitaxel on bladder cancer. However, modification of Tf does not change the intracellular dynamics.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/pharmacology , Paclitaxel/pharmacology , Transferrin/chemistry , Transferrin/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/administration & dosage , Cell Line, Tumor , Drug Carriers/chemistry , Humans , Lactic Acid/chemistry , Nanoparticles/chemistry , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Polyglycolic Acid/chemistry , Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...