Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(37): e30335, 2022 Sep 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36123838

ABSTRACT

Extragastric recurrence after radical resection of stage I gastric cancer is very rare. We investigated the incidence of extragastric recurrence and risk factors in patients who underwent surgical resection of stage I gastric cancer and evaluated the value of abdominal CT as a surveillance tool. This retrospective study enrolled 914 patients with stage I gastric cancer who underwent surgical resection at a single tertiary hospital. We investigated extragastric recurrence during the follow-up period, and disease-free survival (DFS) was assessed. Over a median follow-up period of 39 months, the overall incidence of extragastric recurrence was 2.2% (20/914). Risk factors for extragastric recurrence included deep submucosal invasion (SM2-3), muscularis propria invasion, and lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio [HR]=10.37, 28.101, and 6.843; P = .028, .002, and .001, respectively). Based on the number of risk factors, patients were stratified into 3 subgroups: low-risk (pT1aN0, pT1b(SM1)N0, 496/914), moderate-risk (pT1aN1, pT1b(SM1)N1, pT1b(SM2-3)N0, pT2N0, 369/914), and high-risk (pT1b(SM2-3)N1, 49/914). DFS was significantly longer in the low-risk group, followed by the moderate-risk and high-risk groups. We propose that postoperative CT surveillance should be omitted for stage 1A cases involving the mucosa and SM1 because of the extreme rarity of extragastric recurrence.


Subject(s)
Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Stomach Neoplasms/epidemiology , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
2.
J Sep Sci ; 45(15): 2795-2803, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35614582

ABSTRACT

In order to effectively and quickly monitor such illegal food and drugs, simultaneous screening and quantitative analysis for multiple compounds are needed. In this study, we established a method of identifying fragmentation ions of 45 compounds for weight loss using liquid chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry and developed a quantitation method through liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. Note that, 656 samples selected as health functional food, food, and illegal drug were applied. The detection rate of banned weight loss compounds in health functional food, food, and illegal drug was showed as 19.2, 27.3, 40.7%, respectively. Among them, sibutramine, sennoside A and B, ephedrine were most frequently detected in 237 samples that contained weight loss compounds. The detection range about sibutramine was 0.03-159.3 mg/g, sennoside was 0.1-97.6 mg/g, and ephedrine was 0.1-587.7 mg/g in the detected 237 samples. In addition, the unknown compounds not included in our simultaneous analysis method in some samples were identified as furosemide and chlorpheniramine. High selectivity of high resolution mass spectrometry combined with these fragmentation pathways and tandem mass spectrometry methods can be successfully applied to screening and identifying 45 weight loss compounds for continuous blocking and supervision of illegally distributed health functional food, food, and illegal drug.


Subject(s)
Illicit Drugs , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Chromatography, Liquid , Ephedrine , Functional Food , Humans , Sennosides , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Weight Loss
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...