Improved process design for monoclonal antibody charge variants separation with multicolumn counter-current solvent gradient purification.

The multicolumn counter-current solvent gradient purification (MCSGP) method has proven effective in addressing the issue of elution profile overlap for difficult-to-separate proteins, leading to improved purity and recovery. However, during the MCSGP process, the flow rate and proportion of loaded proteins undergo changes, causing a significant discrepancy between the elution profiles of batch process design and the actual MCSGP process. This mismatch negatively impacts the purity and recovery of the target protein. To address this challenge, an improved process design (reDesign) was proposed with the first-run MCSGP to mimic the actual continuous process and obtain elution profiles that closely resemble the real ones. The reDesign was demonstrated with both a model protein mixture and a sample of monoclonal antibody (mAb) with charge variants. For model protein mixture, the reDesign-based MCSGP process (reMCSGP) showed a remarkable improvement in recovery, increasing from 83.6% to 97.8% while maintaining a purity of more than 95%. For mAb sample, the recovery of reMCSGP improved significantly to 93.9%, surpassing the performance of normal MCSGP processes at a given purity level of more than 84%. In general, the new process design strategy developed in this work could generate a more representative elution profile that closely mirrors actual conditions in continuous processes, which enhances the separation performance of MCSGP.

Model-assisted process design for better evaluation and scaling up of continuous downstream bioprocessing.

Continuous process is a promising alternative for tradition batch process in biomanufacturing, which has higher productivity and lower material consumption. However, despite the maturation of necessary technologies for continuous process, there are few discussion about optimization of full continuous process. One possible reason is that the continuous process is such a complex and interacted process that the traditional experiment-based optimization approach is not sufficient anymore. To address that problem, the process simulation tool SuperPro Designer and continuous capture chromatography model were integrated into a model-assisted design platform for better development of continuous process. The influences of different continuous capture operation modes and sub-lot number under various upstream conditions were analyzed for pilot-scale production. The best combination of operation mode and sub-lot number were determined for the highest equipment utilization without any conflict. After the process optimization, the equipment utilization of continuous process was significantly improved to 27.3%. Then, a pilot-scale case study was carried out to validate the proposed approach. The results showed that the scaling up and process design of continuous process were successful. No time conflict and process failure happened and the final product met the release specification. Finally, the cost of goods was evaluated with SuperPro Designer, and the results showed a 17.4% cost reduction for optimized continuous downstream process compared to batch process, which is promoting for the future industrial applications.

A novel twin-column continuous chromatography approach for separation and enrichment of monoclonal antibody charge variants.

Downstream processing of mAb charge variants is difficult owing to their similar molecular structures and surface charge properties. This study aimed to apply a novel twin-column continuous chromatography (called N-rich mode) to separate and enrich acidic variants of an IgG1 mAb. Besides, a comparison study with traditional scaled-up batch-mode cation exchange (CEX) chromatography was conducted. For the N-rich process, two 3.93 mL columns were used, and the buffer system, flow rate and elution gradient slope were optimized. The results showed that 1.33 mg acidic variants with nearly 100% purity could be attained after a 22-cycle accumulation. The yield was 86.21% with the productivity of 7.82 mg/L/h. On the other hand, for the batch CEX process, 4.15 mL column was first used to optimize the separation conditions, and then a scaled-up column of 88.20 mL was used to separate 1.19 mg acidic variants with the purity of nearly 100%. The yield was 59.18% with the productivity of 7.78 mg/L/h. By comparing between the N-rich and scaled-up CEX processes, the results indicated that the N-rich method displays a remarkable advantage on the product yield, i.e. 1.46-fold increment without the loss of productivity and purity. Generally, twin-column N-rich continuous chromatography displays a high potential to enrich minor compounds with a higher yield, more flexibility and lower resin cost.

Intermaxillary tooth-size discrepancies in different sexes, malocclusion groups, and ethnicities.

INTRODUCTION: To achieve proper occlusion, practitioners must consider tooth-size discrepancies between the jaws. Previous studies have shown considerable differences in tooth sizes between sexes, ethnicities, and malocclusion categories. The aim of this study was to compare mean tooth-size statistics between these groups, specifically determining a maxillary or a mandibular excess tooth-size discrepancy in clinically relevant cases. METHODS: This study involved 306 subjects of varying sex, ethnicity, and malocclusion category, randomly chosen from the treatment population of the orthodontic clinic at the New Jersey Dental School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. The prevalence of discrepancies (±1 and 2 SD) between all groups and within groups was measured. RESULTS: Fifty percent of the subjects had anterior Bolton tooth-size discrepancies, and 41% had overall Bolton tooth-size discrepancies of ±1 SD. Tooth-size ratios compared with analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed no significant correlation between and among the sexes, ethnicities, and malocclusion groups. Compared with Caucasian and Hispanic patients, African-American patients had significantly greater odds of having a clinically significant (±2 SD) anterior ratio. When we compared the numbers of subjects above or below the clinically significant ratio, there was equal distribution of maxillary and mandibular excess in Class II and Class III patients. Caucasian and African-American patients had equal distributions of maxillary and mandibular excess, whereas Hispanic patients displayed a higher bias toward mandibular excess. CONCLUSIONS: Tooth-size discrepancies are common in orthodontic populations and are evenly distributed among sex, ethnicity, and malocclusion category, with some exceptions.