ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To assess the severity of glaucoma and its worsening using Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity (SPARCS). To evaluate its correlation with retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL) and perimetry. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 90 eyes of primary open-angle glaucoma were categorized into mild, moderate, and severe glaucoma (30 each). All eyes were subjected to contrast sensitivity measurements by using the Pelli-Robson (PR) chart and SPARCS, Humphrey automated perimetry, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) RNFL, along with routine ophthalmological evaluation at baseline. Contrast sensitivity was repeated at 1, 3, and 6 months. Other investigations were repeated at 6 months. The correlation between contrast sensitivity and other parameters was analyzed at baseline and 6 months. RESULTS: Total SPARCS showed a significant positive correlation with visual field index, pattern standard deviation, mean deviation, OCT RNFL, and a negative correlation with best corrected visual acuity. Central SPARCS and PR scores exhibited strong positive correlations. Both total and quadrantic SPARCS significantly reduced from mild to moderate to severe glaucoma. The quadrant-wise SPARCS also correlated well with opposite-side RNFL thickness. At 6 months, SPARCS showed a significant reduction along with RNFL measurements preceding any significant changes in visual field parameters. CONCLUSION: This study establishes SPARCS as a reliable and reproducible tool in assessing the deterioration of visual function in glaucoma patients even before significant perimetric changes. The specific relationship of quadrantic SPARCS with opposite-side RNFL is a novel yet expected finding. The findings advocate integrating SPARCS into routine glaucoma assessment for timely detection of any worsening and prompt intervention, improving the visual outcomes in these patients.
ABSTRACT
Background & objectives: Legionella pneumophila, a ubiquitous aquatic organism is found to be associated with the development of the community as well as hospital-acquired pneumonia. Diagnosing Legionella infection is difficult unless supplemented with, diagnostic laboratory testing and established evidence for its presence in the hospital environment. Hence, the present study was undertaken to screen the hospital water supplies for the presence of L. pneumophila to show its presence in the hospital environment further facilitating early diagnosis and prevention of hospital-acquired legionellosis. Methods: Water samples and swabs from the inner side of the same water taps were collected from 30 distal water outlets present in patient care areas of a tertiary care hospital. The filtrate obtained from water samples as well as swabs were inoculated directly and after acid buffer treatment on plain and selective (with polymyxin B, cycloheximide and vancomycin) buffered charcoal yeast extract medium. The colonies grown were identified using standard methods and confirmed for L. pneumophila by latex agglutination test. Results: About 6.66 per cent (2/30) distal water outlets sampled were found to be contaminated with L. pneumophila serotype 2-15. Isolation was better with swabs compared to water samples. Interpretation & conclusions: The study showed the presence of L. pneumophila colonization of hospital water outlets at low levels. Periodic water sampling and active clinical surveillance in positive areas may be done to substantiate the evidence, to confirm or reject its role as a potential nosocomial pathogen in hospital environment.
