ABSTRACT
This study aimed to investigate the relationship between perceived/performance-based executive function and IQ. Additionally, the relationship between perceived executive function and intelligence was investigated cross-culturally between South Korea and China. Korean children (60; M = 34, F = 26, Mean age = 10.35) were included in study 1, and Korean children (43, M = 23, F = 20, Mean age = 10.05) and Chinese children (56; M = 29, F = 27, Mean age = 10.40) were included in study 2. The Korean-Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-IV, the Stroop test, the CTT-2, and the executive function questionnaire were used for Korean subjects, and the Raven's matrix test and the executive function questionnaire were used for Korean and Chinese subjects. Multiple regression showed that CTT-2(RT), emotional control difficulty, and Color Word within a 45' Stroop test trial were significant predictors of total IQ. The cross-cultural analysis showed a statistically significant difference between the two countries in the emotional control aspect of perceived executive function. There were no interactions between country and intelligence. In conclusion, intelligence was related to overall executive function. Korean children and Chinese children showed cultural differences in processing emotion. These results are expected to contribute to developing therapeutic strategies for executive function in children and to exchanging these strategies between Korea and China.
Subject(s)
Cross-Cultural Comparison , Executive Function/physiology , Intelligence/physiology , Analysis of Variance , Asian People , Child , Female , Humans , Intelligence Tests , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Regression Analysis , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Forty three patients with L5-S1 spondylolisthesis undergoing surgical treatment from April 2012 to November 2014 were included for analysis,including 20 cases received transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF group) and 23 cased received posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF group).The incision length,operative time were shorter and blood loss was less in TLIF group than those in PLIF group [(9.6±0.9) vs.(16.1±1.5) cm,(125.6±13.0) vs.(156.4±11.8) minand (218.7±22.5)ml vs.(326.5 ±20.1) ml,respectively,all P =0.000].There was no statistical difference in the S1 pedicle screw (S1PS) insertion point between two approaches[(29.4 ± 1.9) vs.(28.5 ± 1.0) mm,P =0.069],but the distance from the midline to the lateral edge of the screw (12.9 ±3.6) mm,S1PS angle (23.3 ±2.1) ° and length of S1PS length with the sacral body (40.9 ± 2.6) mm in the TLIF group were better than those in PLIF group (P =0.000).Our results demonstrate that the paraspinal muscle approach for the treatment of L5-S1 spondylolisthesis may be superior with less trauma,better functional recovery and stable screw placement.
