Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vnitr Lek ; 69(2): 109-118, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37072269

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the prescription and dosage of essential pharmacotherapy in chronic heart failure (HF) at the time of discharge from the hospitalization for cardiac decompensation and how it may have influenced the prognosis of the patients. METHODS: We followed 4097 patients [mean age 70.7, 60.2% males] hospitalized for HF between 2010 and 2020. The vital status we ascertained from the population registry, other circumstances from the hospital information system. RESULTS: The prescription of beta-blockers (BB) was 77.5% (or only 60.8% of BB with evidence in HF), 79% of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers, and 45.3% of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA). Almost 87% of patients were treated with furosemide at the time of discharge, while only ≈53% of patients with ischemic etiology of HF took a statin. The highest target dose of BB was recommended in ≈11% of patients, RAS blockers in ≈ 24%, and MRA in ≈ 12% of patients. In patients with concomitant renal insufficiency, the prescription of BB and MRA was generally less frequent and on a significantly lower dosage. In contrast, the opposite was true for the RAS blocker (however statistically insignificant). In patients with EF ≤ 40%, the prescription of BB and RAS blockers were more frequent but in a significantly lower dosage. On the contrary, MRAs were recommended in these patients more often and in higher doses. In terms of mortality risk, patients treated only with a reduced dose of RAS blockers showed a 77% higher risk of death within one year (or 42% within five years). A significant relationship was also found between mortality and the recommended dose of furosemide. CONCLUSIONS: The prescription and dosage of essential pharmacotherapy are far from optimal, and in the case of RAS blockers, this affected the patient's prognosis as well.


Subject(s)
Furosemide , Heart Failure , Male , Humans , Female , Furosemide/therapeutic use , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Prognosis , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Stroke Volume , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35444330

ABSTRACT

AIMS: We analyzed the mortality risk and its predictors in patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF). METHODS: Patients discharged from hospitalization for acute decompensation of HF in 2010-2020 and younger than 86 years were followed (n=4097). We assessed the incidence and trends of all-cause death, its main predictors, and the pharmacotherapy recommended at discharge from the hospital. RESULTS: The 30 days all-cause mortality was in discharged patients 3.2%, while 1-year 20.4% and 5-years 55.4%. We observed a modest trend to decreased 1-year mortality risk over time. Any increase of year of hospitalization by one was associated with about 5% lower risk in the fully adjusted model. Regarding predictors of 1-year mortality risk, a positive association was found for age over 65, history of malignancy, and peak brain natriuretic peptide during hospitalization ≥10times higher than normal concentration. In contrast, as protective factors, we identified LDL ≥1.8 mmol/L, treatment with beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin axis blockers, statins, and implanted cardioverter in the same regression model. The ejection fraction category and primary etiology of HF (coronary artery disease vs. others) did not significantly affect the mortality risk in a fully adjusted model. CONCLUSIONS: Despite advances in cardiovascular disease management over the last two decades, the prognosis of patients hospitalized for heart failure remained highly unfavorable.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Angiotensins/therapeutic use , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Hospitalization , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain , Prognosis , Renin/therapeutic use , Stroke Volume
3.
J Comp Eff Res ; 10(12): 979-988, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34114471

ABSTRACT

Aim: Although uric acid has antioxidant effects, hyperuricemia has been established as an indicator of increased cardiovascular mortality in various patient populations. Treatment of asymptomatic hyperuricemia in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) is not routinely recommended, and the efficacy of such treatment in terms of cardiovascular risk reduction remains doubtful. Materials & methods: In a prospective cohort study, we followed 5196 patients admitted for a MI between 2006 and 2018. We assessed the relationship between baseline uricemia and the incidence of all-cause death and cardiovascular mortality and the effect of long-term allopurinol treatment. Hyperuricemia was defined as serum uric acid >450 µmol/l in men and >360 µmol/l in women. Results: In the entire cohort, the 1-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality rates were 8 and 7.4%, and the 5-year rates were 18.3 and 15.3%, respectively. Using a fully adjusted model, hyperuricemia was associated with a 70% increased risk of both all-cause death and cardiovascular mortality at 1 year, and the negative prognostic value of hyperuricemia persisted over the 5-year follow-up (for all-cause death, hazard risk ratio = 1.45 [95% CI: 1.23-1.70] and for cardiovascular mortality, hazard risk ratio = 1.52 [95% CI: 1.28-1.80], respectively). Treatment of asymptomatic hyperuricemia with allopurinol did not affect mortality rates. Conclusion: Hyperuricemia detected in patients during the acute phase of an MI appears to be independently associated with an increased risk of subsequent fatal cardiovascular events. However, hyperuricemia treatment with low-dose allopurinol did not prove beneficial for these patients.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Hyperuricemia , Myocardial Infarction , Allopurinol/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Hyperuricemia/drug therapy , Hyperuricemia/epidemiology , Male , Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Uric Acid
4.
J Comp Eff Res ; 10(3): 219-228, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33541131

ABSTRACT

Aim: We analyzed the mortality risk of myocardial infarction (MI) patients according to renal function, observed during hospitalization. Materials & methods: Patients hospitalized for MI between 2006 and 2018 were followed (n = 5659). We divided the sample into four groups by estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) [ml/min]: normal functions (lowest eGFR during hospitalization >60); transiently moderate insufficiency (lowest eGFR >30 and ≤60, highest >60); permanently moderate insufficiency (highest eGFR >30 and ≤60); severe insufficiency (highest and lowest eGFR ≤30). Results: Permanently moderate renal insufficiency indicates increased 5-years all-cause mortality (hazard risk ratio: 2.27 [95% CIs: 1.87-2.75], p < 0.0001), but a similar risk was found in patients with the only transient decline of renal functions (hazard risk ratio: 2.08 [95% CIs: 1.70-2.55], p < 0.0001). Both moderate insufficiency subgroups (transient/permanent) did not statistically differ regarding mortality risk. Conclusion: Even just fluctuation of eGFR toward moderate insufficiency during hospitalization represents an important prognostic indicator in MI patients.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction , Renal Insufficiency , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Hospitalization , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Prognosis , Renal Insufficiency/epidemiology , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...