Distal radial access and postprocedural ultrasound evaluation of proximal and distal radial artery.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the patency of the proximal and distal radial artery after coronary procedures performed via the distal radial artery (DRA). Ultrasound (US) as the most reliable method was used to diagnose radial artery occlusions (RAO). We evaluated 115 patients who underwent catheterization via distal radial access (dTRA). Following the procedure and after successful hemostasis (80 ± 36 min), arterial patency and diameter at conventional transradial access (cTRA) and distal puncture sites (either in the anatomical snuffbox or the dorsal distal RA) were assessed. No RAO were found in the proximal or distal RA and there were no significant other complications. The mean diameter of the radial artery at conventional puncture site was 2.86 ± 0.49 mm and at distal puncture site 2.31 ± 0.47 mm (p < 0.001). Postprocedural compression time of dTRA was very short. In conclusion distal radial access was associated with the absence of early arterial occlusion, significant local bleeding and other relevant complications.

Post-procedural radial artery occlusion and patency detection using duplex ultrasound vs. the reverse Barbeau test.

The transradial approach is recommended as a first choice in coronary catheterizations and interventions, for among other reasons, the reduction in the number of local complications. A head-to-head comparison of the reverse Barbeau test (RBT) and duplex ultrasonography (DUSG) for the detection of post-procedural radial artery patency and occlusion has not yet been evaluated. In 500 patients from our same-day discharge program (age 65 ± 9.4 years, 148 women), radial artery patency and occlusion, compression time, haematomas, and other local complications were evaluated. Radial artery patency was confirmed in 495 patients (99.0%), and complete radial artery occlusion (RAO) was detected in 2 (0.4%) patients using both methods. In 3 patients (0.6%), the RBT was negative, while incomplete RAO was detected by DUSG. Superficial haematomas (˃ 5 but ≤10 cm) were found in 27 (5.4%) patients. There were no other local complications. Detection of radial artery patency and occlusion using the RBT and DUSG was comparable. The incidence of RAO in our study was extremely low. Thanks to its simplicity, the RBT has the potential to be used as the first method of detection of radial occlusion after coronary catheterizations.

Association of polymorphisms of platelet receptors GPIa (807C>T), GPVI (13254T>C), and P2Y12 (34C>T and H1/H2 haplotype) with increased risk of periprocedural bleeding in patients undergoing coronary angiography/percutaneous coronary intervention.

INTRODUCTION: Periprocedural bleeding related to coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with worse prognosis. Determining genetic variations associated with increased bleeding risk may help to identify high-risk patients. AIM: To analyse the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of crucial haemostatic platelet receptors (GPIa, GPVI, P2Y12) and the risk of periprocedural bleeding complications related to CAG/PCI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The population consisted of 73 patients with ischaemic heart disease who developed bleeding complications within 30 days after CAG/PCI and 331 patients without bleeding. The frequency of SNPs of GPIa 807C/T, GPVI 13254T/C, P2Y12 32C/T, and P2Y12 H1/H2 haplotype was analysed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) hybridization methods. RESULTS: The prevalence of variant alleles GPIa 807T, GPVI 13254C, P2Y12 34T, and P2Y12 H2 haplotype in the total study population was 56.7%, 20.3%, 56.2%, and 24.3%, respectively. The presence of variant alleles was not related to increased risk of periprocedural bleeding: GPIa 807C/T (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 0.75-2.24, p = 0.334), GPVI 12354T/C (OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.40-1.64, p = 0.551), P2Y12 34C/T (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.42-1.22, p = 0.189), P2Y12 H1/H2 haplotype (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.35-1.36, p = 0.258). The frequency of the homozygous form of P2Y12 H2 haplotype was higher in the group of patients who developed bleeding (OR = 2.79, 95% CI: 0.51-13.77, p = 0.161). CONCLUSIONS: No significant association of the SNPs of GPIa 807C/T, GPVI 13254T/C, P2Y12 32C/T, and P2Y12 H1/H2 haplotype with increased risk of periprocedural bleeding was found in patients with ischaemic heart disease undergoing CAG/PCI.

Access-site bleeding and radial artery occlusion in transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention: influence of adjunctive antiplatelet therapy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate access-site complications in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with a transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention relative to three different P2Y12 platelet inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 334 consecutive patients (76.9% men, age: 59.4±9.1 years) treated by one of the following: clopidogrel (n=118), prasugrel (n=102), and ticagrelor (n=114). The use of the IIb/IIIa inhibitor, abciximab, was left to the operators' discretion. The time needed to achieve patent hemostasis, compression time, and local complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were similar in all three P2Y12 platelet inhibitor groups. Abciximab was used in 72 (21.6%) patients. Administration of abciximab was associated with a higher incidence of grade II and III hematomas (23.6 vs. 5.0%, P<0.0001, and 5.6 vs. 1.1%, P=0.041, respectively). Among different platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitor groups, the incidences of hematomas grade II and III were similar in patients who did (P≥0.14) and did not (P≥0.31) receive abciximab. There were no grade IV or V hematomas in any of the groups. Patent hemostasis was achieved faster (24.5±13.4 vs. 43.5±30.0 min, P<0.0001) and compression time was shorter (113.2±53.6 vs. 217.8±115.5 min, P<0.0001) when abciximab was not used. Radial artery occlusion occurred in one (0.3%) patient. CONCLUSION: After transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention, early patent hemostasis and short artery compression times were associated with a higher incidence of local hematomas. The incidence of hematomas was dependent on the use of abciximab, but unrelated to the type of P2Y12 inhibitor used. All hematomas were without clinical consequences.

Number of severe bleeding complications according to classification used: Is unified classification of bleeding complications really necessary?

BACKGROUND: To compare the number of severe periprocedural bleeding complications from the total number of bleeding complications associated with diagnostic selective coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) when using different classifications (TIMI, GUSTO, PLATO, BARC) and to relate these classifications to real hemodynamic status of evaluated patients. METHODS: We analyzed data from 106 patients who underwent invasive procedure for ischemic heart disease (selective coronary angiography/PCI) and suffered from any type of bleeding complication. RESULTS: The number of bleeding according to impacts on hemodynamic status and consequent treatment shows that 54.7% of all bleedings did not need any specific therapy. Bleeding leading to death, hemorrhagic shock, hemodynamic instability, administration of blood transfusion, surgical procedure and local treatment occurred in 6.6%, 1.9%, 5.7%, 14.2%, 2.8%, and 14.2%, respectively. The results comparing bleeding classifications demonstrate that the rate of severe bleeding complications may increase up to 4 times when different classifications are used on the same group of patients (TIMI 9.4%, GUSTO 15.1%, PLATO 39.2% and BARC 35.9%). The power of association between severe bleeding determined by these classifications and real hemodynamic compromise using Kendall's tau-c correlation is -0.4106 (95% CI -0.599 to -0.222), -0.5355 (95% CI -0.718 to -0.353), -0.5513 (95% CI -0.729 to -0.374) and -0.7552 (95% CI -0.897 to -0.612) for TIMI, GUSTO, PLATO and BARC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The data show significant dependence of percentage of severe periprocedural bleeding complications on selected classification. The strongest association between severe bleeding and real hemodynamic status was found for BARC classification as this classification seems to be promising for future general use.

Early and late outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention by radial or femoral approach in patients presenting in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.

BACKGROUND: Although radial approach is increasingly used in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) including in acute myocardial infarction (MI), patients with cardiogenic shock have been excluded from comparisons with femoral approach. The aim of our study was to compare clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary PCI with cardiogenic shock by radial and femoral approach. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 2,663 patients presenting with ST-elevation MI in 2 large volume radial centers, we identified 197 patients (7.4%) with signs of cardiogenic shock immediately before undergoing primary PCI. Radial approach was used in 55% of cases when at least 1 radial artery was weakly palpable, either spontaneously or after intravenous noradrenaline bolus. Patients in the radial group were older (69 ± 12 vs 64 ± 12 years, P = .010), had less diabetes (13% vs 26%, P = .028), and required less often intubation prior PCI (42% vs 66%, P = .0006) or intraaortic balloon pump (36% vs 55%, P = .0096). Mortality at 1 year was 44% in the radial group and 64% in the femoral group (P = .0044). Independent predictors of late mortality included radial approach (hazard ratio [HR] 0.65, 95% CI 0.42-0.98, P = .041), the use of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa receptor inhibitors (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.40-0.96, P = .032), baseline creatinine ≥110 µmol/L (HR 3.34, 95% CI 2.20-5.12, P < .0001), initial glycemia >200 mg/dL (HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.34-3.11, P = .0008), and age >65 years (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.18-2.79, P = .006). CONCLUSION: Radial approach was safe and feasible in more than half of the patients with ST-elevation MI and cardiogenic shock treated by primary PCI. After adjustment for baseline and procedural characteristics, radial approach remained associated with better survival. However, prognosis of patients undergoing primary PCI in cardiogenic shock remains poor.