Assessing abdominal aortic calcifications before performing colocolic or colorectal anastomoses: A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative evaluation needs objective measurement of the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL). This study aimed to determine if cardiovascular disease, evaluated by abdominal aortic calcification (AAC), was associated with AL after colorectal anastomoses. We conducted a retrospective case-control study on patients who underwent colorectal anastomosis between 2012 and 2016 at Reims University Hospital (France). Abdominal aortic calcification was the main variable of measurement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed all patients who had a left-sided colocolic or a colorectal anastomosis, all patients with AL were cases; 2 controls, or 3 when possible, without AL were randomly selected and matched by operation type, pathology, and age. For multivariate analysis, 2 logistic regression models were tested, the first one used the calcification rate as a continuous variable and the second one used the calcification rate ≥ 5% as a qualitative variable. RESULTS: Forty-five cases and 116 controls were included. In univariate analysis, the calcification rate and the percentage of patients with a calcification rate ≥5% were significantly higher in cases than in control groups (4.4 ± 5.5% vs. 2.5 ± 5.2%, odds ratio [OR] =1.6 95% CI: 1.1-2.5; n = 22, 49% and n = 34.3 3%, OR = 2.8 95% CI: 1.2-6.2). In multivariate models, calcification rate as a continuous variable and calcification rate ≥5% as qualitative variable were independent significant risk factors for AL (respectively, aOR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1-3, P = 0.01; aOR = 3.2; 95% CI: 1.4-7.55, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: AAC ≥5% should alert on a higher risk of AL and should lead to discussion about the decision of performing an anastomosis.

Diagnostic contribution of a second percutaneous needle biopsy in patients with spontaneous diskitis and negative blood cultures and first biopsy.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to assess the diagnostic contribution of a second percutaneous needle biopsy in patients with spontaneous diskitis and negative findings from blood cultures and the first biopsy. We also assessed the sensitivity of the first biopsy and the diagnostic contribution of post-biopsy blood cultures. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study of patients managed between 2004 and 2014. We excluded patients with postoperative diskitis. RESULTS: We identified 63 patients with spontaneous diskitis, negative blood cultures, and at least one percutaneous needle biopsy during the study period. The first biopsy established the diagnosis in 33 (52%) patients. Of the 30 remaining patients, 10 (33%) had a second biopsy, which was positive in 6 (60%), and 20 (67%) received probabilistic antibiotic therapy. There were 8 positive blood cultures after the first biopsy but, among them, 7 occurred in biopsy-positive patients. Biopsy yield varied with the guidance method (needle guidance software or imaging by computed tomography and/or fluoroscopy) and operators. Antibiotic therapy within the 6months preceding the first biopsy was significantly associated with having a negative first biopsy (15/30 versus 7/33; odds ratio, 3.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-9.13; P<0.05). CONCLUSION: In our study, a second needle biopsy was useful, providing the bacteriological diagnosis in 60% of cases of spontaneous diskitis with negative findings from blood cultures and the first biopsy.

Detection of hepatic metastases from carcinoid tumor: prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

The purpose of our study was to prospectively compare unenhanced ultrasonography (US) to contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) in the detection of hepatic metastases from carcinoid tumor. Thirty patients with carcinoid tumor prospectively underwent US, CEUS, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Differences in sensitivity at US and CEUS were compared using a combination of the results of MR imaging, fine-needle biopsy, and follow-up imaging. Lesion conspicuity was assessed subjectively for US and CEUS. Seventeen patients had a total of 69 hepatic metastases. The addition of CEUS improved the detection of individual metastases from 47 (Se 68%; 95% CI: 57.0, 79.0) to 68 (Se 99%; 99% CI: 96.7, 100.0). Contrast enhancement improved the subjective conspicuity of metastases in 85% of patients. CEUS showed one more metastasis than did MRI in one patient, and MRI showed one more than did CEUS in one patient. CEUS is more sensitive than US in the detection of carcinoid liver metastases.