Prevalence of and factors associated with a treatment delay due to the COVID-19 pandemic in patients with gastrointestinal cancer in Europe.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have raised the issue of delayed cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the extent of delays and cancellations in cancer treatment, screening and diagnosis varied widely by geographic region and study design, highlighting the need for further research. METHODS: We used the Oncology Dynamics (OD) database featuring data from a cross-sectional, partially retrospective survey to analyze treatment delays in 30,171 GI cancer patients from five European countries (Germany, France, UK, Spain, and Italy). Risk factors for treatment delays were identified using multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Treatment delays were documented in 1342 (4.5%) of the study patients, with most patients having a delay of less than 3 months (3.2%). We observed decisive differences of treatment delay in relation to geographical, healthcare- and patient-related factors. Treatment delay was highest in France (6.7%) and Italy (6.5%) and lowest in Spain (1.9%, p < 0.001). 5.9% of patients treated at general hospitals but only 1.9% of those treated by office-based physicians experienced treatment delays (p < 0.001). Moreover, the difference between lines of therapy was highly significant and ranged from 7.2% for early-stage patients in primary therapy to 2.6% in advanced/metastatic cancer patients receiving 4th or later line therapy (p < 0.001). Finally, the proportion of cases with delayed treatments increased from 3.5% in asymptomatic patients (ECOG 0) to 9.9% in bedridden patients (ECOG IV, p < 0.001). Results were confirmed in multivariable logistic regression models. Our data highlight the problem of delayed treatment of tumor patients in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Identified risk factors for delayed treatment, such as poor general health or treatment in smaller hospitals, offer starting points for future concepts of "pandemic preparedness".

Antibiotic therapy is associated with an increased incidence of cancer.

PURPOSE: There is a growing body of evidence suggesting the decisive involvement of the human microbiome in cancer development. The consumption of antibiotics may fundamentally change the microbiome and thereby create a precancerous environment promoting cancer development and growth. However, clinical data on the association between the consumption of antibiotics and cancer incidence have remained inconclusive. In this study, we quantified the association between the intake of different antibiotics and various cancer entities among outpatients from Germany. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study based on the IQVIA Disease Analyzer database included 111,828 cancer patients and 111,828 non-cancer controls who were matched to cancer cases using propensity scores. Patients were categorized as non-users, low-consumption (up to 50th percentile), and high-consumption (above 50th percentile) users of antibiotics overall and for each antibiotic class. Multivariable logistic conditional regression models were used to study the association between antibiotic intake within 5 years prior to the index date (first cancer diagnosis for cases or randomly selected date for controls) and cancer incidence. RESULTS: The probability of cancer was significantly higher among patients with a history of antibiotic intake than in matched controls. Patients using penicillin or cephalosporins displayed a higher incidence of cancer, while the intake of tetracyclines and macrolides actually reduced the risk of cancer development slightly. A complex picture was observed in our cancer site-stratified analyses. Most notably, the consumption of penicillin was significantly and positively associated with cancer development in the respiratory organs only (low consumption OR: 1.33, 95% CI 1.20-1.47; high consumption OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.22-1.64) and cephalosporin consumption was significantly associated with respiratory organ cancer (low consumption OR: 1.32, 95% CI 1.17-1.48, high consumption OR: 1.47, 95% CI 1.29-1.66), breast cancer (high consumption OR: 1.40, 95% CI 1.25-1.56), and lymphoid and hematopoietic tissue cancer (high consumption OR: 1.50, 95% CI 1.35-1.66). CONCLUSION: Our data strongly support the hypothesis that the intake of antibiotics is positively associated with the risk of cancer development.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with a higher incidence of coeliac disease.

BACKGROUND: Recently the incidence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has risen to become the most frequent liver disease worldwide. NAFLD is not a disease limited to the liver, but rather represents a systemic inflammatory disease involving multiple organ systems. Previous studies have suggested an association between NAFLD and coeliac disease, another disease related to inflammation. As the available clinical data is scarce and at least partially contradictory, we aimed at investigating a potential association between NAFLD and celiac disease in outpatients in Germany. METHODS: Using the Disease Analyzer database featuring data on diagnoses, prescriptions and demographic variables for 7.49 million cases of patients followed in general practices in Germany, we matched a total of 57 336 patients with NAFLD/diagnosed between 2000 and 2015 to a cohort of equal size without NAFLD by age, sex and index year. Incidence of celiac disease was compared between groups within 10 years from the index date. RESULTS: During the 10-years observation period, we observed a higher incidence of coeliac disease in NAFLD patients compared to patients without NAFLD (11.2 vs. 7.5 cases per 100 000 patients' years). Interestingly, this association was most prominent in men (hazard ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.01-4.04) and patients between 18 and 50 years (hazard ratio, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.12-6.94). SUMMARY: Our data suggest that NAFLD promotes the development of coeliac disease particularly in young men. This finding argues that coeliac disease should be recognized as another nonliver-related complication of NAFLD and suggests screening of selected NAFLD patients for the presence of coeliac disease.