Determinants of change in code status among patients with cardiopulmonary arrest admitted to the intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiopulmonary arrest often have a poor prognosis, prompting discussion with families about code status. The impact of socioeconomic factors, demographics, medical comorbidities and medical interventions on code status changes is not well understood. METHODS: This retrospective study included adult patients presenting with cardiac arrest to the intensive care unit of a hospital group between 5/1/2010-5/1/2020. We extracted chart data on socioeconomic factors, demographics, and medical comorbidities. RESULTS: We identified 1,254 patients, of which 57.5% were males. Age was different across the groups with (61.2 ± 15.5 years) and without (61.2 ± 15.5 years) code status change (p= <0.0001). Code status was changed in 583 patients (46.5%). Among patients with code status change, the highest prevalence was White patients (34.8%), followed by African Americans (30.9%), and Hispanics (25.4%). Compared to patients who did not have a code status change, those with a change in code status were older (66.7 ± 14.8 years vs 61.2 ± 15.5 years). They were also more likely to receive vasopressor/inotropic support (74.6% vs 58.5%), and broad-spectrum antibiotics (70.3% vs 57.7%). Insurance status, ethnicity, religion, education, and salary did not lead to statistically significant changes in code status. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cardiopulmonary arrest, code status change was more likely to be influenced by the presence of medical comorbidities and medical interventions during hospitalization rather than by socioeconomic factors.

An Updated Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombus.

Left ventricular (LV) thrombus is a potentially serious complication affecting males and females with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy-specifically, after acute myocardial infarctions of the anterior left ventricular wall and long-standing tachyarrhythmias, respectively. LV thrombi pose significant risks for systemic embolization and devastating stroke events, while also demanding a treatment carrying inherent risks of its own. It is therefore imperative to have accurate detection of these ventricular thrombi and an appropriate understanding of the risks and benefits regarding management. Anticoagulation using warfarin has long been established as the gold-standard level of care in the current guidelines of the American College of Cardiology but the advent of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) prompts a re-examination of the literature. The particular question we seek to answer lies in the efficacy of these drugs and the safety and outcomes when used to treat LV thrombi. Recent case reports, meta-analyses, and most recently, the breakthrough of 2 novel randomized controlled trials have shown DOACs to be a promising treatment for LV thrombus. Contrarily, some retrospective cohort reviews suggest less-than-promising outcomes. This meta-analysis hopes to provide a current, curated review of up-to-date safety and efficacy in the documented tales of DOACs and LV thrombi that has been published since early 2020-by selecting these curated case studies, and analyzing the most recent randomized controlled trials, we hope to engage the reader with clearer illustrations of the key components of both the advocacy and warning of this pharmaceutical intervention.

The Cost-Effectiveness of Tocilizumab (Actemra) Therapy in Giant Cell Arteritis.

BACKGROUND: Tocilizumab (Actemra) is a humanized anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody that has been used as a steroid-sparing agent in giant cell arteritis (GCA). Although the clinical effects are well described in GCA, the cost-effectiveness of the use of tocilizumab in GCA is ill defined. The purpose of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of tocilizumab in GCA compared with prednisone alone. METHODS: A retrospective study of 32 patients with biopsy-proven GCA comparing prednisone alone (16 patients) and prednisone with tocilizumab (16 patients) was performed. The cost for tocilizumab therapy for 26 weeks with mild and severe side effects (Groups 1 and 2, respectively) and for 52 weeks with mild and severe side effects (Group 3 and 4, respectively) was compared with estimated costs of mild and severe steroid-induced side effects (Groups 5 and 6, respectively). Statistical analysis between groups was conducted using independent sample t tests. RESULTS: Three out of the 4 group combinations of tocilizumab with prednisone demonstrated a statistically significant (P < 0.05) difference in cost compared with prednisone alone for GCA. Group 2 (26-week tocilizumab therapy with severe steroid-induced side effects), with no statically significant difference in price when compared with steroid therapy alone and far fewer side effects, demonstrated the potential use of tocilizumab in GCA therapy. As expected, longer treatment duration with tocilizumab was associated with greater cost. With respect to side effect severity, the number of side effects of steroid therapy was inversely associated with difference in cost between tocilizumab therapy and steroid side effect treatment. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that combination therapy of tocilizumab and prednisone is significantly more expensive than steroids alone with or without accounting for the cost of steroid-induced side effects in treated GCA. The difference in cost between the 2 therapy types is directly related to tocilizumab therapy duration and inversely related to the number or severity of steroid side effects. Patients with GCA who require a shorter duration of steroid therapy and are at risk for a high number of side effects from steroid use may be potential candidates for tocilizumab therapy, from an economic perspective.