Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of periodontal and periapical disease.

OBJECTIVES: Early pre-clinical inflammatory changes in periodontal and/or periapical lesions, which typically precede bone loss, are challenging to diagnose using ionizing-radiation-based imaging modalities. MRI provides relevant additional diagnostic information of inflammatory processes in soft and hard tissues. The aim of the present study is to undertake a systematic review of the literature on MRI in the diagnosis of periodontal and/or periapical disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus bibliographic databases were searched (2000-2021) using the search string: ("MRI" or "magnetic resonance imaging") and ("periodontitis" or "periodontal" or "apical pathology" or "endodontic pathology" or "periapical" or "furcation" or "intrabony"). The search was limited to studies published in English. The studies were assessed independently by three reviewers, focusing on the MRI sequences, imaging modalities (radiographs, cone beam CT (CBCT), and MRI), disease definition, assessed parameters, and outcome measurements. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 34 studies, from which 13 were included. Overall, the findings of MRI were in agreement with CBCT. The studies showed that MRI provided diagnostic information of the hard and soft tissue components affected by periodontal and/or periapical disease with a fairly high sensitivity and specificity. However, the assessed parameters (e.g. MRI acquisition protocols, and disease definition) differed substantially. CONCLUSIONS: The included studies indicate that the use of MRI in the diagnosis of periodontal and/or periapical disease is feasible and promising. More studies are needed to define the accuracy of this non-ionizing-radiation-based diagnostic modality, in the assessment of periodontal and/or periapical lesions.

Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts caused by orthodontic appliances and/or implant-supported prosthesis: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Dental materials, including orthodontic appliances and implants, are commonly mentioned as a possible source of artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of the present study was to undertake a systematic review of the relevant literature on MR image artefacts due to dental materials, limited to orthodontic appliances and implant-supported dental prosthesis, on both technical and diagnostic levels. METHODS: The MEDLINE (PubMed) bibliographic database was searched up to September 2020. The search was limited to studies published in English, using the search string: (MRI or magnetic resonance) and (artefact or artifact) and (dental or ortho or implant or restoration or restorative). The studies were assessed independently by three reviewers, focusing on the following parameters: MRI sequences, tested materials, assessed parameters, efficacy level and outcome. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 31 studies, which were included in this systematic review. These studies showed that metallic dental materials, commonly present in orthodontic appliances and implant-supported dental prosthesis led to diverse types/severities of artefacts in MR images. Fifteen studies were in vivo, based on human subjects. The studies differed substantially in terms of tested materials, assessed parameters, and outcome measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Metallic dental materials cause artefacts of diverse types and severities in MR images of the head and neck region. However, the diagnostic relevance of the investigated artefacts for the diverse MRI applications is yet to be studied.