Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Surg Pathol ; 47(6): 701-708, 2023 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37057830

ABSTRACT

Anterior prostate cancer (APC) has been considered an indolent tumor, most commonly arising in the transition zone (TZ). More recently, detection of APC has been facilitated through multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and improved biopsy techniques, enabling earlier detection. The pathologic features and clinical significance of pure APC in a large contemporary series of well-characterized tumors have, to date, not been elucidated. Cases with APC defined as cancer present anterior to the urethra only were identified from 1761 consecutive radical prostatectomy specimens accessioned between January 2015 and August 2016. The clinicopathologic features of these cases were compared with those of pure posterior prostate cancer (PPC) and the features of anterior peripheral zone (APZ) cancers were compared with those of TZ cancers. In addition, the tumor series from 2015 to 2016 was compared with a cohort of 1054 patients accessioned before the utilization of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the routine workup of patients with prostate cancer. In the 2015-2016 series, there were 188 (10.7%) patients with APC compared with 5.4% in the series from the pre-multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging era. No difference was observed between APC and PPC with regards to patient age or mean serum prostate-specific antigen at presentation. Mean tumor volume and positive surgical margin (PSM) rates were significantly higher in APC. In contrast, PPC was more commonly high grade with more frequent extraprostatic extension (EPE). None of the cases of APC had infiltration of the seminal vesicle or lymph node involvement, in contrast to PPC, with almost 14% of cases in each category. The 3- and 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival was significantly higher in APC when compared with PPC, although this was not retained on multivariable analysis which included tumor location. On division of APCs according to anatomic zone of origin, 45% were APZ cancer and 37% TZ cancer. On comparison of APZ and TZ cancers, there were no significant differences in mean age and serum prostate-specific antigen at presentation as well as tumor volume, Gleason score, and PSM rate. High-grade malignancy (Gleason score >3 + 4=7) was seen in 26% of TZ cancers which compared with 44% of APZ cancers and 56% of PPC cancers. The rate of EPE was significantly higher in APZ when compared with TZ cancer ( P< 0.0005); however, the biochemical recurrence rate was not significantly different between the groups. The prevalence of APC in radical prostatectomy specimens has increased in recent times, in association with earlier detection at a stage amenable to curative surgical treatment. APC, when compared with PPC, is less commonly high grade with less frequent EPE, despite the APC group having larger tumors and a higher PSM rate at presentation. However, not all anterior cancers are indolent. Anterior cancers are more commonly seen in the APZ than the TZ and APZ cancers appear more locally aggressive than TZ cancers.


Subject(s)
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prostate/pathology , Prostatectomy/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging
3.
Am J Surg Pathol ; 45(11): 1527-1533, 2021 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34265803

ABSTRACT

High-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma involving duct/acinar structures is labeled intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDCP). As numerous studies have shown that IDCP is associated with high stage disease with a significant negative impact on cancer-specific survival, accurate diagnosis is crucial to ensure appropriate patient management. The definition of IDCP recommended by 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification suggests that cases of IDCP with micropapillary or loose cribriform architecture without comedonecrosis should have cells with ≥6× nuclear enlargement. It is unclear how this size criterion was derived and which of the parameters of nuclear size (nuclear diameter, nuclear surface area, or nuclear perimeter) it relates to. To evaluate the extent of nuclear enlargement in IDCP, we performed morphometric analyses relating to each of these parameters in 100 radical prostatectomy specimens. One hundred nuclei from foci of IDCP and 50 nuclei from foci of normal luminal epithelium were examined for each patient. Diagnosis of IDCP was based on cells with definite features of carcinoma present within duct/acinar structures. Comparing the means of each of the parameters between IDCP cells and benign luminal cells, there was a statistically significant enlargement in nuclear perimeter (P<0.0005), nuclear area (P<0.0005), and nuclear diameter (P<0.0005); however, the difference in mean nuclear size was limited to factors of 1.3×, 1.6×, and 1.3×, respectively. Three patients each had rare large nuclei (largest perimeter 45, 45, and 44 µm; maximum nuclear area 135, 136, and 136 µm2; and the largest diameter 18 µm in each). For these rare cells, the nuclear size difference, when compared with benign nuclei was; nuclear perimeter 2.0×, 2.1×, and 2.1×; nuclear area 3.6×, 3.8×, and 3.8×; and nuclear maximum diameter 3.0×, 2.5×, and 2.5×. The definition of nuclear enlargement of ≥6× was not reached in any of our cases, all of which clearly showed features of duct invasive carcinoma. In these cases, reliance on nuclear size criteria would have resulted in underdiagnosis of IDCP. This is of concern as failure to recognize IDCP, particularly in needle biopsies, could lead to delays in the timely treatment of aggressive high-grade prostate cancer, resulting in cancer progression and suboptimal patient oncological outcomes.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Ductal/pathology , Cell Nucleus Size , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy , Carcinoma, Ductal/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Predictive Value of Tests , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery
4.
Pathology ; 53(2): 199-204, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33386122

ABSTRACT

Grading is one of the best prognostic indicators of prostate cancer with Gleason grade 5 having the worst outcome. The prognostic influence of grade 5 patterns remains uncertain. A total of 646 prostate needle biopsy sets with Gleason score (GS) 9-10 prostatic adenocarcinoma were prospectively analysed. Patterns of grade 5 were correlated with radical prostatectomy (RP) adverse findings of high tumour volume (TV), extra-prostatic extension (EPE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) and lymph node involvement (LNI) in 472 and biochemical recurrence (BCR) in 338 patients after RP. Mean age and serum PSA were 69 years (range 37-91) and 26.1 ng/mL (range 1.4-1800), respectively. Gleason scores were 4+5=9 in 539 (83%), 5+4=9 in 94 (15%) and 5+5=10 in 13 cases (2%). Clusters/cords, single cells, sheets and comedocarcinoma were found in 86%, 69%, 26% and 18% with a pure pattern in 25% of cases. Comparing cases with and without sheets, there were no significant differences with RP high TV (p=0.8577), EPE (p=0.5372), SVI (p=0.5183) and LNI (p=0.4323). However, the presence of sheets predicted a significantly higher BCR rate (p=0.0033), while for tumours with single cells, the interval to BCR was significantly shorter (p<0.0001). Comparing cases with and without the other patterns, two other significant differences were found. Comedocarcinoma predicted high TV (p=0.0230) and single cells predicted EPE (p=0.0101). This study shows that all patterns currently used to assign a Gleason grade 5, including sheets, comedocarcinoma, single cells and clusters/cords, are associated with aggressive outcomes validating their inclusion in grade 5.


Subject(s)
Neoplasm Grading , Prognosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy, Needle , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostate/pathology , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Seminal Vesicles/pathology
5.
Histopathology ; 71(4): 641-647, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28590015

ABSTRACT

AIM: The clinical significance of mucinous prostatic adenocarcinoma (PCa) remains uncertain. METHODS: From 6440 cases of PCa treated by radical prostatectomy from 2009 to 2014, mucinous components of 5-100% were found in 143 (2.2%) cases. RESULTS: The mean age was 61.4 years, mean pre-operative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 7.8 ng/ml and clinical stage category was cT1 in 81% and cT2 in 19% of cases. Cases were graded using the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology recommendation of grading underlying architecture, and Gleason scores (GS) were 3 + 4 in 13.3%, 4 + 3 in 54.5%, 4 + 4 in 2.1%, 3 + 4 or 4 + 3 with tertiary 5 in 11.9% and 9-10 in 18.2%. The mucinous component invariably had a high-grade component. Extraprostatic extension was found in 46.8% of cases. In 21.6%, tumour volume was ≥3 cm³ and 9.7% had surgical margin positivity. Seminal vesicle involvement was found in 6.9%. In 73 cases the mucinous component was >25%, and when cases were divided on the basis of the area of mucin present (≤25 versus >25%) there was no significant difference between clinical or pathological features. Similar findings were achieved when cases were compared with grade-matched non-mucinous carcinoma controls. The 5-year biochemical recurrence rates for mucinous versus non-mucinous cancer were 12.5 versus 17% (P = 0.15). CONCLUSION: PCa with mucinous components is often high grade; however, the prognosis appears to be similar to non-mucinous cancers of similar GS.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/pathology , Carcinoma, Acinar Cell/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Acinar Cell/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Prognosis , Prostate/pathology , Prostate-Specific Antigen/metabolism , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Seminal Vesicles/pathology
6.
Pathology ; 47(6): 515-9, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26325670

ABSTRACT

The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) modified Gleason grading system was further amended in 2014 with the establishment of grade groupings (ISUP grading). This study examined the predictive value of ISUP grading, comparing results with recognised prognostic parameters.Of 3700 men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) reported at Aquesta Pathology between 2008 and 2013, 2079 also had a positive needle biopsy available for review. We examined the association between needle biopsy 2014 ISUP grade and 2005 modified Gleason score, tumour volume, pathological stage of the subsequent RP tumour, as well as biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS). The median age was 62 (range 32-79 years). Median serum prostate specific antigen was 5.9 (range 0.4-69 ng/mL). For needle biopsies, 280 (13.5%), 1031 (49.6%), 366 (17.6%), 77 (3.7%) and 325 (15.6%) were 2014 ISUP grades 1-5, respectively. Needle biopsy 2014 ISUP grade showed a significant association with RP tumour volume (p < 0.001), TNM pT and N stage (p < 0.001) and BRFS (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards regression model showed serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) at the time of diagnosis and ISUP grade >2 to be significantly associated with BRFS.This study provides evidence of the prognostic significance of ISUP grading for thin core needle biopsy of prostate.


Subject(s)
Neoplasm Grading , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle , Consensus Development Conferences as Topic , Disease-Free Survival , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading/methods , Neoplasm Grading/standards , Pathology, Clinical/standards , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Societies, Medical , Urology/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...