Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Indian J Med Ethics ; 4(3): 251-252, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31213417

ABSTRACT

Response of the authors to the Letter "Concerns with regard to an article" published online on April 5, 2019 (DOI: 10.20529/IJME.2019.014) on the IJME website.


Subject(s)
Referral and Consultation , Research , Humans , India
2.
Indian J Med Ethics ; 4(3): 234-237, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31213425

ABSTRACT

The Controlled Human Infection Model or CHIM, sometimes described as a human challenge study, is a relatively specialised medical research technique. Researchers infect healthy participants with a weakened strain of a pathogen in a controlled setting, in order to learn more about the infection and the disease, or to develop new vaccines for that disease. Unlike in other human clinical trials, where participants face a risk of harm because of, for example, the drug's side effects, healthy participants in CHIM trials are deliberately harmed through infection - contrary to every principle and guideline of medical practice and research.


Subject(s)
Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic/ethics , Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Ethics, Research , Human Experimentation/ethics , Research Subjects , Humans , India , Infection Control , Infections/therapy , Public Health , Public Opinion , Stakeholder Participation
3.
Indian J Med Ethics ; 3(4): 292-296, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30683640

ABSTRACT

In recent times there has been an emerging interest in conducting Controlled Human Infection Model studies in low-and-middle-income countries, in which healthy human beings are infected with weakened pathogen strains under controlled conditions. These volunteers are monitored closely so that cures and prevention methods can be developed for the disease. Such studies call into question the legal sophistry of taking consent to harm a person by justifying it for the greater good or advancement of science. This paper analyses the law on the subject and the ethics of obtaining consent to harm another human being as in the context of Controlled Human Infection Models.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/ethics , Biomedical Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Developing Countries , Informed Consent , Research Design , Ethics, Research , Humans , Volunteers
4.
Indian J Med Ethics ; 2(2): 72-74, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28512071

ABSTRACT

Vaccines and vaccination have emerged as key medical scientific tools for prevention of certain diseases. Documentation of the history of vaccination shows that the initial popular resistance to universal vaccination was based on false assumptions and eventually gave way to acceptance of vaccines and trust in their ability to save lives. The successes of the global eradication of smallpox, and now of polio, have only strengthened the premier position occupied by vaccines in disease prevention. However, the success of vaccines and public trust in their ability to eradicate disease are now under challenge, as increasing numbers of people refuse vaccination, questioning the effectiveness of vaccines and the need to vaccinate.


Subject(s)
Health Policy , Poliomyelitis/prevention & control , Public Health/ethics , Vaccination/ethics , Vaccines/therapeutic use , Humans , India
5.
Indian J Med Ethics ; 2(2): 88-93, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28512073

ABSTRACT

Vaccines are a widely accepted public health intervention. They are also a profitable tool for pharmaceutical companies manufacturing vaccines. There are many vaccines in the pipeline, for various diseases, or as combination vaccines for several diseases. However, there is also a growing concern about vaccines and the manner in which they are developed and approved by the authorities. Approvals are fast tracked and adverse events and serious adverse events following vaccination are seldom reported once the vaccine gets its marketing approval. Thus, vaccines have been clouded with many controversies and their use as a public health tool to prevent diseases is constantly under challenge.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/ethics , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/legislation & jurisprudence , Vaccination/ethics , Vaccination/standards , Vaccines/standards , Humans , India
6.
Indian J Med Ethics ; 2(3): 180-183, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28279947

ABSTRACT

While granting a prisoner the right to abort her foetus, a recent Bombay High Court judgment recognised a woman's absolute right to abortion. This article discusses the judgment in detail and the bioethical debates over abortion rights. It deals with the restrictions imposed by the law not only on when the foetus can be aborted, but also who can get the abortion done and in what circumstances.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced/legislation & jurisprudence , Abortion, Legal/legislation & jurisprudence , Bioethical Issues , Government Regulation , Legislation, Medical , Reproductive Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Women's Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Abortion, Induced/ethics , Abortion, Legal/ethics , Dissent and Disputes , Female , Fetus , Humans , India , Judgment , Pregnancy , Prisons , Reproductive Rights/ethics , Women's Rights/ethics
7.
Indian J Med Ethics ; 1(3): 134-7, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27474692

ABSTRACT

In early May 2016, reports of a bizarre study to attempt a reversal of brain death made the headlines, but there was not even a squeak from the authorities. The "Reanima Project" is a collaboration between an Indian surgeon, Himanshu Bansal, and a US-based biotech company, Bioquark Inc. The research will be conducted by Bansal's own biotech company, Revita Life Sciences, at his Anupam hospital in Rudrapur, a city in Uttarakhand state.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/ethics , Brain Death , Ethics, Medical , Ethics, Research , Hospitals/ethics , Scientific Misconduct/legislation & jurisprudence , Biomedical Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Biotechnology/ethics , Humans , India , United States
8.
9.
Indian J Med Ethics ; 12(3): 126-9, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26228043

ABSTRACT

In April 2015, the Union Cabinet approved the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Bill, 2014, which proposes to bring about regressive changes in the law, that would not only be unconstitutional but also unethical. In May 2015, the Ministry of Women and Child Development introduced the Bill in the Lok Sabha, where it was passed. If the Rajya Sabha, passes the Bill and the President gives his assent to it, the youth of this country will be harmed in a manner that could break the very fabric of the nation.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Behavior , Crime/legislation & jurisprudence , Criminal Behavior , Criminal Law/ethics , Government Regulation , Adolescent , Adolescent Development , Age Factors , Child , Child Welfare , Humans , India , Morals , Trust
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...