ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Evidence for the effectiveness of intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment (IIPT) for pediatric chronic pain is growing; however, little research has considered factors that contribute to differences in patients' treatment response. The present study utilized multilevel modeling to examine trajectory of change over time in functional disability from clinic assessment to 6-month follow-up in pediatric patients participating in IIPT, considering spatial distribution of pain, coping efficacy, and pain intensity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants included 110 pediatric patients (Mage=14.65, SD=2.37; localized pain, 27.3%; widespread pain, 72.7%) consecutively admitted into IIPT. Patients completed self-report measures of functional disability, pain intensity, and coping efficacy at pretreatment assessment, admission, weekly during IIPT, discharge, and several follow-ups. RESULTS: Analysis identified a model with 3 three-way interactions, including time, time squared, pain intensity, coping efficacy, and pain distribution, on functional disability. The spatial distribution of pain had the greatest impact on treatment trajectory in patients with widespread pain, high pain intensity, and poor coping efficacy; these patients demonstrated greater functional disability compared with patients with localized pain. In addition, patients with widespread pain and poor coping efficacy had the most functional disability across all levels of pain intensity. Patients with localized pain and poor coping efficacy demonstrated initial treatment gains, but evidenced an increase in functional disability at follow-up. DISCUSSION: Overall, spatial distribution of pain, coping efficacy, and pain intensity played an important role in patients' response to treatment. Better understanding of these variables could improve treatment response, particularly for the most severely disabled chronic pain patients.
Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Chronic Pain , Disabled Persons , Pain Management , Child , Chronic Pain/therapy , Humans , Pain MeasurementABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Adequate sagittal plane motion of the first metatarsalphalangeal joint (1st MTPJ) is important during normal gait and goniometric measurement is commonly used as a diagnostic and outcome assessment tool. We aimed to determine the intra and inter-rater reliability together with the concurrent validity of a universal plastic goniometer (UG) and a smartphone applicationlication (Dr G) for the measurement of dorsiflexion at the 1st MTPJ. METHODS: Measurement of joint position and passive range of motion of the 1st MTPJ dorsiflexion was compared using a UG and DrG goniometer. A double-blind repeated measures design was utilized, with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) used to determine levels of reliability. RESULTS: For joint position good intra-rater reliability (ICC >0.861) and good inter-rater reliability (ICC >0.823) was noted. However, the Dr G application consistently measured lower angles (mean 27.8° (SD 8.37)) than the UG (mean 32° (SD 11.7)) and these associations were significant (r = 0.399, p < 0.001). For passive range of motion, the mean total range of dorsiflexion motion (from maximum plantarflexed position to maximum dorsiflexed position) was 82.8° (SD 12.2) for the UG and 82.9° (SD 11.3) for the Dr G application. Both instruments demonstrated high levels of intra-rater reliability (ICC >0.809). Inter-rater reliability was moderate to good for the UG (ICC 0.693 (95 % CI 0.580 to 0.788)) and good for the Dr G application (ICC 0.708 (95 % CI 0.597 to 0.799)). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate to high intra and inter-rater reliability of joint position and passive 1st MTPJ motion can be achieved with traditional and smartphone-based goniometric measurement. The Dr G application may provide a slightly higher reliability, but devices should not be used inter-changeably as significant variation in measurement between devices may occur.
