Excessive aortic inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an 18F-FDG PET pilot study.

UNLABELLED: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients exhibit increased cardiovascular risk, even after controlling for smoking. Inflammation may underlie this observation. METHODS: We measured vascular inflammation in both COPD patients and controls using (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Aortic inflammation was expressed as the target-to-background ratio (TBR) of the standardized uptake value in 7 COPD patients, 5 metabolic syndrome patients, and 7 ex-smokers. RESULTS: Abdominal aortic mean TBR (+/-SD) was greater in COPD patients than in ex-smoker controls (1.60 +/- 0.13 vs. 1.34 +/- 0.15, P = 0.0001). Aortic arch and abdominal aorta mean TBRs were higher in metabolic syndrome patients than in COPD patients (aortic arch, 1.80 +/- 0.18 vs. 1.53 +/- 0.18, P = 0.001, and abdominal aorta, 1.71 +/- 0.14 vs. 1.60 +/- 0.13, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: COPD patients exhibited aortic inflammation that fell between the aortic inflammation exhibited by ex-smokers and that by metabolic syndrome patients. This may in part explain the increased risk of cardiovascular disease in COPD patients.

Single or triple dose piperacillin prophylaxis in elective cesarean section.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of piperacillin in the prevention of perioperative febrile morbidity in elective cesarean sections, a combination of cephradine plus metronidazole vs. a control group which did not receive any antibiotic prophylaxis. METHOD: 198 women undergoing elective cesarean section were included in a randomized control study to compare the prophylactic efficacy and safety of a single dose (4 g) or three doses (2 g) of piperacillin, three doses of cephradine plus metronidazole combination, when administered peri-operatively and a control group which did not receive prophylactic antibiotics. RESULT: 198 women were randomized to the study, but 14 had to be excluded leaving 184 for analysis. Statistically significant difference was reached when comparing the piperacillin groups (group A and group C) with control (group D) in the prevention of postoperative febrile morbidity inclusive of wound infection and endomyometritis (single-dose piperacillin group A: Relative Risk = 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.58). Multi-dose piperacillin therapy group C: R.R. = 0.27, 95% CI 0.10-0.77). The combination of cephradine and metronidazole (group B) when compared with the control group did not show any statistical significant difference in prevention of postoperative febrile morbidity (R.R.= 0.49, 95% CI 0.22-1.10). Single-dose piperacillin when compared to multi-dose piperacillin regimen appears to be more effective at reducing postoperative infective morbidity but this is not statistically significant (R.R. = 0.51, 95% CI 0.10-2.65). When febrile morbidity is separated into wound infection and myometritis, the reduction rates in either of them in each antibiotic study group A, B and C compared to the control group D are not significant except when study groups A and C are combined and compared to control group D (R.R. = 0.21, 95% CI 0.76-0.06). CONCLUSION: Piperacillin single agent therapy, either as a single dose of 4 g or a triple dose of 2 g, is effective and safe in the prevention of postoperative infection when given as prophylaxis in elective cesarean cases.

Controlled cord traction versus minimal intervention techniques in delivery of the placenta: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to compare the controlled cord traction technique with the minimal intervention technique for delivery of the placenta. The primary outcome was the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage. Secondary outcomes included duration of third stage of labor, frequency of retained placenta, hemorrhagic shock, the need for blood transfusion, and the need for uterotonic agents to control postpartum hemorrhage. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1648 women who were delivered vaginally were randomly allocated during labor to the controlled cord traction group (n = 827) or the minimal intervention group (n = 821). In the controlled cord traction group women received oxytocin, 10 units intramuscularly, with delivery of the baby's anterior shoulder, after which the placenta was delivered actively by controlled cord traction (Brandt-Andrews method). In the minimal intervention group the placenta was delivered by maternal pushing. Continuous intravenous oxytocin was given after delivery of the placenta. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each variable. RESULTS: The overall incidence of postpartum hemorrhage was significantly lower in the controlled cord traction group (5.8% vs 11%; odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 0.73). The incidence of retained placenta (> or = 30 minutes) was 1.6% in the controlled cord traction group and 4.5% in the minimal intervention group (odds ratio 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.63). Significantly more patients in the minimal intervention group required additional uterotonic agents to control hemorrhage (5.1% vs 2.3%; odds ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.24 to 0.78). CONCLUSION: The controlled cord traction technique for delivery of the placenta results in a significantly lower incidence of postpartum hemorrhage and retained placenta, as well as less need for uterotonic agents, compared with the minimal intervention technique.

Abu Dhabi third stage trial: oxytocin versus Syntometrine in the active management of the third stage of labour.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of oxytocin and Syntometrine when used as part of active management of third stage of labour on postpartum haemorrhage, hypertension, nausea/vomiting and retained placenta. STUDY DESIGN: A randomised double blind trial was conducted in the Obstetric Unit of Corniche Hospital, Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates. Between 1 January 1991 and 30 June 1991, 2040 women were randomly allocated either to the oxytocin (n = 1017) or the Syntometrine (n = 1023) group. Twelve patients had to be excluded from the trial (oxytocin, 5; Syntometrine, 7) after randomisation because they no longer fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All women in the trial received either oxytocin 10 units or Syntometrine 1 ml (oxytocin 5 units+ergometrine (ergonovine) 0.5 mg) by intramuscular injection with delivery of the anterior shoulder of the baby. Relative risk with 95% confidence intervals was calculated for each variable. RESULTS: Oxytocin (10 units) alone was as effective as Syntometrine (1 ml) in preventing post-partum haemorrhage without an increase in the incidence of retained placenta. Median blood loss was similar in both groups. The incidences of nausea, vomiting and headache were significantly lower in the oxytocin group, as was the occurrence of a mean rise in diastolic and systolic blood pressures of 20 and 30 mmHg or more, respectively. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic administration of oxytocin 10 U in the third stage of labour, as part of active management, reduces the incidence of maternal nausea, vomiting, headache and rise in blood pressure than does Syntometrine 1 ml without adversely affecting the rate of post partum haemorrhage.