Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Seizure ; 102: 51-53, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36191475

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study assesses investigations, referrals and admissions in patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with seizures, and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on such management. Outcomes in patients with learning disabilities, active significant mental health concerns, and from the most socioeconomically deprived areas were compared to those of the general cohort. METHODS: Investigations, referrals and admissions were recorded for 120 patients across two cohorts; pre-pandemic (September 2019) and during the pandemic (December 2020). Retrospective review of individual patient electronic health care records was used for data collection. RESULTS: There was a decrease in patient numbers from 2019 to 2020. A greater proportion of patients presented with organic cause seizures and fewer presented with non-epileptic attacks. Frequent use of CT heads (45%) is likely to represent improper use of limited resources. There were low referral rates, both to acute neurology (28%) and to the adult epilepsy team (32%). Patients with active significant mental health concerns were significantly less likely to be referred to neurology or admitted. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a greater proportion of admissions during the Covid-19 pandemic, referrals to acute neurology and the epilepsy team remained low. Failure to refer prevents the most vulnerable seizure patients from receiving appropriate support, as seen in patients with active significant mental health concerns. Neurology staff were unaware of a significant number of patients presenting with seizures, which is of concern in an already over-stretched department. This offers an opportunity to improve care for people with epilepsy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsy , Adult , Humans , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Seizures/diagnosis , Seizures/epidemiology , Seizures/therapy , Epilepsy/diagnosis , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Epilepsy/therapy , Hospitals , Emergency Service, Hospital , Retrospective Studies
2.
Seizure ; 65: 98-100, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30660000

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Healthcare organisations in the UK primarily measure clinical activity from data collected on numbers of attendances at outpatient clinics, inpatient admissions and procedures performed etc. Telephone contacts with patients are not typically measured as clinical activity. This service evaluation examines the utility and value of the Epilepsy Specialist Nurse (ESN) within an innovative 'Open Access Model', giving a breakdown of clinical workload and outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective service evaluation analysing all patient encounters made by the ESN and their outcomes, over a 3-month period from the 01/02/2017 to 30/04/2017. RESULTS: During the 3-month data collection period there were 620 patient encounters with 251 different patients. Nurse-led clinic appointments and telephone calls were the two most common types of encounter. Eighteen percent of ESN time was spent on the phone directly addressing patient concerns (368 encounters). Of these calls, 72% led to prevention of a clinic appointment (268 appointments avoided) while only 22% needed a subsequent clinic appointment. The most common outcome of telephone encounters was 'medication management' (25%). CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation demonstrates that timely intervention by telephone reduces the need for outpatient appointments and leads to treatment changes being implemented quickly to address individual need.


Subject(s)
Epilepsy/nursing , Nurse Clinicians/psychology , Referral and Consultation , Access to Information , Delivery of Health Care , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Telephone
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...