ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVESTo determine whether population-level implementation of a test-and- treat approach to correction of sub-optimal vitamin D status (25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] <75 nmol/L) influences risk of all-cause acute respiratory infection (ARI) or coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). DESIGNPhase 3 open-label randomised controlled trial (CORONAVIT) utilising trials-within-cohorts (TwiCs) methodology. SETTINGUnited Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS6200 adults aged 16 years or older, who were not already taking vitamin D supplements at baseline. INTERVENTIONSOffer of a postal finger-prick test of blood 25(OH)D concentration with provision of a 6-month supply of higher-dose vitamin D (3200 IU/day, n=1550) or lower-dose vitamin D (800 IU/day, n=1550) to those with blood 25(OH)D concentration <75 nmol/L, vs. no offer of testing or supplementation (n=3100). Follow-up was from 17th December 2020 to 16th June 2021. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESThe primary outcome was the proportion of participants experiencing at least one doctor- or swab test-confirmed ARI of any cause. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of participants developing swab test-confirmed COVID-19. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios and associated 95% confidence intervals. RESULTSOf 3100 participants offered 25(OH)D testing, 2958 (95.4%) accepted, and 2690 (86.8%) had 25(OH)D <75 nmol/L and were sent vitamin D supplements (1356 higher-dose, 1334 lower-dose). 76 (5.0%) vs. 87 (5.7%) vs. 136 (4.6%) participants in higher-dose vs. lower-dose vs. no offer groups experienced at least one ARI of any cause (odds ratio [OR] for higher-dose vs. no offer 1.09, 95% CI 0.82-1.46; lower-dose vs. no offer 1.26, 0.96-1.66). 45 (3.0%) vs. 55 (3.6%) vs. 78 (2.6%) participants in higher-dose vs. lower-dose vs. no offer groups developed COVID-19 (OR for higher-dose vs. no offer 1.13, 0.78-1.63; lower-dose vs. no offer 1.39, 0.98-1.97). CONCLUSIONSAmong adults with a high baseline prevalence of sub-optimal vitamin D status, implementation of a population-level test-and-treat approach to vitamin D replacement did not reduce risk of all-cause ARI or COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT04579640 SUMMARY BOXO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topic?C_ST_ABSVitamin D metabolites support innate immune responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and other respiratory pathogens. Sub-optimal vitamin D status (25-hydroxyvitamin D <75 nmol/L) associates with increased susceptibility to all-cause acute respiratory infections (ARI) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Phase 3 randomised controlled trials of vitamin D to prevent COVID-19 have not yet reported. What this study addsThis phase 3 randomised controlled trial, including 6200 participants, shows that implementation of a population-level test-and-treat approach to oral vitamin D replacement at a dose of 800 IU or 3200 IU per day did not reduce risk of all-cause ARI or COVID-19 among adults with a high baseline prevalence of sub-optimal vitamin D status.
ABSTRACT
RationaleHigh galectin-3 levels predict poor outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Galectin-3 activates monocytes and macrophages which are directly implicated in COVID-19 immunopathology and the cytokine storm. GB0139 is a potent thiodigalactoside galectin-3 inhibitor and may reduce the severe effects of the disease. We report safety and pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the inhaled galectin-3 inhibitor, GB0139, and assess clinical outcomes and key systemic inflammatory biomarkers in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (ClinicalTrials.gov/EudraCT identifier: NCT04473053/2020-002230-32). MethodsAdults with COVID-19 requiring oxygen, and with pneumonitis on x-ray, were randomised to receive standard of care (SOC; including dexamethasone; n=21) or SOC plus 10 mg GB0139 twice daily for 48 hours, then once daily for [≤]14 days (n=20). ResultsPatients aged 27-87 years were enrolled from July 2020; the final patient completed the 90-day follow-up in April 2021. GB0139+SOC was well tolerated with no treatment-related serious adverse events reported. Incidences of adverse events were similar between treatment arms (40 with GB0139+SOC vs 35 with SOC). Plasma GB0139 was measurable in all patients after inhaled exposure, with moderate interpatient variability, and demonstrated target engagement with decreased circulating galectin (overall treatment effect post-hoc over days 2-7: p=0{middle dot}0099 vs SOC). Rate of decline in fraction of inspired oxygen (%) requirement was significantly greater in the GB0139+SOC arm with a posterior mean difference of -1{middle dot}51 (95% highest posterior density: -2{middle dot}90, -0{middle dot}189) versus SOC. Plasma levels of biomarkers associated with inflammation, coagulopathy, major organ function and fibrosis showed a downward trend versus SOC. ConclusionsGB0139+SOC was well tolerated and achieved clinically relevant plasma concentrations and target engagement. This, and the reduction in markers associated with inflammatory, coagulation, fibrosis, and reduction in inspired oxygen (%) over SOC alone, indicates the therapeutic potential for inhaled GB0139 in hospitalised patients with COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Despite the success of vaccines and selected repurposed treatments, COVID-19 is likely to remain a global health problem and further chemotherapeutics are required. Many repurposed drugs have progressed rapidly to Phase 2 and 3 trials without characterisation of Pharmacokinetics (PK)/Pharmacodynamics (PD) including safety in COVID-19. One such drug is Nafamostat Mesylate (Nafamostat), a synthetic serine protease inhibitor with anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory properties. Preclinical data has demonstrated that it is has potent antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 by directly inhibiting the transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) dependent stage of host cell entry. MethodsWe present the findings of a phase Ib/II open label, platform randomised controlled trial (RCT), exploring the safety of intravenous Nafamostat in hospitalised patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonitis. Patients were assigned randomly to standard of care (SoC), Nafamostat or an alternative therapy. Secondary endpoints included clinical endpoints such as number of oxygen free days and clinical improvement/ deterioration, PK/PD, thromboelastometry, D Dimers, cytokines, immune cell flow cytometry and viral load. ResultsData is reported from 42 patients, 21 of which were randomly assigned to receive intravenous Nafamostat. The Nafamostat group developed significantly higher plasma creatinine levels, more adverse events and a lower number of oxygen free days. There were no other statistically significant differences in the primary or secondary endpoints between Nafamostat and SoC. PK data demonstrated that intravenous Nafamostat was rapidly broken down to inactive metabolites. We observed an antifibrinolytic profile, and no significant anticoagulant effects in thromboelastometry. Participants in the Nafamostat group had higher D Dimers compared to SoC. There were no differences in cytokine profile and immune cell phenotype and viral loads between the groups. ConclusionIn hospitalised patients with COVID-19, we did not observe evidence of anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant or antiviral activity with intravenous Nafamostat. Given the number of negative trials with repurposed drugs, our experimental medicine trial highlights the value of PK/PD studies prior to selecting drugs for efficacy trials. Given the mechanism of action, further evaluation of Nafamostat delivered via a different route may be warranted. This trial demonstrates the importance of experimental trials in new disease entities such as COVID-19 prior to selecting drugs for larger trials.
ABSTRACT
IntroductionCOVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) is a new viral-induced pneumonia caused by infection with a novel coronavirus, SARS CoV2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2). At present there are few proven effective treatments. This early phase experimental medicine protocol describes an overarching and adaptive trial designed to provide safety, pharmacokinetic (PK)/ pharmacodynamic (PD) information and exploratory biological surrogates of efficacy, which may support further development and deployment of candidate therapies in larger scale trials of COVID-19 positive patients. Methods and analysisDEFINE is an ongoing exploratory multicentre platform, open label, randomised study. COVID-19 positive patients will be recruited from the following cohorts; a) community cases b) hospitalised patients with new changes on a chest x-ray (CXR) or a computed tomography (CT) scan or requiring supplemental oxygen and c) hospitalised patients requiring assisted ventilation. Participants may be recruited from all three of these cohorts, depending on the experimental therapy, its route of administration and mechanism of action. The primary statistical analyses are concerned with the safety of candidate agents as add-on therapy to standard of care in patients with COVID-19. Safety will be assessed usingO_LIHaematological and biochemical safety laboratory investigations. C_LIO_LIPhysical examination C_LIO_LIVital signs (blood pressure/heart rate/temperature and respiratory rate) C_LIO_LIDaily electrocardiogram (ECG) readings C_LIO_LIAdverse events C_LI The analysis population will consist of (i) all patients randomised to a treatment arm who receive any dose of the study drug and (ii) all patients randomised to the control arm who would also have been eligible to receive a study drug. Secondary analysis will assess the following variables during treatment period 1) the response of key exploratory biomarkers 2) change in WHO ordinal scale and NEWS2 score 3) oxygen requirements 4) viral load 5) duration of hospital stay 6) PK/PD and 7) changes in key coagulation pathways. Ethics and disseminationThe DEFINE trial platform and its initial two treatment and standard of care arms have received full ethical approval from Scotland A REC (20/SS/0066), the MHRA (EudraCT 2020-002230-32) and NHS Lothian and NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde. The results of each study arm will be published as soon as the treatment arm has finished recruitment, data input is complete and any outstanding patient safety follow-ups have been completed. Depending on the results of these or future arms, data will be shared with larger clinical trial networks, including RECOVERY, and to other partners for rapid roll out in larger patient cohorts. Registration detailsThe DEFINE protocol has been registered on ISRCTN (https://www.isrctn.com/) and Clinicaltrials.gov(https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04473053 ISRCTN Identifier: ISRCTN14212905 Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LIThe trial is as flexible as possible to ensure a broad range of patients can be recruited and candidate therapies can be added or removed as evidence emerges. C_LIO_LIThe team are collecting real world data of medications at an early stage of their use in COVID-19 across the full spectrum of disease; allowing the administration of different treatment formulations (inhaled vs oral vs intravenous). C_LIO_LIThe simultaneous collection of clinical outcomes as well as exploratory endpoints including clinical biomarkers, flow cytometry, PK/PD and thromboelastography allows further characterisation and elucidation of the temporal immuno-inflammatory cascade in COVID-19 to inform on future therapy selection. C_LIO_LIThis is a Phase 1b/IIa platform study and thus the primary end point is clinical safety therefore our anticipated numbers will be too small to allow for definitive data on efficacy. C_LIO_LIDEFINE is an experimental medicine platform, currently restricted to three clinical sites and so the generation of data will be slower than that of larger platforms with access to a greater number of patients. C_LI
