Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Placenta ; 121: 53-60, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35278842

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), a condition characterised by intermittent hypoxia and reoxygenation during sleep, is associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes including gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. The biological mechanisms of these associations are poorly understood. The impact of OSA on placental function has not been well characterised. METHODS: We performed 3' mRNA sequencing on placenta from women with obesity and OSA (n = 11) and women with obesity and no OSA (n = 9). RESULTS: After correcting for multiple testing, there were no statistically significant differences in gene expression between OSA and no OSA groups (adjusted p < 0.05). In unadjusted analyses, 101 genes were differentially expressed in OSA compared to no OSA placentae (p < 0.01). In Reactome pathway and GO term analysis, this included downregulation of genes involved in O-linked glycosylation (B3GNT5 and B3GNT8) and Wnt signalling (TRABD2B and FRZB) pathways. In gene set enrichment analysis, genes within 24 pathways had a non-random distribution in OSA compared to no OSA placentae (adjusted p < 0.05). This included an increase in genes relating to the reversible hydration of carbon dioxide in OSA placentae, a potential novel mechanism contributing to the development of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with OSA. DISCUSSION: There is overall similarity in the placental transcriptome of women with obesity who do and do not have OSA during pregnancy. Alterations in the reversible hydration of carbon dioxide are a potential mechanism contributing to the development of adverse pregnancy outcomes in maternal OSA, however this finding requires validation in larger cohorts.


Subject(s)
Carbon Dioxide , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Humans , Obesity/complications , Obesity/genetics , Placenta , Pregnancy , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/genetics
2.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 18(2): 423-432, 2022 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34351847

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in a cohort of women with class III obesity, and a comparator lean group, in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Secondary objectives were to compare characteristics of women with obesity with and without OSA and to assess factors that were predictive of OSA. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study involving 33 women with class III obesity (mean body mass index 43.5 ± 3.9 kg/m2) and 39 lean women (body mass index 22.0 ± 1.7 kg/m2) with singleton pregnancies. Participants completed 2 level 3 sleep studies between 12-22 weeks and 32-38 weeks gestation. OSA was defined as a respiratory event index ≥ 5 events/h (≥ 3% desaturation criteria). Levels of interleukin-6, glucose, and C-peptide were quantified in maternal blood. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of OSA. RESULTS: OSA was identified in 12 (37.5%) and 14 (50.0%) women with obesity and in 1 (2.6%) and 3 (9.1%) lean women in the second and third trimesters, respectively. Women with obesity with OSA were older than those with no OSA but otherwise had similar characteristics. In unadjusted analysis of women with obesity, increased age, body mass index, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, and history of nonsmoking were associated with increased odds of OSA. In multivariable analysis, only increased age remained significantly associated with OSA. CONCLUSIONS: OSA is highly prevalent in pregnant women with class III obesity. Further research is required to establish effective management strategies for the growing number of women in this high-risk group. CITATION: Johns EC, Hill EA, Williams S, et al. High prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in pregnant women with class III obesity: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(2):423-432.


Subject(s)
Pregnant Women , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/epidemiology
3.
Obes Res Clin Pract ; 15(4): 357-361, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34034974

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Class III obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) during pregnancy predisposes mother and offspring to a range of adverse pregnancy complications and outcomes. Risk profiles vary between pregnancies and are affected by interpregnancy weight gain. We evaluated the risk of adverse outcomes in women with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 in first and second pregnancies, and the impact of interpregnancy weight change on this risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were extracted for all women with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 at first antenatal visit, who completed antenatal and delivery care for first and second pregnancies in NHS Lothian between 1/1/2009-31/12/2018. Multiple pregnancies and recipients of bariatric surgery were excluded. RESULTS: 442 pregnancies among 221 women were included. In first pregnancy, median (interquartile range) weight was 117 kg (108.5-126.7), age 28 years (24-31) and BMI 42 kg/m2 (41.0-44.5), 14.4% had gestational diabetes (GDM), 11.3% had pregnancy-induced hypertension and 44.6% had a post-partum haemorrhage (PPH). 20.8% of babies were large for gestational age (LGA, ≥97% centile at birth). In second pregnancy, women were heavier with a median weight of 119.9 kg (109.0-130.0, p = 0.00) with 19.9% gaining over 10 kg. Women were more likely to develop GDM (21.6%, p = 0.02). Babies were heavier with 40% of babies LGA (p < 0.0001). Interpregnancy weight change had no significant impact on GDM, pregnancy induced hypertension, PPH, perinatal mortality or LGA. CONCLUSIONS: In a population of women with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2, pregnancy complications are common and risk is higher in second pregnancy. The interpregnancy period is a critical time to engage women in health improvement and weight loss strategies to maximise outcomes for mother and offspring.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational , Pregnancy Outcome , Adult , Body Mass Index , Cohort Studies , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , Weight Gain
4.
Acta Physiol (Oxf) ; 229(2): e13458, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32087033

ABSTRACT

Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is a common obesity-related co-morbidity with strong associations to cardiometabolic disease. The risk of SDB is increased during pregnancy, particularly among obese pregnant women. Accumulating evidence suggests that an association exists between maternal SDB and the development of adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Intermittent hypoxia, a central characteristic of SDB, has been shown in animal and clinical studies to dysregulate several biological pathways. This includes the promotion of oxidative stress, increased inflammation, activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, increased sympathetic activity and impaired glucose and insulin metabolism. This review considers how, during pregnancy, these pathophysiological processes are plausible mechanisms through which SDB may contribute to an increased risk of adverse outcomes, for the mother and perhaps also the offspring. However, a lack of robust evidence specific to the pregnant population, including limited evaluation of the placental function in affected pregnancies, limits our ability to draw definite conclusions on mechanisms contributing to adverse pregnancy outcomes and, indeed, the strength of association between SDB and certain pregnancy complications.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications/physiopathology , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/complications , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System , Pituitary-Adrenal System , Placenta , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Risk Factors
5.
Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis ; 1866(2): 165374, 2020 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30684643

ABSTRACT

Maternal obesity is the most common metabolic disturbance in pregnancy affecting >1 in 5 women in some countries. Babies born to obese women are heavier with more adiposity at birth, and are vulnerable to obesity and metabolic disease across the lifespan suggesting offspring health is 'programmed' by fetal exposure to an obese intra-uterine environment. The placenta plays a major role in dictating the impact of maternal health on prenatal development. Maternal obesity impacts the function of integral placental receptors and transporters for glucocorticoids and nutrients, key drivers of fetal growth, though mechanisms remain poorly understood. This review aims to summarise current knowledge in this area, and considers the impact of obesity on the epigenetic machinery of the placenta at this vital juncture in offspring development. Further research is required to advance understanding of these areas in the hope that the trans-generational cycle of obesity can be alleviated.


Subject(s)
Fetal Development/physiology , Obesity, Maternal/metabolism , Placenta/metabolism , Adiposity , Epigenesis, Genetic/genetics , Female , Glucocorticoids/genetics , Glucocorticoids/metabolism , Humans , Maternal-Fetal Exchange , Nutrients/metabolism , Obesity/genetics , Obesity/metabolism , Obesity, Maternal/genetics , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/metabolism , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/metabolism
6.
Trends Endocrinol Metab ; 29(11): 743-754, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30297319

ABSTRACT

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the most common metabolic disturbance during pregnancy. The prevalence is rising and correlates with the increase in maternal obesity over recent decades. The etiology of GDM is complex, with genetic and environmental factors implicated in mechanistic and epidemiological studies. GDM begets important short- and long-term health risks for the mother, developing fetus, and offspring. This includes the high likelihood of subsequent maternal type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and possible adverse cardiometabolic phenotypes in the offspring. The most clinically and cost-effective methods of screening for GDM remain uncertain. Whilst treatments with lifestyle and pharmacological interventions have demonstrated short-term benefits, the long-term impact for the offspring of intrauterine exposure to antidiabetic medication remains unclear.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Complications , Diabetes, Gestational , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Infant, Newborn, Diseases , Obstetric Labor Complications , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/metabolism , Diabetes Complications/etiology , Diabetes, Gestational/diagnosis , Diabetes, Gestational/drug therapy , Diabetes, Gestational/etiology , Female , Humans , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/etiology , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/etiology , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/metabolism , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/pathology , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/physiopathology , Obstetric Labor Complications/etiology , Pregnancy , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/chemically induced
7.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 144: 294-301, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30244050

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Evidence suggests that screening for gestational diabetes (GDM) occurs too late in pregnancy, when changes in glucose metabolism and fetal growth rates can already be detected. In August 2016 NHS Lothian began screening women with risk factors for GDM during early pregnancy (11-13 weeks). We hypothesised that an earlier identification and treatment of dysglycaemia would improve pregnancy outcomes compared to previous standard care. METHODS: We compared management and outcomes for singleton pregnancies with GDM delivering at Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, UK, diagnosed through routine or early screening from 01/01/2015-31/10/2017 (routine screening n = 335, early screening n = 241). RESULTS: Early screening increased the proportion of women diagnosed before 24 weeks' gestation (n = 59/335, 17.6% vs n = 103/241, 42.7%, p < 0.001) but did not change the average monthly rate of diagnosis. Early screening increased the median duration of GDM during pregnancy (71 vs 93 days of gestation, p < 0.001) with no significant changes in the pharmacological management. Early screening improved the primary composite outcome (emergency caesarean section, neonatal hypoglycaemia and macrosomia; n = 138/335, 41.2% vs n = 73/241, 30.3%, adjusted Odds Ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.62 [0.43-0.91]. CONCLUSIONS: There is a role for early screening and management of GDM however it is unclear whether this represents a cost-effective intervention.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational/diagnosis , Diabetes, Gestational/therapy , Fetal Macrosomia/prevention & control , Hypoglycemia/prevention & control , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/prevention & control , Mass Screening/methods , Pregnancy Complications/prevention & control , Adult , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Prenatal Care , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...