Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 12(1): 146-155.e5, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37832820

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials of biologics in severe, uncontrolled asthma have excluded patients with a cumulative tobacco exposure of more than 10 pack-years. Therefore, our knowledge of the impact of smoking exposure on the clinical effects of biologics in severe asthma remains incomplete. However, because many patients with asthma are current or former smokers, investigating the potential impacts of tobacco exposure on the effects of biologic treatment is clinically important. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of smoking history and tobacco exposure on the effectiveness of biologic therapy in real-life patients with severe asthma. METHODS: We used data from a complete nationwide cohort of patients with severe asthma who were receiving biologics, the Danish Severe Asthma Register. We divided patients according to smoking history and cumulative tobacco exposure and analyzed data at baseline and after 12 months of biologic treatment. RESULTS: A total of 724 bio-naive patients were identified in the Danish Severe Asthma Register, 398 of whom had never been smokers (55%), 316 were previous smokers (44%), and 10 were current smokers (1%). Within the group of current and former smokers, 37% had 1 to 9 pack-years of tobacco exposure, 26% had 10 to 19 pack-years, and 37% had 20 or more pack-years of tobacco exposure. Patients with tobacco exposure had similar reductions in the number of exacerbations, reductions in maintenance oral corticosteroid use, and improvements in asthma symptoms compared with patients with 0 pack-years. CONCLUSION: Former smoking history and lifetime tobacco exposure do not have an impact on the efficacy of biologics in patients with severe asthma.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Biological Products , Humans , Smoking/epidemiology , Asthma/drug therapy , Asthma/epidemiology , Asthma/diagnosis , Biological Therapy , Denmark/epidemiology , Biological Products/therapeutic use
2.
ERJ Open Res ; 8(4)2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36199589

ABSTRACT

Background: Phase III regulatory trials show that anti-interleukin (IL)-5 biologics efficiently reduce exacerbations and the use of maintenance oral corticosteroids (mOCS) in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. However, patients eligible for these trials differ significantly compared with real-life severe asthma populations. Therefore, our aim was to explore efficacy in a real-life setting. The Danish Severe Asthma Register (DSAR) is a complete, nationwide register that comprises all Danish patients on biological therapy for severe asthma. Methods: This prospective study identified patients in the DSAR who were complete responders to anti-IL-5 biologics after 1 year of treatment. A complete response was defined as resolution of the parameter setting the indication, i.e. recurrent exacerbations and/or use of mOCS. Results: A total of 289 out of 502 (58%) patients were complete responders to anti-IL-5 biologics after 12 months. Complete responders had greater improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 s and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score compared with noncomplete responders (Δ 210 versus 30 mL; p<0.0001 and Δ -1.04 versus -0.68; p=0.016, respectively). A complete response was predicted by age at onset, less severe disease at baseline (i.e. no mOCS and lower ACQ score) and higher blood eosinophils. Conclusions: More than half of Danish patients treated with anti-IL-5 biologics for severe asthma achieve a complete response to treatment, thereby becoming free from asthma exacerbations and the need for mOCS. Complete responders also achieved superior effects on lung function and symptoms compared with noncomplete responders.

3.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 178(26)2016 Jun 27.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27402129

ABSTRACT

Asthma is one of the most frequent chronic diseases which complicate pregnancy. Well-controlled asthma during pregnancy reduces the risk of for exacerbations and, consequently, the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. Pharmacological therapy for pregnant women with asthma is a challenge, not least due to suboptimal adherence with controller therapy and pregnant women's concerns about harmful effects of medication on the fetus. This review provides an update on the safety of asthma medication during pregnancy, based on recent clinical studies and international guidelines.


Subject(s)
Asthma/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications/prevention & control , Administration, Inhalation , Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists/therapeutic use , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Disease Progression , Female , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Medication Adherence , Pregnancy
4.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 178(15): V01160046, 2016 Apr 11.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27094537

ABSTRACT

Specific inhalation challenge (SIC) is the golden standard for identifying specific causes of work-related asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis. Few centres offer SIC as it requires experience, resources and acute treatment facilities. Prior to SIC treatment should be carefully reduced. A control challenge is performed on a separate day. Many new asthma causes have been identified with SIC. SIC provides the basis for optimal treatment and advice.


Subject(s)
Asthma, Occupational/diagnosis , Bronchial Provocation Tests , Nasal Provocation Tests , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/diagnosis , Critical Pathways , Humans , Rhinitis, Allergic/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...