Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
Adv Mater ; 33(35): e2101760, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34278621

ABSTRACT

Billions of internet connected devices used for medicine, wearables, and robotics require microbattery power sources, but the conflicting scaling laws between electronics and energy storage have led to inadequate power sources that severely limit the performance of these physically small devices. Reported here is a new design paradigm for primary microbatteries that drastically improves energy and power density by eliminating the vast majority of the packaging and through the use of high-energy-density anode and cathode materials. These light (50-80 mg) and small (20-40 µL) microbatteries are enabled though the electroplating of 130 µm-thick 94% dense additive-free and crystallographically oriented LiCoO2 onto thin metal foils, which also act as the encapsulation layer. These devices have 430 Wh kg-1 and 1050 Wh L-1 energy densities, 4 times the energy density of previous similarly sized microbatteries, opening up the potential to power otherwise unpowerable microdevices.

2.
Genet Med ; 13(7): 621-4, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21602691

ABSTRACT

Newborn screening programs are state based with variable policies. Guidance regarding the retention, storage, and use of portions of newborn screening dried blood spots that remain after screening (residual specimens) was first published in 1996. Since then, newborn screening programs have paid increased attention to specimen storage and usage issues. Standard residual specimen uses include quality assurance and program evaluation, treatment efficacy, test refinement, and result verification. In all cases, privacy and security are primary concerns. In general, two distinct state practices regarding the storage and use of residual newborn screening specimens exist: (1) short-term storage (<3 years), primarily for standard program uses and (2) long-term storage (>18 years), for standard program uses and possible important public health research uses. Recently, there have been concerns in some consumer communities regarding both the potential uses of residual specimens and patient (newborn and family) privacy. To assist in policy improvements that can protect the individual's privacy and allow for important public health uses of residual newborn screening specimens, the Secretary of Health and Human Services' Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children has developed recommendations (with requested action by the Secretary where applicable). This report presents the Committee's recommendations and reviews the pertinent associated issues.


Subject(s)
Blood Specimen Collection/standards , Child Health Services/standards , Neonatal Screening/standards , Advisory Committees , Blood Specimen Collection/methods , Child Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/blood , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/prevention & control , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Neonatal Screening/methods , United States , United States Dept. of Health and Human Services
3.
Genet Med ; 12(6): 364-9, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20445457

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Medical foods and pharmacological doses of vitamins are used to treat certain genetic diseases for the duration of a patient's lifetime, which necessitates life-long management of the condition and diet by the patient and a health care provider. However, payment for medical foods and health insurance coverage of medical foods is not uniform. METHODS: A survey of states' newborn screening (NBS) representatives and a review of state policies (as of 2008) were conducted to ascertain payment and insurance coverage of medical foods. RESULTS: According to the NBS representatives, 61% of the states provided or guaranteed medical foods for all or a subset of the population detected by NBS, whereas 82% of states provided or guaranteed medical formulas for the same population. Policies for private health insurance coverage existed in 33/50 states, and range from providing medical food for one specific metabolic condition to providing it for any NBS disorder. In addition, there is variability among states in the specificity of defining what conditions qualify for medical foods. CONCLUSION: This article suggests four options, not mutually exclusive, options for addressing the patchwork of state policies regarding coverage of medical foods, ranging from amending Medicaid legislation to enacting federal legislation, or changing the Food and Drug Administration's stance on oversight of medical foods.


Subject(s)
Food, Organic/economics , Legislation, Food , Metabolism, Inborn Errors/diet therapy , Metabolism, Inborn Errors/economics , Reimbursement Mechanisms/trends , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Metabolism, Inborn Errors/diagnosis
7.
Pediatrics ; 117(5 Pt 2): S212-52, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16735250

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Newborn screening programs have expanded over the years; currently, many programs screen for dozens of congenital conditions that, if not detected and treated early, could result in catastrophic health consequences, including death. Some programs, however, still require universal newborn screening for only a few conditions. Although all 51 US programs (all states and the District of Columbia) have statutory screening requirements and similarities exist in many parts of the different screening systems, the enabling statutes, rules, regulations, protocols, and financing strategies vary dramatically. Consequently, there is a significant lack of equity in newborn screening services across the country. METHODS: We investigated program variations existing in and around January 2005 and provide baseline information with which future program comparisons can be made. We used program surveys, electronic searches of legislation, and individual input (validation) from program decision-makers to create a reservoir of program information. RESULTS: Included is a compilation of pertinent newborn screening statutes, information from genetic privacy statutes that potentially affects newborn screening programs, and a review of state laws that affect specimen and information retention. In addition, program policies related to the use of residual newborn screening blood spots are reviewed, along with the developmental processes affecting program informational brochures, including the information contained and the strategies for brochure dissemination. CONCLUSIONS: Building on a progressive and successful history, newborn screening continues as an example of an essential population genetic screening program. As the intricacies of screening systems have increased in complexity, so have the policy issues that shape program successes and failures. The summary information in this article provides a basis for national and individual program evaluation. Indeed, some of the information reported here has already been useful for program refinements reported elsewhere in this supplement.


Subject(s)
Neonatal Screening , Confidentiality , Health Education , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Neonatal Screening/legislation & jurisprudence , Neonatal Screening/standards , Public Policy , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...