Outcomes of Isolated Open Gastrocnemius Recession for the Treatment of Chronic Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) is a common condition causing pain and dysfunction. Patients with diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, and obesity are at increased risk of developing IAT. These comorbidities also carry an increased risk of wound healing complications following surgery. Therefore, there is a need for alternative management strategies for this high-risk patient population. This study investigated the potential role of isolated GR in patients with chronic IAT. METHODS: This study is a single-institution retrospective review of adult patients who underwent isolated GR to address chronic IAT with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Demographics, complications, radiographic findings, and preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome scores (PROs) were collected. The primary outcome was improvement in PROMIS scores from preoperative to postoperative. Secondary outcomes were complication and reoperation rates. RESULTS: Sixteen patients underwent open GR with a mean follow-up of 2.7 years. Postoperative PROMIS domain scores improved significantly from preoperative scores for physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, and global physical function. Two patients (13%) underwent reoperation (open calcaneal exostectomy and tendon debridement) at a mean time of 7 months from gastrocnemius recession. One patient developed a postoperative hematoma that resolved with conservative management. CONCLUSION: This single-institution series reports on a small cohort of patients with chronic IAT treated with open GR. We found significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes. Rates of complication and reoperation were low. This study supports the potential use of isolated gastrocnemius recession in IAT patients who, because of age or medical comorbidities, may benefit from a less invasive surgery and faster rehabilitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case control study.

Republication of "How Will the Foot and Ankle Orthopedic Community Respond to the Growing Opioid Epidemic?"

In the midst of the current opioid crisis, it has become critically important to properly manage opioid-prescribing patterns for the treatment of postoperative pain. There is currently a scarcity of literature specifying prescription and consumption patterns following orthopedic surgery and specifically foot and ankle surgery. Clinical guidelines for postoperative pain management are deficient.

Incidence and predictors of valgus tibiotalar tilt after progressive collapsing foot deformity reconstruction using subtalar fusion with concomitant procedures.

PURPOSE: Development of valgus tibiotalar tilt is a significant complication after subtalar fusion for progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) correction. However, its incidence and etiologic factors have not been extensively studied. The purpose of this study was to define the incidence of valgus tibiotalar tilt after subtalar fusion for PCFD reconstruction, and to determine predictors of this complication. METHODS: This study included 59 patients who underwent PCFD reconstruction with subtalar fusion. Patients with tibiotalar tilt prior to surgery were excluded. On standard weightbearing radiographs, the talonavicular coverage angle, talo-1st metatarsal angle, calcaneal pitch, hindfoot moment arm (HMA), and medial distal tibial angle were measured. Weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) was used to determine the presence of lateral bony impingement. A radiologist evaluated the superficial and deep deltoid ligaments using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Univariate regression analysis was used to identify the factors associated with development of postoperative valgus tibiotalar tilt, defined as tilt > 2 degrees. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (28.8%) developed postoperative valgus tibiotalar tilt at a mean of 7.7 (range 2-31) months. Eight (47.1%) of these patients developed valgus tibiotalar tilt within 3 months. Univariate logistic regression demonstrated association between preoperative HMA and postoperative valgus tibiotalar tilt (odds ratio 1.06, P = 0.026), with a 6% increase in risk per millimeter of increased HMA. Deltoid ligament status and concomitant procedures on other joints did not correlate with postoperative valgus tilt. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that surgeons should be cognizant of patients with a greater degree of preoperative hindfoot valgus and their propensity to develop a valgus ankle deformity. Additionally, our relatively high incidence of valgus tibiotalar tilt suggests that weightbearing ankle radiographs should be included in the initial and subsequent follow-up of PCFD patients with hindfoot valgus treated with subtalar fusion.

Percutaneous Techniques in Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery.

This article presents the indications, contraindications, preoperative surgical planning, surgical technique, and postoperative management of some of the most common percutaneous procedures in orthopedic foot and ankle surgery. The background of each procedure also is presented, supported by the latest in published literature to educate surgeons. Such topics include percutaneous bunionectomy, lesser toe deformity and bunionette correction, calcaneal osteotomy, cheilectomy, and first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis.

Effect of Fixation Type and Bone Graft on Tarsometatarsal Fusion.

BACKGROUND:: End-stage tarsometatarsal (TMT) arthritis is commonly treated with arthrodesis of involved joints. Fixation hardware can consist of varying combinations of screws, plates, and staples with or without supplemental bone graft. There are limited data to demonstrate either superiority of a given fixation method or the impact of bone graft on fusion rates. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to determine whether nonunion rates after TMT arthrodesis were influenced by either the use of screw vs plate fixation or the addition of bone graft vs no bone graft. METHODS:: All patients older than 18 years undergoing arthrodesis for TMT arthritis between July 1991 and July 2016 were identified retrospectively. Exclusion criteria included less than 12 months follow-up, prior midfoot surgery, any added procedure beyond TMT arthrodesis using plates or screws, and acute foot trauma. All patients with radiographic or clinical nonunion, including those requiring revision surgery, were identified. Demographic data and associated risk factors were recorded via chart and radiographic image review. Eighty-eight patients (88 feet, mean follow-up: 75.1 ± 51.4; range, 12-179), with a total of 189 joints and who met enrollment criteria were treated by 9 different surgeons with arthrodesis. RESULTS:: The overall nonunion rate was 11.4%. Significant independent risk factors associated with nonunion were (1) arthrodesis using plate fixation with all screws through the plate (odds ratio [OR], 6.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-21.3; P = .004), (2) smoking during the perioperative period (OR, 7.9; 95% CI, 2.1-30.2; P = .002), and (3) postoperative nonanatomic alignment (OR, 11.2; 95% CI, 2.1-60.8; P = .005). Bone graft utilization was found to significantly lower the rate of nonunion (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.6; P = .006). CONCLUSION:: Isolated plate fixation, smoking, and postoperative nonanatomic alignment appear to significantly increase the rate of nonunion among patients undergoing TMT arthrodesis for midfoot arthritis. Concomitant use of autogenous bone graft significantly decreased this risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Reoperation Rate Differences Between Open Reduction Internal Fixation and Primary Arthrodesis of Lisfranc Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Controversy persists as to whether Lisfranc injuries are best treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) versus primary arthrodesis (PA). Reoperation rates certainly influence this debate, but prior studies are often confounded by inclusion of hardware removal as a complication rather than as a planned, staged procedure inherent to ORIF. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether reoperation rates, excluding planned hardware removal, differ between ORIF and PA. A secondary aim was to evaluate patient risk factors associated with reoperation after operative treatment of Lisfranc injuries. METHODS: Between July 1991 and July 2016, adult patients who sustained closed, isolated Lisfranc injuries with or without fractures and who underwent ORIF or PA with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were analyzed. Reoperation rates for reasons other than planned hardware removal were examined, as were patient risk factors predictive of reoperation. Two hundred seventeen patients met enrollment criteria (mean follow-up, 62.5 ± 43.1 months; range, 12-184), of which 163 (75.1%) underwent ORIF and 54 (24.9%) underwent PA. RESULTS: Overall and including planned procedures, patients treated with ORIF had a significantly higher rate of return to the operation room (75.5%) as compared to those in the PA group (31.5%, P < .001). When excluding planned hardware removal, however, there was no difference in reoperation rates between the 2 groups (29.5% in the ORIF group and 29.6% in the PA group, P = 1). Risk factors correlating with unplanned return to the operation room included deep infection ( P = .009-.001), delayed wound healing ( P = .008), and high-energy trauma ( P = .01). CONCLUSION: When excluding planned removal of hardware, patients with Lisfranc injuries treated with ORIF did not demonstrate a higher rate of reoperation compared with those undergoing PA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.