Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 7(3): 266-71, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18380208

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hydrocortisone butyrate (HCB) is currently marketed as a cream, ointment, and solution. A new lotion formulation of hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1% (Locoid lotion) has been developed and evaluated. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HCB 0.1% lotion compared to the vehicle in subjects aged 3 months to less than 18 years with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis (AD). METHODS: In this multicenter double-blind study, 284 subjects with mild to moderate AD were randomized 1:1 to receive HCB 0.1% lotion or the vehicle for a duration of 4 weeks. "Treatment success" was defined as those subjects with a final Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score of 0 or 1 that had at least a 2-point reduction in the PGA score from baseline to day 29. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. RESULTS: Analyses of the final PGA score showed a significant treatment effect (P <.001) in favor of the HCB 0.1% lotion group. The safety profile of the HCB 0.1% lotion was also favorable. LIMITATIONS: The study did not assess the durability of the treatment effects (ie, safety and efficacy) after completion of the 4-week treatment period nor the potential need for longer term therapy given the chronic nature of AD. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate the safety and efficacy of HCB 0.1% lotion in the treatment of mild to moderate AD in children 3 months to 18 years of age.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Hydrocortisone/analogs & derivatives , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Administration, Cutaneous , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Dermatitis, Atopic/complications , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Hydrocortisone/adverse effects , Hydrocortisone/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Infant , Male , Pruritus/drug therapy , Pruritus/etiology , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
2.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 24(6): 525-32, 2005 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15933563

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A large dosage pediatric formulation of amoxicillin/clavulanate with an improved pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile was developed to eradicate many penicillin-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae (including beta-lactamase-producing strains). METHODS: This randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter trial examined treatment of bacterial acute otitis media (AOM) in children 6-30 months of age with amoxicillin/clavulanate (90/6.4 mg/kg/d in 2 divided doses for 10 days) versus azithromycin (10 mg/kg for 1 day followed by 5 mg/kg/d for 4 days). Tympanocentesis was performed at entry for bacteriologic assessment, at the on-therapy visit (day 4-6) to determine bacterial eradication and at any time before the end-of-therapy visit (day 12-14) if the child was categorized as experiencing clinical failure. Clinical assessments were performed at the on-therapy, end-of-therapy and follow-up (day 21-25) visits. RESULTS: We enrolled 730 children; AOM pathogens were isolated at baseline for 249 of the amoxicillin/clavulanate group and 245 of the azithromycin group. For children with AOM pathogens at baseline, clinical success rates at the end-of-therapy visit were 90.5% for amoxicillin/clavulanate versus 80.9% for azithromycin (P < 0.01), and those at the on-therapy and follow-up visits were 94.9% versus 88.0% and 80.3% versus 71.1%, respectively (all P < 0.05). At the on-therapy visit, pretherapy pathogens were eradicated for 94.2% of children receiving amoxicillin/clavulanate versus 70.3% of those receiving azithromycin (P < 0.001). Amoxicillin/clavulanate eradicated 96.0% of S. pneumoniae (92.0% of fully penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae) and 89.7% of H. influenzae (85.7% [6 of 7 cases] of beta-lactamase-positive H. influenzae). Corresponding rates for azithromycin were 80.4% (54.5%) for S. pneumoniae and 49.1% (100% [1 of 1 case]) for H. influenzae (all P < 0.01 for between-drug comparisons). CONCLUSION: Amoxicillin/clavulanate was clinically and bacteriologically more effective than azithromycin among children with bacterial AOM, including cases caused by penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae and beta-lactamase-positive H. influenzae.


Subject(s)
Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Otitis Media/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination/administration & dosage , Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Azithromycin/administration & dosage , Azithromycin/pharmacology , Child, Preschool , Female , Haemophilus influenzae/drug effects , Humans , Infant , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Otitis Media/microbiology , Penicillin Resistance , Streptococcus pneumoniae/drug effects , Treatment Outcome
3.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 22(8 Suppl): S131-8, 2003 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14566999

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial treatment of pediatric respiratory tract infections has evolved during the past 30 years as a result of antimicrobial resistance. The focus of antimicrobial therapy in these conditions has shifted from penicillins to other agents because of the dramatic increase in antimicrobial resistance among common respiratory pathogens, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis. It is important for clinicians to understand how resistance develops so that they can help prevent this phenomenon from occurring with other antimicrobials. METHODS: This article reviews the published literature on resistance to macrolide antimicrobials among common pediatric respiratory tract pathogens and clinical and bacteriologic outcomes of infections with these pathogens. RESULTS: Resistance among common pediatric respiratory tract pathogens to macrolides occurs through two main mechanisms, alteration of the target site and active efflux. Although resistance patterns vary by geographic region, the widespread use of macrolides has contributed to the emergence of both types of macrolide-resistant organisms. Conditions that favor the selection and proliferation of resistant strains include children with repeated, close contact who frequently receive antimicrobial treatment or prophylaxis, such as children who attend day care. Recent US surveillance data show that 20 to 30% of S. pneumoniae are resistant to macrolides, with approximately two-thirds of macrolide-resistant strains associated with an efflux mechanism and the remainder associated with a ribosomal methylase. Additionally, although less well-known, virtually all strains of H. influenzae have an intrinsic macrolide efflux pump. As resistance to macrolides has increased, clinical failures have resulted, and these agents are no longer considered appropriate for empiric first line antimicrobial therapy of acute otitis media and sinusitis unless patients are truly penicillin-allergic. Therefore, other antimicrobials are recommended for the empiric treatment of children with respiratory tract infections, including higher doses of amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanate (90 mg/kg/day amoxicillin), cefuroxime axetil and intramuscular ceftriaxone. CONCLUSIONS: As resistance to macrolides increases and clinical failures in children become more common with this class of antimicrobials, judicious use of antimicrobials is needed. This includes limiting antimicrobial use for viral infections and using the most effective agents when antimicrobials are clinically indicated, such as higher doses of amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanate. Application of these principles may prevent proliferation and further development of resistance.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Child , Haemophilus influenzae/drug effects , Humans , Moraxella catarrhalis/drug effects , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Streptococcus pneumoniae/drug effects
4.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 21(9): 854-9, 2002 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12352809

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of a birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) on the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a novel diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP)- HepB-inactivated poliovirus (IPV)/ type b (Hib) combination vaccine administered subsequently at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. METHODS: Neonates ( = 550) were randomized into two groups with regard to receipt of HepB at birth. All subjects in both groups received DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. Solicited local and general adverse events were recorded for 8 days after each dose. Antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen were measured 1 month after the third dose of DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib in a subset of 170 infants; titers of at least 10 mIU/ml were considered protective. RESULTS: The DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib combination vaccine was well-tolerated in both groups. Of the infants who received a birth dose of HepB, 22.6% had severe (Grade 3) reactions after any of the three doses of DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib combination vaccine compared with 23.2% of subjects who did not receive a birth dose of HepB (difference, -0.5%; 90% confidence interval, -7.4 to 6.1). Antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen titers were > or =10 mIU/ml for all tested infants. Geometric mean titers were 2996.2 and 1240.1 mIU/ml with and without a birth dose of HepB, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A HepB birth dose does not increase the reactogenicity of a combination DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib vaccine administered at 2, 4 and 6 months of age, and all tested subjects achieved protective anti-HBs titers (> or =10 mIU/ml), although geometric mean titers were higher when a birth dose of HepB was given.


Subject(s)
Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/immunology , Haemophilus Vaccines/immunology , Hepatitis B Vaccines/administration & dosage , Hepatitis B Vaccines/immunology , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated/immunology , Polysaccharides, Bacterial/immunology , Vaccines, Combined/immunology , Bacterial Capsules , Cohort Studies , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Haemophilus Vaccines/adverse effects , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/blood , Hepatitis B Vaccines/adverse effects , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated/adverse effects , Polysaccharides, Bacterial/adverse effects , Vaccines, Combined/adverse effects
5.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep ; 2(4): 297-303, 2002 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12044264

ABSTRACT

Otitis media continues to present a major challenge to practitioners in the clinical setting. With the ever-increasing trend toward the use of a sound research-structured approach to health care and the use of evidence-based guidelines, it is important to have an understanding of these findings related to otitis media. A review of research-supported literature regarding the diagnosis and management of this disease, and suggestions for the judicious use of antibiotics, are presented in this paper.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Otitis Media/diagnosis , Otitis Media/therapy , Appetite/physiology , Diarrhea/etiology , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Earache/etiology , Evidence-Based Medicine , Fatigue/etiology , Humans , Immunization , Otitis Media/microbiology , Parents/education , Risk Factors , Vomiting/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...