ABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Giant cell arteritis (GCA), a medium and large vessel vasculitis occurring in the aged, remains a formidable disease, capable of taking both vision and life, through a multitude of vascular complications. Our understanding of the spectrum of its manifestations has grown over the years, to include limb claudication, aortitis, and cardiac disease, in addition to the more classic visual complications resulting from of ischemia to branches of the external and internal carotid arteries. While a clinical presentation of headache, jaw claudication, scalp tenderness, fever and other systemic symptoms and serum markers are together highly suggestive of the disease, diagnosis can be challenging in those cases in which classic symptoms are lacking. The purpose of this review is to update the reader on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of giant cell arteritis and to review our evolving understanding of the immunological mechanism underlying the disease, which have helped guide our search for novel therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: There is increasing evidence supporting the use of Doppler ultrasound, dedicated post-contrast T1-weighted spin echo MRI of the scalp arteries and PET scan, which can together improve our diagnostic accuracy in cases in which temporal artery biopsy is either inconclusive or not feasible. Advances in our understanding of the immunological cascades underlying the disease have helped guide our search for steroid-sparing treatments for the GCA, the most important of which has been the IL-6 receptor antibody inhibitor tocilizumab, which has been shown to reduce cumulative steroid dose in a large multicenter, placebo-controlled prospective study. Other biologic agents, such as abatacept and ustekinumab have shown promise in smaller studies. SUMMARY: GCA is no longer a disease whose diagnosis is based exclusively on temporal artery biopsy and whose complications are prevented solely with the use of corticosteroids. Modern vascular imaging techniques and targeted immunologic therapies are heralding a new era for the disease, in which practitioners will hopefully be able to diagnosis it with greater accuracy and treat it with less ischemic complications and iatrogenic side effects.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal sinusitis carries high morbidity and mortality and often poses a diagnostic challenge. Orbital apex syndrome (OAS) is not an uncommon presentation in the setting of invasive fungal sinusitis. Delays in diagnosis and appropriate treatment can result in permanent visual dysfunction and, potentially, death. We present 2 cases of OAS secondary to invasive sinus aspergillosis, detailing the diagnostic process, treatment, and outcome for both patients. Subsequently, we present a review of the literature and combined analysis of our 2 patients plus 71 cases from previously published reports. METHODS: Literature review was performed to identify demographic, diagnostic, clinical, and treatment data of patients with OAS caused by Aspergillus species. RESULTS: The review resulted in 52 included articles with 71 patients, plus our 2 reported patients, leading to a total of 73 subjects included in the analysis. The average age of patients at presentation was 59.9 years. A combination of visual disturbance and pain (headache and/or periocular pain) was the most common presentation reported (46 cases; 63%). Diabetes mellitus was reported in 15 cases (21%), with more than half specifically noted to have poorly controlled diabetes. After diabetes, the second most common cause of immunocompromise was chronic steroid use (n = 13; 18%). Empiric antifungal treatment was started in 10 patients (14%), while 25 patients (34%) were first treated with systemic steroids due to a concern for an inflammatory etiology. Time to diagnosis from initial presentation was on average 7.4 weeks (range of 0.3-40 weeks). Approximately 78% of the cases (57 of 73) had biopsies with histology that confirmed Aspergillus fungal morphology, and 30/73 (41%) had diagnostic fungal cultures. The majority of the cases received monotherapy with intravenous (IV) amphotericin B (36 patients; 49%) and IV voriconazole (19 patients; 26%), with a combination of the 2 or more antifungal agents being used in 11 patients (15%). Forty patients (55%) showed signs of clinical improvement with treatment, while 33 (45%) patients did not experience any improvement or continued to deteriorate, and 23 (32%) died in the course of their reported follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The present cases illustrate well the challenge in the diagnosis and treatment of OAS due to invasive sinus aspergillosis. Our review and analysis of 73 cases support the notion that a high index of suspicion leading to early biopsy with histology and fungal culture is paramount for diagnosis. Early empiric antifungal treatment and debridement can potentially reduce morbidity and mortality.
