Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Health Promot Perspect ; 11(2): 179-185, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34195041

ABSTRACT

Background: Public health officials anticipate severe health outcomes amidst the circulation of two major viruses, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and influenza. This study investigated intent to be vaccinated against COVID-19 and influenza, and sought to identify attitudes towards vaccines and barriers for vaccine acceptance. Methods: This observational cross-sectional study was conducted in the Louisiana State University Medicine Clinic from September 2020 to December 2020. Intent to be vaccinated against the COVID-19 and influenza virus was assessed through a brief questionnaire. Additionally, hesitancy and attitudes regarding vaccines were ascertained using validated 5-point Likert scales. In total, 280 patients completed the questionnaire. Results: A total of 248 patients were included in the final analysis. Overall 167 (67%, 95% CI = 61.1-73.0%) of patients were unsure or did not intend to be vaccinated against COVID-19, while only 19.3% (95% CI = 14.4-24.5%) were unsure or did not intend to be vaccinated against the influenza vaccine. Reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy included concern regarding side effects, fear of getting sick from the vaccine, and the absence of vaccine recommendations from their doctor. Concerningly, African American patients demonstrated decreased likelihood of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Conclusion: This survey revealed that only 1 in 3 adults intended to be vaccinated against COVID-19, while 8 out of 10 adults intended to receive the influenza vaccine. Patients who intended on getting the COVID-19 vaccine were less likely to be African American. Given the degree of hesitancy against COVID-19 vaccination, a multifaceted approach to facilitate vaccine uptake that includes vaccine education, behavioral change strategies, and health promotion, is paramount.

2.
Dig Dis Sci ; 66(12): 4090-4098, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33433812

ABSTRACT

The etiology of most cases of liver diseases in pregnancy can be diagnosed with a thorough history, physical examination, laboratory values, serology, and noninvasive imaging. However, atypical clinical and laboratory presentations of liver diseases/chemistries require a liver biopsy to render an accurate diagnosis in cases where the biopsy results affect the timing of delivery or impact choice of medical therapy. According to the American College of Gastroenterology, liver biopsy can be effectively and safely conducted in pregnant women. Conventional routes of performing a liver biopsy include the percutaneous, transjugular route, and surgical methods. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy is a recent technique that has not yet gained widespread adoption but can potentially serve as an alternative route for obtaining the liver sample. Adverse events associated with liver biopsy include abdominal pain and hemorrhage. Maternal and fetal outcomes are limited to increased risk of preterm birth and small for gestational age neonate. However, very few studies have formally evaluated the safety of liver biopsy in pregnant women. In this review, we present two successful cases of liver biopsy performed during pregnancy and summarize the most recent evidence regarding the safety and outcomes of the procedure in pregnancy to assist clinicians in their decision to perform a liver biopsy during pregnancy or postpone it until after delivery.


Subject(s)
Cholestasis, Intrahepatic/pathology , Fatty Liver/pathology , Liver/pathology , Pregnancy Complications/pathology , Adult , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Predictive Value of Tests , Pregnancy , Risk Assessment , Ultrasonography/adverse effects , Young Adult
3.
J Cancer Educ ; 36(6): 1277-1284, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32441002

ABSTRACT

Obesity is a critical modifiable risk factor in cancer prevention, control, and survivorship. Comprehensive weight loss interventions (e.g., Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP)) have been recommended by governmental agencies to treat obesity. However, their high implementation costs limit their reach, especially in underserved African American (AA) communities. Community health workers (CHWs) or trusted community members can help increase access to obesity interventions in underserved regions facing provider shortages. CHW-led interventions have increased weight loss. However, in-person CHW training can be costly to deliver and often requires extensive travel to implement. Web-based trainings have become common to increase reach at reduced cost. However, the feasibility of an online CHW training to deliver the DPP in AAs is unknown. The feasibility of an online CHW training to deliver the DPP adapted for AAs was assessed. The online training was compared to an in-person DPP training with established effectiveness. CHW effectiveness and satisfaction were assessed at baseline and 6 weeks. Nineteen participants (in-person n = 10; online n = 9) were recruited. At post-training, all scored higher than the 80% on a knowledge test required to deliver the intervention. All participants reported high levels of training satisfaction (88.9% of online participants and 90% of in-person participants rated the training as at least 6 on a 1-7 scale) and comfort to complete intervention tasks (78% of online participants and 60% of in-person participants scored at least 6 on a 1-7 scale). There were no significant differences in outcomes by arm. An online CHW training to deliver the DPP adapted for AAs faith communities produced comparable effectiveness and satisfaction to an evidence-based in-person CHW training. Further research is needed to assess the cost-effectiveness of different CHW training modalities to reduce obesity.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Community Health Workers , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Rural Population , Weight Loss
4.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 43(2): 316-324, 2021 06 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31781770

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies have considered the validity of self-reported hypertension relative to hypertension detected by examination; no study has explored trends in the difference between these two measures. Our objective was to calculate these differences overtime within subpopulations of the USA. METHODS: We included non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black and Hispanic adults who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys from 1999 to 2016, in the analysis (N = 44 333). We subtracted self-reported hypertension from hypertension detected by examination to calculate blood pressure difference (BPD). We fit weighted linear regression models that included important covariates along with all combination of two- and three-way interactions to predict the BPD. We used the fitted lines of the models to depict the patterns of differences in the different subpopulations. RESULTS: Age ≥ 45 years, lack of annual clinical visit, body mass index (BMI) < 25 and time were important factors associated with increased BPD. CONCLUSIONS: People who are ≥ 45 years, have normal BMI, or do not have annual medical visits are more likely to have a bigger BPD. We can use the calculated BPD, to adjust estimates of the prevalence of self-reported hypertension.


Subject(s)
Hypertension , Adult , Black or African American , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Nutrition Surveys , Prevalence , Self Report , United States/epidemiology , White People
5.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 7: 526, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32903492

ABSTRACT

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been recently identified as the culprit of the highly infectious, outbreak named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China. Now declared a public health emergency, this pandemic is present in more than 200 countries with over 14 million cases and 600,000 deaths as of July 18, 2020. Primarily transmitted through the respiratory tract, the most common clinical presentations of symptomatic individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 include fever, dyspnea, cough, fatigue, and sore throat. In advanced cases, patients may rapidly develop respiratory failure with acute respiratory distress syndrome, and even progress to death. While it is known that COVID-19 manifests similarly to the 2003 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and the 2012 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), primarily affecting the pulmonary system, the impact of the disease extends far beyond the respiratory system and affects other organs of the body. The literature regarding the extrapulmonary manifestations (cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, ocular, dermatologic, and neurological) of COVID-19 is scant. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of the organ-specific clinical manifestations of COVID-19, to increase awareness about the various organs affected by SARS-CoV-2 and to provide a brief insight into the similarities and differences in the clinical manifestations of COVID-19 and the earlier SARS and MERS.

6.
World J Gastrointest Endosc ; 12(3): 83-97, 2020 Mar 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32218888

ABSTRACT

Liver biopsy (LB) is an essential tool in diagnosing, evaluating and managing various diseases of the liver. As such, histopathological results are critical as they establish or aid in diagnosis, provide information on prognosis, and guide the appropriate selection of medical therapy for patients. Indications for LB include evaluation of persistent elevation of liver chemistries of unclear etiology, diagnosis of chronic liver diseases such as Wilson's disease, autoimmune hepatitis, small duct primary sclerosing cholangitis, work up of fever of unknown origin, amyloidosis and more. Traditionally, methods of acquiring liver tissue have included percutaneous LB (PCLB), transjugular LB (TJLB) or biopsy taken surgically via laparotomy or laparoscopy. However, traditional methods of LB may be inferior to newer methods. Additionally, PCLB and TJLB carry higher risks of adverse events and complications. More recently, endoscopic ultrasound guided LB (EUS-LB) has evolved as an alternative method of tissue sampling that has proven to be safe and effective, with limited adverse events. Compared to PC and TJ routes, EUS-LB may also have a greater diagnostic yield of tissue, be superior for a targeted approach of focal lesions, provide higher quality images and allow for greater patient comfort. These advantages have contributed to the increased use of EUS-LB as a technique for obtaining liver tissue. Herein, we provide a review of the recent evidence of EUS-LB for liver disease.

7.
Dig Dis Sci ; 65(2): 361-375, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31792671

ABSTRACT

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a well-known procedure with both diagnostic and therapeutic utilities in managing pancreaticobiliary conditions. With the advancements of endoscopic techniques, ERCP has become a relatively safe and effective procedure. However, as ERCP is increasingly being utilized for different advanced techniques, newer complications have been noticed. Post-ERCP complications are known, and mostly include pancreatitis, infection, hemorrhage, and perforation. The risks of these complications vary depending on several factors, such as patient selection, endoscopist's skills, and the difficulties involved during the procedure. This review discusses post-ERCP complications and management strategies with new and evolving concepts.


Subject(s)
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/methods , Cholangitis/prevention & control , Cholecystitis/prevention & control , Intestinal Perforation/prevention & control , Pancreatitis/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/adverse effects , Cholangitis/epidemiology , Cholangitis/therapy , Cholecystitis/epidemiology , Cholecystitis/therapy , Disinfection , Duodenoscopes/microbiology , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Humans , Infections/epidemiology , Infections/therapy , Intestinal Perforation/epidemiology , Intestinal Perforation/etiology , Intestinal Perforation/therapy , Pancreatic Ducts , Pancreatitis/epidemiology , Pancreatitis/therapy , Patient Selection , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Postoperative Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Postoperative Hemorrhage/therapy , Risk Factors , Stents
8.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis ; 16(11): 696-702, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27585393

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study mortality from nonmalignant diseases in subjects with high exposure to transmissible agents present in animals used for food, and in their raw or inadequately cooked products. METHODS: Mortality was compared in a cohort of meat handlers in slaughtering and processing plants with that of the U.S. general population. RESULTS: Excess mortality was observed for conditions known to be associated with infections-these include, septicemia, chronic nephritis, diseases of the kidney and ureter, diseases of the pancreas, cirrhosis of the liver, acute and subacute endocarditis, acute rheumatic fever, functional diseases of the heart, aortic aneurysm, intracranial and intraspinous abscess, and meningitis. Excess mortality was also observed for ischemic heart disease and diabetes, conditions without an established infectious etiology, but which have been linked with infections. CONCLUSIONS: If transmissible agents present in food animals and their raw products cause long-term diseases and mortality in humans, this study importantly points to the likely diseases, many of which are already known to be associated with infections. The excess mortality observed for ischemic heart disease and diabetes is consistent with existing evidence linking these conditions with infections, and gives rise to the novel hypothesis that microbial agents present in food animals and their products may be candidates for an infective role in the occurrence of these conditions, and therefore needs further investigation.


Subject(s)
Abattoirs , Communicable Diseases/etiology , Communicable Diseases/mortality , Meat/microbiology , Occupational Exposure , Zoonoses , Animals , Cause of Death , Cohort Studies , Food Microbiology , Humans , Livestock , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...